The Epstein Problem

[Troglodyte]

wait. hold up.
this doesnt effect you, personally.

so why do you suddenly care so, since it doesnt begin to penetrate your bubble?

It involves a heinous crime.

 

[Troglodyte]

Sure, the DOJ is on the level. Sure it is.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/20/trump-photo-removed-epstein-files-justice-department-bondi/

 

[Superman]

As I’ve said before, I don’t have a Clinton hat, flag, watch, bible, coin or any other nonsense that Trumptards purchase. I don’t care if he goes down, I don’t idolize or worship him. But… given that his image wasn't redacted, wouldn’t that suggest that he isn’t part of any criminal investigation?

because it's already known that Clinton was at the island numerous upon numerous times. If you were to look at the pictures, however, you will see that the girls/women in the pictures are blocked/redacted. Thus, it's extremely easy, even for you, Captain Smoothbrain, to determine that those girls/women could be victims and need to be protected while the investigation is ongoing. Merely swimming in a pool isnt a crime, right? (the correct answer to that, dipshit, is "no, its not a crime").

 

[Superman]

It involves a heinous crime.

Yet little kids getting touched, raped, kidnapped or even exposed to a grown man's hairy schlong in a public restroom is not.

understood.

 

[Superman]

Sure, the DOJ is on the level. Sure it is.

https://fortune.com/2025/12/20/trump-photo-removed-epstein-files-justice-department-bondi/

it was already released. if it wasnt already released, then how and why is it on the interwebz?

i sure hope you're not as sorry at the rest of your life as you are at critical thinking.

while we're on that ... why are the other pictures framed, but those are not? Kinda odd to have those specifically placed during the photos, right? I mean, it's not like the goobermint would try to ... frame ... someone.

 

[Troglodyte]

Yet little kids getting touched, raped, kidnapped or even exposed to a grown man's hairy schlong in a public restroom is not.

understood.

Trans people and pedophiles aren’t mutually inclusive despite what you think.

 

[Troglodyte]

View attachment 15916

it was already released. if it wasnt already released, then how and why is it on the interwebz?

Idiot. It was released yesterday and then redacted today.. The other photos without Trump remain released.

i sure hope you're not as sorry at the rest of your life as you are at critical thinking.

Critical thinking? You’re not even understanding what happened.

while we're on that ... why are the other pictures framed, but those are not? Kinda odd to have those specifically placed during the photos, right? I mean, it's not like the goobermint would try to ... frame ... someone.

View attachment 15917

So Trumps DOJ is trying to frame Trump?

 

[Troglodyte]

because it's already known that Clinton was at the island numerous upon numerous times. If you were to look at the pictures, however, you will see that the girls/women in the pictures are blocked/redacted. Thus, it's extremely easy, even for you, Captain Smoothbrain, to determine that those girls/women could be victims and need to be protected while the investigation is ongoing. Merely swimming in a pool isnt a crime, right? (the correct answer to that, dipshit, is "no, its not a crime").

WTF? You’re claiming the DOJs threshold for redacting images doesn’t apply if it’s “known” that a person was at the island? Presumption of innocence is out the window? Again, WTF?

 

[Ron Burgundy]

Yet little kids getting touched, raped, kidnapped or even exposed to a grown man's hairy schlong in a public restroom is not.

understood.

It's okay if he's wearing dress though, apparently.
Quit Being Transphobic.

 

[Troglodyte]

It's okay if he's wearing dress though, apparently.
Quit Being Transphobic.

No, it’s OK with Supe if it’s Trumps spiritual advisor….or Trump.

 

[Superman]

Trans people and pedophiles aren’t mutually inclusive despite what you think.

again, provide a link, or even a screen shot where i've said they are the same. just one. back up what you say. just. once.

 

[Superman]

No, it’s OK with Supe if it’s Trumps spiritual advisor….or Trump.

actually, i dont give a damn if some dude wants to wear a skirt. doesnt bother me at all what you do, flog.

 

[Superman]

Idiot. It was released yesterday and then redacted today.. The other photos without Trump remain released.

Critical thinking? You’re not even understanding what happened.

So Trumps DOJ is trying to frame Trump?

tell the class you have no clue what to think until you're told what to think in less words, retard.

 

[Superman]

WTF? You’re claiming the DOJs threshold for redacting images doesn’t apply if it’s “known” that a person was at the island? Presumption of innocence is out the window? Again, WTF?

the

girls

who

were

at

the

island

are

redacted

to

protect

them


it's not rocket science. retard.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

“Not saying that I believe that”
“I support it”

Waffle much?

You clearly don't understand what a qualifying statement is.

"A qualifying statement adds detail, context, or limitation to a main claim."

When you watch a news segment about Charlie Kirk's shooter, they will say "the accused suspect" or "the accused" because it has not yet been determined by a court of law to be fact that he is guilty.

When you watched the news and they discussed the manhunt for the Brown Univ shooter, they said "the person of interest" or "the suspect" because he hadn't been caught and/or proven to be the killer.

I provided qualifying statements with my post, which you don't comprehend.

Back to my question. Do you want the victims exposed, so as to face potential suiciding? Or is getting DJT so important to you that you are ok with gambling that this "might" be the hook that lands him and any of these victims suffering irreparable harm is ok?

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

It involves a heinous crime.

Like the assassination of Charlie Kirk, that you couldn't mention nor condemn for 2 weeks until pressured to do so by board members?

You're only bothered by certain heinous crimes that follow your political ideology.

 

[Superman]

I hesitate to share this as @Badcat will find a new IG chick to obsess over.

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

because it's already known that Clinton was at the island numerous upon numerous times. If you were to look at the pictures, however, you will see that the girls/women in the pictures are blocked/redacted. Thus, it's extremely easy, even for you, Captain Smoothbrain, to determine that those girls/women could be victims and need to be protected while the investigation is ongoing. Merely swimming in a pool isnt a crime, right? (the correct answer to that, dipshit, is "no, its not a crime").

“This is his reckoning. I mean, if you turn on CNN, that’s what they are talking about. I’ve gotten a million texts about it,” said a former Clinton aide, speaking about the images’ impact.

“People are like, ‘I can’t believe he was in a hot tub. Who’s the woman in there?’ She’s at, you know, body level. I mean, it’s, like, unbelievable. It’s just shocking.”

The former aide said Clinton’s documented interactions with Epstein are likely to shape public perception after years of speculation about powerful figures linked to the financier.

“[Clinton] is Prince Andrew… He’s kinda done. He was already done before, but now he’s even more so,” the aide said.

“People have to be brought to justice for if they did these things, there’s no question about it.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

the

girls

who

were

at

the

island

are

redacted

to

protect

them


it's not rocket science. retard.

Except the ones in the Miss Universe Pageant pictured with Trump to make him look guilty of something.

 

[Sarge]

“This is his reckoning. I mean, if you turn on CNN, that’s what they are talking about. I’ve gotten a million texts about it,” said a former Clinton aide, speaking about the images’ impact.


The former aide said Clinton’s documented interactions with Epstein are likely to shape public perception after years of speculation about powerful figures linked to the financier.

“[Clinton] is Prince Andrew… He’s kinda done. He was already done before, but now he’s even more so,” the aide said.

Eh, there’s no context to any of those photos. I don’t know if anyone in the photos are innocent or guilty. What I do know is that this release of the “Epstein” files is nothing more than an attempt by both republicans and democrats to score cheap political points. They aren’t interested in revealing the truth. If they were interested in the truth, it wouldn’t be so heavily redacted and they wouldn’t be running to MSN, CNN and FOX to point fingers. I mean, I would think the vast majority of Americans would be appalled by pedophilia. And yet something as reprehensible as messing with kids gets turned into a political circus rather than seeking justice for the wicked and protecting the vulnerable. Instead, they continue to protect the rich, powerful and politically connected. And we go out of our way to defend them. It’s pathetic.

 

[Superman]

Idiot. It was released yesterday and then redacted today.. The other photos without Trump remain released.

Critical thinking? You’re not even understanding what happened.

So Trumps DOJ is trying to frame Trump?

 

[Troglodyte]

tell the class you have no clue what to think until you're told what to think in less words, retard.

It’s a fact. It happened. Pam Bondi has been asked why. Curious minds want to know. Followers don’t question dear leader. You want the files released until he doesn’t.

 

[Steelr4evr]

That **** should be in prison or worse. None of them go to jail for anything.

They're the most untouchable gangsters in this country.

Nothing will ever change until people are held accountable. The only people who can do this is unfortunately the citizens of this land, not the law itself. They're above the law,because they control the application of law.

 

[Troglodyte]

the

girls

who

were

at

the

island

are

redacted

to

protect

them


it's not rocket science. retard.

The redactions were supposed to be limited to information and identities of the victims and minors. Prosecutors, FBI case agents and other law enforcement personnel who testified before the grand jury were not supposed to be redacted. Why do you defend the DOJ disregarding this directive?

 

[Troglodyte]

You clearly don't understand what a qualifying statement is.

"A qualifying statement adds detail, context, or limitation to a main claim."

When you watch a news segment about Charlie Kirk's shooter, they will say "the accused suspect" or "the accused" because it has not yet been determined by a court of law to be fact that he is guilty.

When you watched the news and they discussed the manhunt for the Brown Univ shooter, they said "the person of interest" or "the suspect" because he hadn't been caught and/or proven to be the killer.

I provided qualifying statements with my post, which you don't comprehend.

Back to my question. Do you want the victims exposed, so as to face potential suiciding? Or is getting DJT so important to you that you are ok with gambling that this "might" be the hook that lands him and any of these victims suffering irreparable harm is ok?

Two word question. 200 word response. A lot of explaining.

There aren’t literally hundreds of pages of victims identities. Thomas Massie knows this. MTG knows this. You don’t question dear leader.