• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Farmers Applaud Trump for Repealing EPA’s Rule to Regulate Water On Their Land

Spike

Regular Member
Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
24,914
Reaction score
11,537
Points
113
**** you Obama


Farmers are applauding President Donald Trump’s executive order Tuesday that reverses the Environmental Protection Agency’s “Waters of the United States” (WOTUS) rule, which gave the agency virtually limitless authority to regulate water on private land.

Introduced under Barack Obama, the WOTUS expanded the EPA’s interpretation of the Clean Water Act to include, as Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said, “almost any piece of land that gets wet and puddles.”

The Clean Water Act was intended to apply to “navigable” waters, but WOTUS interpreted that extremely broadly, so that it included waters with a “significant nexus” with navigable waters — in other words, taking in water that might eventually flow into navigable waterways.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/02/farmers-applaud-trump-repealing-epa-water-rule/

----------------------------------



Wyoming welder, facing $16M in fines, beats EPA in battle over stock pond

A Wyoming man threatened with $16 million in fines over the building of a stock pond reached a settlement with the Environment Protection Agency, allowing him to keep the pond without a federal permit or hefty fine.

1462908982236.jpg


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ines-beats-epa-in-battle-over-stock-pond.html
 
More winning



EPA reverses course, won’t seek emissions, equipment data from drillers

The Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday reversed an Obama-era plan to collect massive amounts of data from oil-and-gas companies — information that ultimately would’ve been used as the basis for new federal regulations on methane.

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt said the requests made by the prior administration constituted unnecessary burdens on the energy industry. His action also seems to signal that the EPA will not pursue any new methane regulations anytime in the foreseeable future.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/mar/2/epa-wont-seek-emissions-equipment-data-drillers/
 
Spike said:
Wyoming welder, facing $16M in fines, beats EPA in battle over stock pond

A Wyoming man threatened with $16 million in fines over the building of a stock pond reached a settlement with the Environment Protection Agency, allowing him to keep the pond without a federal permit or hefty fine.

So if I understand this correctly, you get fined if you remove a wetland and you get fined if you create a wetland.
 
So if I understand this correctly, you get fined if you remove a wetland and you get fined if you create a wetland.

The EPA wanted to control all water rights on your property, **** them and Obama. It was a power grab and attack on property rights They wanted all serfs to obey their king.

Too bad *****. OVERRULED!
 
The EPA wanted to control all water rights on your property, **** them and Obama. It was a power grab and attack on property rights They wanted all serfs to obey their king.

Too bad *****. OVERRULED!

racism it is, then.
 
So are folks in Maryland allowed to capture rain water again without fear of taxation and jail?
 
So are folks in Maryland allowed to capture rain water again without fear of taxation and jail?

what's that? some rain barrel restrictions?

Don't let the heatlh dept in FL know you are collecting water! - they will fine your *** for breeding Zika mosquitoes
 
So are folks in Maryland allowed to capture rain water again without fear of taxation and jail?

don't you dare ******* do it, and if you do, you better give a bounty to the fearless king and his heavy-handed tax enforcers or we'll lop your ******* head off, cretin.
 
So are folks in Maryland allowed to capture rain water again without fear of taxation and jail?

Wait, are you confusing this with the rain tax? I'm a Maryland resident. As far as I know, no one is taxed for collecting rainwater. In fact, one source I referenced says that collecting rainwater is encouraged.

The infamous Rain Tax was passed by Martin 'Tax our way to Prosperity' O'Malley. Once known as HB97, we are taxed based upon the amount of rain that has fallen.
 
The infamous Rain Tax was passed by Martin 'Tax our way to Prosperity' O'Malley. Once known as HB97, we are taxed based upon the amount of rain that has fallen.

That is ******* awesome!!
 
Top