• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"

Troglodyte said:
No, it would be false if NO arrests records were public record. The exception isn’t the rule. You’ve tried this nonsense before. And answer the question.
Click to expand...

You said ARRESTS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.

I corrected your misinformation. Often, names are not released for a myriad of reasons. You've again been edumacated. Get your GED.
 
Superman said:
ah, so you're stance is to imprison literally everyone in the name of public safety so that no one can commit any crime at all. put everyone in prison and behind walls.
but, wait ... if everyone is imprisoned and behind the same walls, we'll need more walls. and more prisons. and guards to patrol those prisons.

you really are a special kind of retard.

take the L for your cuLt. Loser.

View attachment 17833
Click to expand...
No, I’m specifically referring to the pedophiles Trump pardoned and you’re defending.
 
Hypocycloids said:
I don’t know nor do you, But you think you do. TDS is the driving force behind your belief.
Click to expand...
Step out of yiur bubble. this judge knows.


Hypocycloids said:
Are you trying to tell me that you’re setting yourself apart from the rest of the liberal cult?

Oh but you do care who it brings down, primarily Trump, otherwise this topic wouldn’t interest you. Who are you trying to kid.
Click to expand...
Trump demanded people to forget about the Epstein files. I never made such a demand.
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
You said ARRESTS ARE PUBLIC RECORDS.
Click to expand...
They are. You’re an idiot for trying to argue otherwise. Here…

Tim Steelersfan said:
I corrected your misinformation. Often, names are not released for a myriad of reasons. You've again been edumacated. Get your GED.
Click to expand...
 
Troglodyte said:
Trump demanded people to forget about the Epstein files. I never made such a demand.
Click to expand...
Once again irrelevant to what I said.
You don’t have make such a demand. Do you honestly expect anyone to believe you have risen above the obsession liberals have in seeing Trump hang?
Please.
 
Troglodyte said:
Step out of yiur bubble. this judge knows.

Click to expand...
Taking into account how much was withheld, the judge making that ruling was a no brainer.

But it doesn’t confirm that Blanches actions were unlawful. That remains to be seen.

What the judge doesn’t know is the contents of the files withheld nor what was redacted.

Because the Department of Justice (DOJ) has shielded the redacted information, the judge ordered the government to either unredact the documents or legally justify each individual redaction.

Im in no bubble, you’re in a cult.
 
Last edited:
Troglodyte said:
No, I’m specifically referring to the pedophiles Trump pardoned and you’re defending.
Click to expand...
ok, let me make another attempt to slow walk...

did you

or

did you NOT

know they were pedos prior to their last conviction?

on top of that, seeing as how you are now a staunch supporter of incarcerating child rapists and pedos, do splain how you continue to support Tim Walz, Keith Ellison and Natalie Hudson.

This should be good.
 
Troglodyte said:
They are. You’re an idiot for trying to argue otherwise. Here…


Click to expand...
LOLOLOLOLOLOL
you're such a goddamned idiot.

using YOUR site, show us the arrest records of all the J6ers. past and present arrest records.
and, more importantly, to prove you are correct about things - show their future arrest records.

1783777927215.png

out here harvesting all the Ls. you're in a cuLt.
Loser
 
Hypocycloids said:
Taking into account how much was withheld, the judge making that ruling was a no brainer.

But it doesn’t confirm that Blanches actions were unlawful. That remains to be seen.

What the judge doesn’t know is the contents of the files withheld nor what was redacted.

Because the Department of Justice (DOJ) has shielded the redacted information, the judge ordered the government to either unredact the documents or legally justify each individual redaction.

Im in no bubble, you’re in a cult.
Click to expand...
You are indeed in a bubble…

 
Troglodyte said:
You are indeed in a bubble…

Click to expand...
Ro Khanna? The guy who was solidly behind a nazi loving rapist until Platner’s polling cratered and then suddenly developed a conscious? Definitely the hero America needs. He’s gonna pump that Epstein well as long as he can because the rest of his record is abysmal.

He is emblematic of everything wrong with American politics. He shares that distinction with many, most notably Mitch McConnell, Lindsay Graham, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders to name a few, whose opinions change with the polls.
 
Sarge said:
Ro Khanna? The guy who was solidly behind a nazi loving rapist until Platner’s polling cratered and then suddenly developed a conscious? Definitely the hero America needs. He’s gonna pump that Epstein well as long as he can because the rest of his record is abysmal.

He is emblematic of everything wrong with American politics. He shares that distinction with many, most notably Mitch McConnell, Lindsay Graham, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders to name a few, whose opinions change with the polls.
Click to expand...
Scratch Lindsey off the list.
 
Last edited:
Sarge said:
Ro Khanna? The guy who was solidly behind a nazi loving rapist until Platner’s polling cratered and then suddenly developed a conscious? Definitely the hero America needs. He’s gonna pump that Epstein well as long as he can because the rest of his record is abysmal.

He is emblematic of everything wrong with American politics. He shares that distinction with many, most notably Mitch McConnell, Lindsay Graham, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders to name a few, whose opinions change with the polls.
Click to expand...
Now do Massie! Thought so…
 
Troglodyte said:
They are. You’re an idiot for trying to argue otherwise. Here…


Click to expand...

Seriously, you consider that a rebuttal? Son, it doesn't even address the facks.

Let me repost this, and read it SLOOOOWWWWW this time. Color coded so you can follow along. Not all arrests involve releasing names, often...

In the United States, an arrest does not automatically mean the person's name will be made public, although in many cases it does become publicly available through government records. It depends on the jurisdiction, the type of offense, and applicable laws.
  • Police blotters and arrest logs: Many police departments and sheriff's offices routinely publish the names of people who have been arrested, along with the charges, date, and location. Others publish only limited information or nothing at all.
  • Jail records: If someone is booked into a county or city jail, their booking information—including their name, mugshot (where permitted), charges, and bond amount—is often a public record. Some jurisdictions no longer release mugshots routinely due to privacy laws.
  • Court records: Once charges are filed in court, the defendant's name is generally part of the public court record unless the case has been sealed.
  • Juveniles: Arrests involving minors are typically confidential, with exceptions for certain serious crimes or when a juvenile is charged as an adult.
  • Protected or sealed cases:Some arrests may not be publicly disclosed if:
    • the records are sealed by a court,
    • the arrest involves certain protected victims or witnesses,
    • disclosure would compromise an ongoing investigation,
    • state law limits release of the information.
  • Federal arrests: Federal agencies often announce significant arrests through press releases, but many federal arrests receive no public announcement beyond the court records.
 
Troglodyte said:
You are indeed in a bubble…

Click to expand...
I’m in no bubble, but you’re in a cult.
I understood the ruling you idiot.
Posting the same shyt doesn’t change anything.

Again, Because the Department of Justice (DOJ) has shielded the redacted information, the judge ordered the government to either unredact the documents or legally justify each individual redaction.

The judges opinion was that Blanche redacted too much and held too much. I doesn’t mean that he actually did. That will be determined after he complies with the judge order to justify each individual redaction you moron.
 
Last edited:
Troglodyte said:
Now do Massie! Thought so…
Click to expand...
your next original thought will be your own, and that won't happen since your two gray brain cells are jockeying for position to feel Tibs pound the sphincter.

you're in a cuLt.

1783945802263.png
btw - posts 18,459 and 18,460 were direct inquiries to you, which you've chosen to ignore and skip over. why? oh, because you're full of shiite muslims.
 
This new Trump has been a wild ride. Hard to believe that Team Trump for one reason or another has essentially lost Tucker Carlson, Matt Gaetz, Tulsi Gabbard, Kristi Noem, Lindsey Graham. Pam Bondi, Alex Jones, Elon Musk, and Hulk Hogan. In less than 2 years. And gained and lost again Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro.
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
Seriously, you consider that a rebuttal? Son, it doesn't even address the facks.

Let me repost this, and read it SLOOOOWWWWW this time. Color coded so you can follow along. Not all arrests involve releasing names, often...

In the United States, an arrest does not automatically mean the person's name will be made public, although in many cases it does become publicly available through government records. It depends on the jurisdiction, the type of offense, and applicable laws.
  • Police blotters and arrest logs: Many police departments and sheriff's offices routinely publish the names of people who have been arrested, along with the charges, date, and location. Others publish only limited information or nothing at all.
  • Jail records: If someone is booked into a county or city jail, their booking information—including their name, mugshot (where permitted), charges, and bond amount—is often a public record. Some jurisdictions no longer release mugshots routinely due to privacy laws.
  • Court records: Once charges are filed in court, the defendant's name is generally part of the public court record unless the case has been sealed.
  • Juveniles: Arrests involving minors are typically confidential, with exceptions for certain serious crimes or when a juvenile is charged as an adult.
  • Protected or sealed cases:Some arrests may not be publicly disclosed if:
    • the records are sealed by a court,
    • the arrest involves certain protected victims or witnesses,
    • disclosure would compromise an ongoing investigation,
    • state law limits release of the information.
  • Federal arrests: Federal agencies often announce significant arrests through press releases, but many federal arrests receive no public announcement beyond the court records.
Click to expand...
😂 “Does not automatically” does not mean NOT or NEVER. The exception isn’t the rule.
 
Hypocycloids said:
I’m in no bubble, but you’re in a cult.
I understood the ruling you idiot.
Posting the same shyt doesn’t change anything.

Again, Because the Department of Justice (DOJ) has shielded the redacted information, the judge ordered the government to either unredact the documents or legally justify each individual redaction.

The judges opinion was that Blanche redacted too much and held too much. I doesn’t mean that he actually did. That will be determined after he complies with the judge order to justify each individual redaction you moron.
Click to expand...
Non-compliance is breaking the law, moron.
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
Seriously, you consider that a rebuttal? Son, it doesn't even address the facks.

Let me repost this, and read it SLOOOOWWWWW this time. Color coded so you can follow along. Not all arrests involve releasing names, often...

In the United States, an arrest does not automatically mean the person's name will be made public, although in many cases it does become publicly available through government records. It depends on the jurisdiction, the type of offense, and applicable laws.
  • Police blotters and arrest logs: Many police departments and sheriff's offices routinely publish the names of people who have been arrested, along with the charges, date, and location. Others publish only limited information or nothing at all.
  • Jail records: If someone is booked into a county or city jail, their booking information—including their name, mugshot (where permitted), charges, and bond amount—is often a public record. Some jurisdictions no longer release mugshots routinely due to privacy laws.
  • Court records: Once charges are filed in court, the defendant's name is generally part of the public court record unless the case has been sealed.
  • Juveniles: Arrests involving minors are typically confidential, with exceptions for certain serious crimes or when a juvenile is charged as an adult.
  • Protected or sealed cases:Some arrests may not be publicly disclosed if:
    • the records are sealed by a court,
    • the arrest involves certain protected victims or witnesses,
    • disclosure would compromise an ongoing investigation,
    • state law limits release of the information.
  • Federal arrests: Federal agencies often announce significant arrests through press releases, but many federal arrests receive no public announcement beyond the court records.
Click to expand...
Pish, you're merely an attorney with the arrogance to believe that you're more versed on this subject than Flog and Tic Tok..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top