All I'm saying is that everyone looked at the 2005 playoff run and said, oh Cowher changed his approach and came out throwing, they did come out throwing, but that wasn't new, like I said 1994 AFCCG, we threw the ball all over the lot even though we were a very good running team that season, same in 2001, we were a very good running team, but we threw the ball a ton in the AFCCG because NE was very good vs the run, we threw alot in Ben's rookie year early in games, then killed the game with the running game. That's why I say everyone just throws the Martyball narrative around without actually looking into games, mainly because he coached under Marty. No matter the era though, non franchise QB's win playoff games, so that's a piss poor excuse for Tomlin, saying he shouldn't be expected to win a playoff game because his QB. If you're a HOF Head Coach, you should be able to win a game here or there without a franchise guy, he's not even competitive.Marty Ball is not a narrative, It was a thing. And sure the football was passed back then, when did the West Coast offense first appear? Yeah, in the 1970s.
So, some teams leaned more on the pass in that era, but the majority did not. The status quo was: run the ball, good defense. This was not a Steelers thing as Tomlin said when he was hired..it was a league wide thing.
West Coast replaces a lot of runs with short passes, of course.
I don't disagree with you completely. Like I said in my other post: the thing Cowher had over Tomlin is he could draft/find great players, and he let his coaches coach....he was also stubborn.
I believe he would have won another Bowl or two in the few years after his retirement, but I can also see him not getting anywhere just like Tomlin if he had to coach in this day and age.
We'll never know.
