• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Economic TRIUMPH! All hail the wise diuretcion of Dear Leader!

Superman

You may worship me
Moderator
Forefather
Contributor
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
21,073
Reaction score
24,543
Points
113
Location
Trampa, FL
http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/national/us-hiring-falls-to-worst-in-5-years-rate-drops-to-47-pct

US hiring falls to worst in 5 years; rate drops to 4.7 percent


WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. employers drastically slowed their hiring in May, adding just 38,000, the fewest in more than 5 years and a sign of concern after the economy barely grew in the first three months of the year.

At the same time, the unemployment rate tumbled to 4.7 percent from 5 percent, the Labor Department said Friday, its lowest point since November 2007. The rate fell for a problematic reason: Nearly a half-million jobless Americans stopped looking for work and so were no longer officially counted as unemployed.

The much-weaker-than-expected jobs report will raise doubts that the Federal Reserve will increase the short-term interest rate it controls at its next meeting in mid-June or perhaps even at its subsequent meeting in late July. Many analysts had expected an increase by July.

It is also likely to roil the presidential race, as the expected GOP nominee Donald Trump called it a "terrible jobs report" and a "bombshell" on Twitter. The figure comes just days after President Obama touted his economic record in Elkhart, Ind.

The government has estimated that the economy grew at just a 0.8 percent annual rate in the January-March quarter.

Hiring in March and April was also revised lower, with job gains now just 123,000 in April, down from an initial estimate of 160,000. March was downgraded to 186,000 from 208,000.

Job gains have now averaged just 116,000 in the past three months, down sharply from an average of 230,000 in the 12 months ending in April.

The total was lowered by the Verizon workers' strike, which depressed hiring in the telecom sector by 34,000.

Still, job losses were widespread: Manufacturers cut 10,000 positions, while construction firms cut 15,000. Temporary help firms shed 21,000 jobs. Retailers, hotels and restaurants added jobs, but at a slower pace than recent months.

Friday's dismal jobs report was a surprise in part because most recent economic reports have been encouraging: Consumer spending surged in April. Americans ramped up purchases of autos and other big-ticket items, like appliances.

Home sales and construction have also increased. Sales of new homes reached an eight-year high in April.

Even manufacturing, which has suffered from weak growth overseas and a strong dollar that has depressed exports, is showing signs of stabilizing. Factory activity expanded in May for a third straight month, according to a survey of purchasing managers.

In December, after months of economic improvement, the Fed raised its benchmark short-term rate after pegging it near zero for seven years. In March, officials indicated that they expected just two additional increases this year.

Chair Janet Yellen has long made it clear that she studies a "dashboard" of job market data to help assess the economy's health, rather than a single number such as hiring or unemployment.

Fed officials may not keep investors guessing for long: Yellen will speak Monday in a closely watched address that may show how she has interpreted Friday's report.

And Lael Brainard, a Fed official who is a longtime skeptic of raising rates, will speak later Friday. Any sign that Brainard is willing to accept higher rates would likely be seen as evidence that Yellen — and the Fed — may act soon.

Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 
Very, very bad jobs report. Obama has no where to hide on this one.

It's so bad it might stop the feds from their hope to raise interest rates at the end of the month. The fed is desperately trying to inch rates up so that in the event ANOTHER democrat gets elected and the economy starts to tank again due to over-regulation and over-taxation, they have the ability to lower rates in the future as a stimulus to make up for bad economic policy.

Unfortunately, even when things are "good" to a democrat, they really aren't good enough for economists and people that know what the hell they are looking at.
 
That unemployment # is total bull ****.

It doesn't include those who are out of the system and don't even look for jobs anymore. 4.7% my ***. More like 30%.

Obama was on TV 2 days ago bragging about the economy; he was smiling, laughing and yucking it up. He thinks everything is in fine shape.
 
Very, very bad jobs report. Obama has no where to hide on this one.

It's so bad it might stop the feds from their hope to raise interest rates at the end of the month. The fed is desperately trying to inch rates up so that in the event ANOTHER democrat gets elected and the economy starts to tank again due to over-regulation and over-taxation, they have the ability to lower rates in the future as a stimulus to make up for bad economic policy.

Unfortunately, even when things are "good" to a democrat, they really aren't good enough for economists and people that know what the hell they are looking at.

Oh, since March 2016 Obama has been hanging out in Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Vietman, and Japan.

Tax cuts and deregulation, combined with fairer trade policies are badly needed.

We need the next Ronald Reagan, and to kick the media " reporting " to the curb.
 
What is diuretcion?

a play on words. one would think that an esteemed New York Times Bestselling Author would understand that.
1. Diuretic
2. Direction

then again, ******, when DOES your goddamn book come out?
 
What does your clever play on words mean????? Makes no sense to me.
 
What does your clever play on words mean????? Makes no sense to me.

just go write your book

either refute the facts stated or just shut up....typical liberal bullshit. nothing to counter the argument with so you try to take it off on a tangent that just doesn't ******* matter
 
http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/10/news/economy/job-openings/index.html

Job openings are at all-time record levels. I don't know of anyone that has trouble finding a job.
1 month report is just a blip, doesn't hold much weight. Romney promised 6 million jobs in his
first 4 years, Obama is on pace to have 12 million in those same 4. I guess Romney was an
underachiever. Luck he didn't win.

Perfecting the art of taking a tidbit of information and making it a bigger story than it is, isn't a very
productive use of your time. A lot of you seem to have a lot of time to waste, since your experts at
doing this.
 
http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/10/news/economy/job-openings/index.html

Job openings are at all-time record levels. I don't know of anyone that has trouble finding a job.
1 month report is just a blip, doesn't hold much weight. Romney promised 6 million jobs in his
first 4 years, Obama is on pace to have 12 million in those same 4. I guess Romney was an
underachiever. Luck he didn't win.

Perfecting the art of taking a tidbit of information and making it a bigger story than it is, isn't a very
productive use of your time. A lot of you seem to have a lot of time to waste, since your experts at
doing this.

then you don't know many people

job openings are low because companies are eliminating positions every day.

I know dozens of people with good work histories and solid experience looking for work

this isn't a blip

and you are either a liar or a ******* idiot....more than likely both
 
We need to define these economic statistics back to where they make sense about what they are trying to measure, and keep it that way from admin to admin so we can really judge policy effectiveness. You can't stop counting unemployed people just because they haven't been looking for a job.
 
http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/10/news/economy/job-openings/index.html

Job openings are at all-time record levels. I don't know of anyone that has trouble finding a job.
1 month report is just a blip, doesn't hold much weight. Romney promised 6 million jobs in his
first 4 years, Obama is on pace to have 12 million in those same 4. I guess Romney was an
underachiever. Luck he didn't win.

Perfecting the art of taking a tidbit of information and making it a bigger story than it is, isn't a very
productive use of your time. A lot of you seem to have a lot of time to waste, since your experts at
doing this.

That's what happens when a company turns 1 good full time job into 2 ****** part time jobs because that's what O's moronic economic policies have dictated.

Funny how whenever Bush had some good jobs news, the media proclaimed them all burger flipper jobs and no big deal. Now they will tout part time burger flipper as a win. At least until the fast food places replace their workers with robots and self service kiosks which is already happening as a result of idiotic minimum wage hikes.

The only good economic news is due to fracking, which he opposes.
 
http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/10/news/economy/job-openings/index.html

Job openings are at all-time record levels. I don't know of anyone that has trouble finding a job.
1 month report is just a blip, doesn't hold much weight. Romney promised 6 million jobs in his
first 4 years, Obama is on pace to have 12 million in those same 4. I guess Romney was an
underachiever. Luck he didn't win.

Perfecting the art of taking a tidbit of information and making it a bigger story than it is, isn't a very
productive use of your time. A lot of you seem to have a lot of time to waste, since your experts at
doing this.

You are completely moronic, aren't you?

Forecasters, economists, democrats, whoever was expecting 160,000 NEW JOBS.

They got 25% of that. You don't think that's an issue? You don't think that's a complete "woops, I guess I was wrong" moment for economists that kind of study these things for a living? You don't see the double speak of Obama PROMOTING 220,000 jobs in January as validation of his policies yet now it's going to be "Republican Stonewalling" that is the reason for the drastic decline?

And this isn't just a blip on the radar screen. Job growth has been under performing ever since January. This is just a huge culmination of what Americans have long suspected and know and which Obama refuses to accept: his "recovery" is barely a recovery at all.

He can try and sugarcoat this like everything else. I'm sure his snake tongue will read a great teleprompter speech you and the liberal media will just eat right up.

This is a DISASTER of a report. There is no denying it unless you know absolutely nothing about economics.
 
http://money.cnn.com/2016/05/10/news/economy/job-openings/index.html

Job openings are at all-time record levels. I don't know of anyone that has trouble finding a job.
1 month report is just a blip, doesn't hold much weight. Romney promised 6 million jobs in his
first 4 years, Obama is on pace to have 12 million in those same 4. I guess Romney was an
underachiever. Luck he didn't win.

Perfecting the art of taking a tidbit of information and making it a bigger story than it is, isn't a very
productive use of your time. A lot of you seem to have a lot of time to waste, since your experts at
doing this.

you simple fool.

http://www.snagajob.com/resources/why-is-there-a-job-posted-if-theyre-not-hiring/

Why is there a job posted if they’re not hiring?
by: Amy White

Getting hired when an employer isn't hiring
Snagajob members sometimes report that when they follow up on a job application, the employer says the company isn’t hiring. Understandably that sometimes leaves people confused and irritated – why post a job that’s not available? But it’s not a waste of time to apply to these jobs; employers have unpredictable hiring needs, and we have heard from many members in the middle of a long, tough job search who randomly got a job offer from an application they’d all but forgotten they submitted.


http://theagencyworldwide.com/2014/01/26/us-companies-are-posting-more-jobs-but-filling-few/

By CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. employers have more job openings than at any other time in nearly five years. That’s in part because they seem in no hurry to fill them.

And it helps explain why the job market remains tight and unemployment high. Even as openings have surged 11 percent in the past year, the number of people hired each month has declined.

Why so many openings yet so few hires?

Economists point to several factors: Some unemployed workers lack the skills employers want. Some companies may not be offering enough pay. And staffing firms and employment experts say that in a still-fragile economy, many businesses seem hesitant to commit to new hires. They appear to be holding out for the perfect candidate.

“We’re living in a fear-based environment right now,” says Kim First, CEO of The Agency Worldwide, a recruiting firm for pharmaceutical and biotech companies.

Those who do have jobs these days are unlikely to lose them. Layoffs have sunk to a pre-recession level.

But First says that companies feel they can’t afford to take a risk by hiring someone who doesn’t appear to be an ideal fit for the job they’ve advertised.

“They are really reluctant to make that leap of faith,” she says. Companies “need someone to come in and hit the ground running.”

The Labor Department said Tuesday that the number of job openings rose 8.7 percent in February from January to a seasonally adjusted 3.93 million. That was the most since May 2008.

At the same time, companies hired a seasonally adjusted 4.4 million people, just 2.8 percent more than in January. And hiring remained lower than it was a year ago, when it was nearly 4.5 million.

The figures suggest that the Great Recession may have transformed the job market in ways that economists still don’t fully understand. Normally, more openings lead, over time, to stronger hiring and steadily lower unemployment.

Yet in May 2008, when job openings were as numerous as they are now, the unemployment rate was 5.4 percent. Now, it’s 7.6 percent.

And in 2007, before the recession began, employers were hiring an average of 5.2 million people a month — 15 percent more than in February this year.

The Labor Department’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover survey, or JOLTS, reveals the total number of people hired and laid off each month. It differs from the department’s jobs report, which provides each month’s net job gain or loss. But by quantifying total hiring and layoffs, the JOLTS can paint a fuller picture of what employers are doing.

From November through February, employers added a net average of about 220,000 jobs a month. The JOLTS report shows that a big reason for those gains was that layoffs fell. Companies cut 1.5 million jobs in January — the fewest since the JOLTS data was first compiled in December 2000.

The number of people quitting is still low compared with pre-recession levels, though it’s risen in recent months. A low number of people quitting reduces opportunities for those out of work. About 2.3 million people quit in February, 7 percent higher than a year ago but below the average of nearly 2.9 million that were quitting each month when the recession began in December 2007.

Jason Faberman, an economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, likens the job market to a game of musical chairs: If no one gets up, there isn’t any room for anyone else to sit.

In March, U.S. employers added a net 88,000 jobs, the fewest in nine months and less than half the pace of the previous six months. At the same time, the increase in openings suggests that net job gains may strengthen in coming months.

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has said that total hiring, as gauged by the JOLTS report, is something he and other Fed officials track in assessing the job market. The Fed has said it plans to keep short-term interest rates at record lows at least until unemployment falls to 6.5 percent.

Steven Davis, an economics professor at the University of Chicago, says his research shows that companies aren’t filling jobs as fast as they did in the past. Jobs now remain unfilled for an average of 25 days. That’s up from about 16 days in mid-2003, when the job market was recovering from the previous recession.

Davis cites several reasons for the change. Companies may be uncertain about the outlook for the economy. And if the outlook worsens after a company posts a job opening, they may not fill it.

With unemployment high, the cost of missing a good hire doesn’t seem as high, Davis says. Managers may figure they can always find someone just as qualified later.

And a bigger proportion of job openings in the United States is in health and education. Those jobs take longer to fill, partly because of higher skill and education requirements. Lower-skilled jobs in areas such as construction, which are typically filled more quickly, have declined.

Some economists also say that there may be a mismatch between the skills the unemployed have and what employers are seeking. Some manufacturers, for example, have reported difficulty in finding higher-skilled machinists, according to the Fed’s Beige Book, which provides anecdotal information on economic conditions across the country.

“It’s a different labor market than we’ve had in the past,” says Cooper Howes, an economist at Barclays. “We have to readjust our expectations of what a healthy labor market looks like.”

All of which could make it harder to reduce unemployment. Howes says a “normal” level of U.S. unemployment may now be around 7 percent, rather than 5 percent to 6 percent.

Other economists doubt that a skills mismatch is playing a significant role. Elise Gould, an economist at the liberal Economic Policy Institute, says there are more unemployed people than jobs in nearly every industry. That suggests that a broad slowdown in the economy is to blame for still-high unemployment, rather than a shortage of qualified workers in certain industries.

Some companies may also have slowed hiring after steep government spending cuts began taking effect March 1. Those cuts are expected to shave about a half-point from economic growth this year.

Peter Cappelli, a management professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business, says that until employers fill a job opening, they feel they’re “saving a ton of money by leaving the position open.”

That dynamic won’t change, Cappelli says, until the economy grows fast enough that people feel comfortable about quitting to find jobs elsewhere.

___

AP Economics Writer Paul Wiseman contributed to this report.
 
You are completely moronic, aren't you?
This is a DISASTER of a report. There is no denying it unless you know absolutely nothing about economics.

Like Chuck said, this gang in Washington likes to spin fairy tail numbers around like pixy dust.

http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LE...numbers//RK=0/RS=mRYUhkQbDiOhQgp4g1PjFLQdtHU-
The Labor Department said the pace of hiring slowed sharply in May.

U.S. employers added a seasonally adjusted 38,000 jobs in May, the worst monthly performance since September 2010. The latest number was well below the 158,000 forecast by economists.

The unemployment rate was 4.7% in May, showing that 7.4 million Americans who wanted a job couldn’t find one last month. ( you believe that ? )

The headline unemployment rate gets much of the attention, but it’s not the only measure of labor-market slack. An alternative rate, which includes people looking for work, stuck in part-time jobs or who have been discouraged about finding a job, held steady at 9.7% in May.

In May, the share of Americans participating in the workforce fell to 62.6%, the lowest level of the year.
 
racist *******.............

Bomma is doing His best to get the white unemployment rate up to what the black unemployment rate is. Fair is fair.
 
34,000 of the unemployed in May were Verizon workers on strike. In June these same 34,000 will be counted as jobs.
The number counting isn't perfect from month to month.

ADP's calculation had 173,000 jobs created in May.
 
34,000 of the unemployed in May were Verizon workers on strike. In June these same 34,000 will be counted as jobs.
The number counting isn't perfect from month to month.

ADP's calculation had 173,000 jobs created in May.

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
http://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0LE...psit.htm/RK=0/RS=b7xM9stJrn4YbXrgypkD9OOkzAU-

In May, the unemployment rate declined by 0.3 percentage point to 4.7 percent, and
the number of unemployed persons declined by 484,000 to 7.4 million. Both measures
had shown little movement from August to April. (See table A-1.)

Among the major worker groups, the unemployment rates for adult men (4.3 percent),
adult women (4.2 percent), Whites (4.1 percent), and Hispanics (5.6 percent)
declined in May. The rates for teenagers (16.0 percent), Blacks (8.2 percent), and
Asians (4.1 percent) showed little or no change. (See tables A-1, A-2, and A-3.)
 
What exactly did this Gov't do over the past month that made this change?
Ooh, ooh, Pick me !
Nothing. Just like over the past 8 years. The free economy succeeds despite what out gov't does, when left alone.

Three restaurants in my area that I liked closed this week.
 
Top