• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Men of sleet: The snowflakes behind Trump’s macho-man act

Elfiero

Banned
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Messages
3,622
Reaction score
494
Points
83
Men of sleet: The snowflakes behind Trump’s macho-man act


The president's inner circle is stuffed with thin-skinned men who can't handle being criticized.

ALAN PYKE
SEP 1, 2017, 1:16 PM

The fuel in President Donald Trump’s rise to power has many ingredients, but they are all funneled through the same engine: TV and internet chatter.

The racism, xenophobia, and lizard-brain tribalism Trump tapped into over the past two-plus years of campaigning and slipshod attempts at governing find a natural intersection online — where anonymous message board flamewars have reshaped human conversational norms — and on cable TV debate shows. In either venue, what matters most to winning an argument is the appearance of superiority, the performance of victory. Information, evidence, and rhetorical prowess are secondary at best.

The web-shouting creche that nurtured Trump’s white-grievance politics into a wave strong enough to sweep him to 300 Electoral College votes last November has a few signature traits. Chief among them is the accusation that one’s opponents are simply oversensitive little babies, too thin-skinned to hack it in Real America, too motivated by their precious feelings and insufficiently tough to be worthy of playing a role in shaping a society shared by 320 million individuals.

These “snowflakes,” in the parlance of Trump fans, obsess about small things that don’t matter — racist behavior, for example — while ignoring the big things that do — terrorism abroad, hedonism at home — and encouraging a new generation of Americans to follow suit. The term is “simultaneously emasculating and infantilizing, suggesting fragility but also an inflated sense of a person’s own specialness and a naive embrace of difference,” Amanda Hess wrote in a New York Times Magazine piece on the “snowflake” renaissance.

Yet for all their derision toward the perceived hypersensitivity of liberals and leftists, Trump fans find themselves rooting for a guy who surrounds himself with snowflakes. Trump’s political power circle and actual cabinet are littered with these melting crystalline men who play tough among friends but go all wobbly when faced with disagreement.

Trump is himself given to flurries of snowy indignation, of course, as anyone unfortunate enough to follow the president on Twitter is well aware. The media is unfair, terribly unfair to his Donaldness. If the pundits aren’t getting under his skin, it’s the protesters, or the federal investigators piecing together his interactions with the Russian government during the election, or the GOP lawmakers who dared mumble out some mild criticism of his race-baiting stewardship of the American republic.

But to focus on Trump’s own high-profile blizzard risks missing the drifts piling up elsewhere.

Take Attorney General Jeff Sessions, for example. The nation’s top law enforcement official, the number-one cop on the beat for the man he says was “exceptionally proud to have run as the law and order President,” can’t stand criticism. He can’t even take being giggled at in public, as it happens: Federal prosecutors in his employ will try a second time to convict a woman arrested for laughing heartily at Sessions’ confirmation hearing after one senator praised the then-nominee’s civil rights record. A judge threw out Deborah Fairooz’s first conviction, seeming to put an end to the silly ordeal. But now Sessions’ troopers will “argue that, even if the officer was wrong to arrest Fairooz, she didn’t have the right to loudly object to her treatment,” as the Huffington Post’s Ryan Reilly puts it.

Bottom line: The United States Attorney General is committing federal resources and court system time to a second criminal trial for a woman who laughed at him. It’s a snowflake sundae with a wasteful-spending cherry on top.

Sessions is far from the only cabinet official to go all shaky knees and twitching spleen in the face of criticism. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke may be a Navy SEAL, but he’s packed on some snowflake pounds since leaving the service. Pressed on his snubbing of tribal leaders while mulling the fate of key national monuments in the American southwest, Zinke blew his top on a woman named Cassandra Begay. “Be nice,” Zinke said, wheeling on Begay and standing over her with a finger in her face. “Be nice. Don’t be rude.” He did not answer her question.

If Zinke popping his top at a taxpayer asking him a straightforward question doesn’t move you, consider instead his team’s reported intervention in the Senate debate over Trumpcare. With the Republican party’s long-suffering war against the Affordable Care Act just a few votes shy of triumph in July, the administration knew who it had to convince. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) wasn’t ready to go along with leadership’s plan. Rather than engage her disagreements and persuade her on the merits, Zinke — whose agency doesn’t run health care policy but does wield huge power over gigantic wilderness-heavy states like Alaska — jumped in with threats. Vote with Trump, the secretary’s office warned, or Zinke would close the federal faucet.

Then there’s David Clarke — no longer, from Friday at midnight, the sheriff of Milwaukee County, and a close political ally of Trump’s though not (yet) an employee.

Clarke’s reputation is built on swagger, all “large cowboy hats and fake medals” in the words of Reason’s C.J. Ciaramella. He routinely ridicules his critics in snowflake-adjacent terms, playing a game of tougher-than-you to swat aside enemies both generic (liberal protesters) and specific (the Milwaukee County official investigating him for abuse of power).

Which makes it strange that Clarke couldn’t handle when a Wisconsin resident saw him on an airplane last year and had the temerity to…stare at him and shake his head slowly in disgust. After the staring incident, which attorneys Clarke hired would later describe as “physically threatening” in court documents, the sheriff called for backup. He instructed on-duty deputies to come meet his plane at the gate, detain the man who’d dared convey his disapproval to the sheriff in person, and interrogate him. No need for an arrest, Clarke told his fellow public employees, “unless he becomes an ******* with your guys.”

“Question for him is why he said anything to me. Why didn’t he just keep his mouth shut?” the sheriff went on, detailing the pressing investigative necessity for the gate-side shakedown of a taxpayer.

https://thinkprogress.org/all-the-presidents-snowflakes-2bba6a955545/


Snowflakes led by King Snowflake himself. Gets punked by the Mexican government.......what more needs to be said?
 
"The racism, xenophobia, and lizard-brain tribalism Trump tapped into over the past two-plus years"

I made it all the way to that line......which is the 2nd sentence in. Then I giggled, shook my head and moved on. It sounds like it was written by a Conservative making fun of how overly pussified and dramatic Liberals of today talk. Thanks I needed a good laugh tonight. The bunch of ya are becoming a parody of yourselves. Try running in hysterical circles with your hands to the sky screaming about Trump and Russia for a month....that seems to help you guys.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: MTC
"The racism, xenophobia, and lizard-brain tribalism Trump tapped into over the past two-plus years"

I made it all the way to that line......which is the 2nd sentence in. Then I giggled, shook my head and moved on. It sounds like it was written by a Conservative making fun of how overly pussified and dramatic Liberals of today talk. Thanks I needed a good laugh tonight. The bunch of ya are becoming a parody of yourselves. Try running in hysterical circles with your hands to the sky screaming about Trump and Russia for a month....that seems to help you guys.

It's an apt description I would say.
 
Men of sleet: The snowflakes behind Trump’s macho-man act


The president's inner circle is stuffed with thin-skinned men who can't handle being criticized.

ALAN PYKE
SEP 1, 2017, 1:16 PM

The fuel in President Donald Trump’s rise to power has many ingredients, but they are all funneled through the same engine: TV and internet chatter.

The racism, xenophobia, and lizard-brain tribalism Trump tapped into over the past two-plus years of campaigning and slipshod attempts at governing find a natural intersection online — where anonymous message board flamewars have reshaped human conversational norms — and on cable TV debate shows. In either venue, what matters most to winning an argument is the appearance of superiority, the performance of victory. Information, evidence, and rhetorical prowess are secondary at best.

The web-shouting creche that nurtured Trump’s white-grievance politics into a wave strong enough to sweep him to 300 Electoral College votes last November has a few signature traits. Chief among them is the accusation that one’s opponents are simply oversensitive little babies, too thin-skinned to hack it in Real America, too motivated by their precious feelings and insufficiently tough to be worthy of playing a role in shaping a society shared by 320 million individuals.

These “snowflakes,” in the parlance of Trump fans, obsess about small things that don’t matter — racist behavior, for example — while ignoring the big things that do — terrorism abroad, hedonism at home — and encouraging a new generation of Americans to follow suit. The term is “simultaneously emasculating and infantilizing, suggesting fragility but also an inflated sense of a person’s own specialness and a naive embrace of difference,” Amanda Hess wrote in a New York Times Magazine piece on the “snowflake” renaissance.

Yet for all their derision toward the perceived hypersensitivity of liberals and leftists, Trump fans find themselves rooting for a guy who surrounds himself with snowflakes. Trump’s political power circle and actual cabinet are littered with these melting crystalline men who play tough among friends but go all wobbly when faced with disagreement.

Trump is himself given to flurries of snowy indignation, of course, as anyone unfortunate enough to follow the president on Twitter is well aware. The media is unfair, terribly unfair to his Donaldness. If the pundits aren’t getting under his skin, it’s the protesters, or the federal investigators piecing together his interactions with the Russian government during the election, or the GOP lawmakers who dared mumble out some mild criticism of his race-baiting stewardship of the American republic.

But to focus on Trump’s own high-profile blizzard risks missing the drifts piling up elsewhere.

Take Attorney General Jeff Sessions, for example. The nation’s top law enforcement official, the number-one cop on the beat for the man he says was “exceptionally proud to have run as the law and order President,” can’t stand criticism. He can’t even take being giggled at in public, as it happens: Federal prosecutors in his employ will try a second time to convict a woman arrested for laughing heartily at Sessions’ confirmation hearing after one senator praised the then-nominee’s civil rights record. A judge threw out Deborah Fairooz’s first conviction, seeming to put an end to the silly ordeal. But now Sessions’ troopers will “argue that, even if the officer was wrong to arrest Fairooz, she didn’t have the right to loudly object to her treatment,” as the Huffington Post’s Ryan Reilly puts it.

Bottom line: The United States Attorney General is committing federal resources and court system time to a second criminal trial for a woman who laughed at him. It’s a snowflake sundae with a wasteful-spending cherry on top.

Sessions is far from the only cabinet official to go all shaky knees and twitching spleen in the face of criticism. Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke may be a Navy SEAL, but he’s packed on some snowflake pounds since leaving the service. Pressed on his snubbing of tribal leaders while mulling the fate of key national monuments in the American southwest, Zinke blew his top on a woman named Cassandra Begay. “Be nice,” Zinke said, wheeling on Begay and standing over her with a finger in her face. “Be nice. Don’t be rude.” He did not answer her question.

If Zinke popping his top at a taxpayer asking him a straightforward question doesn’t move you, consider instead his team’s reported intervention in the Senate debate over Trumpcare. With the Republican party’s long-suffering war against the Affordable Care Act just a few votes shy of triumph in July, the administration knew who it had to convince. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) wasn’t ready to go along with leadership’s plan. Rather than engage her disagreements and persuade her on the merits, Zinke — whose agency doesn’t run health care policy but does wield huge power over gigantic wilderness-heavy states like Alaska — jumped in with threats. Vote with Trump, the secretary’s office warned, or Zinke would close the federal faucet.

Then there’s David Clarke — no longer, from Friday at midnight, the sheriff of Milwaukee County, and a close political ally of Trump’s though not (yet) an employee.

Clarke’s reputation is built on swagger, all “large cowboy hats and fake medals” in the words of Reason’s C.J. Ciaramella. He routinely ridicules his critics in snowflake-adjacent terms, playing a game of tougher-than-you to swat aside enemies both generic (liberal protesters) and specific (the Milwaukee County official investigating him for abuse of power).

Which makes it strange that Clarke couldn’t handle when a Wisconsin resident saw him on an airplane last year and had the temerity to…stare at him and shake his head slowly in disgust. After the staring incident, which attorneys Clarke hired would later describe as “physically threatening” in court documents, the sheriff called for backup. He instructed on-duty deputies to come meet his plane at the gate, detain the man who’d dared convey his disapproval to the sheriff in person, and interrogate him. No need for an arrest, Clarke told his fellow public employees, “unless he becomes an ******* with your guys.”

“Question for him is why he said anything to me. Why didn’t he just keep his mouth shut?” the sheriff went on, detailing the pressing investigative necessity for the gate-side shakedown of a taxpayer.

https://thinkprogress.org/all-the-presidents-snowflakes-2bba6a955545/


Snowflakes led by King Snowflake himself. Gets punked by the Mexican government.......what more needs to be said?

****.
 
And the winner is..........Donald Trump!


and Hillary still blames Bernie!

hahahahahahahahahaha



New Clinton book blasts Sanders for lasting damage in 2016 race

(CNN) — Hillary Clinton casts Bernie Sanders as an unrealistic over-promiser in her new book, according to excerpts posted by a group of Clinton supporters.

She said that his attacks against her during the primary caused “lasting damage” and paved the way for “(Donald) Trump’s ‘Crooked Hillary’ campaign.”

Clinton, in a book that will be released September 12 entitled “What Happened,” said Sanders “had to resort to innuendo and impugning my character” because the two Democrats “agreed on so much.”

DI6NSUDV4AAWRaJ.jpg


http://wtnh.com/2017/09/05/new-clinton-book-blasts-sanders-for-lasting-damage-in-2016-race/
 
trumpmeme14.jpg
 
and Hillary still blames Bernie!

hahahahahahahahahaha



New Clinton book blasts Sanders for lasting damage in 2016 race

(CNN) — Hillary Clinton casts Bernie Sanders as an unrealistic over-promiser in her new book, according to excerpts posted by a group of Clinton supporters.

She said that his attacks against her during the primary caused “lasting damage” and paved the way for “(Donald) Trump’s ‘Crooked Hillary’ campaign.”

Clinton, in a book that will be released September 12 entitled “What Happened,” said Sanders “had to resort to innuendo and impugning my character” because the two Democrats “agreed on so much.”

DI6NSUDV4AAWRaJ.jpg


http://wtnh.com/2017/09/05/new-clinton-book-blasts-sanders-for-lasting-damage-in-2016-race/

The woman will go to her grave without any introspection. Nothing was ever her fault. She was "entitled" to be the FWP. She didn't lose, she was robbed.

No wonder so many of these young people loved her. This was the first election where a mass of generation "Everybody gets a Trophy" got to vote. The generation that never lost anything. The generation that doesn't know how to lose, only how to place blame. That same generation we see after NFL games on this very board - "We didn't lose, it was the refs...that bad call...if Ben had been healthy...we beat ourselves..." You'll never hear them mutter "We weren't good enough...they were the better team...we got our butts beat." There's always a reason for a loss and it's always someone else's fault.

Hillary is no different than the Everybody Gets a Medal generation.

Hillary, you ****** up. You and you alone.
 
"If I can't have my peach pie, I do this!"

csd.gif


"Mommy when we gonna have peach pie already?"
 
but wait it gets better - now a cult classic - Liberal snowflakes!


American Horror Story: Cult Succeeds in Making Terror of the 2016 Election

It'd be too simple to crack a joke about how the real horror story of the new season of American Horror Story is having to relive the 2016 election. After all, aren't we doing that every day, for better or for worse depending on how you voted?

And yet that's exactly what Cult, the seventh season of Ryan Murphy's anthology series on FX which premiers Sept. 5, waltzes into. Its protagonist Ally (Sarah Paulson) is a Michigan voter who assumes her vote for Jill Stein is a safe protest against Hillary Clinton, whom she distrusts but would accept.

When it turns out that Ally was wrong—along with so many of her compatriots who find themselves living in a nation they didn't know as well as they thought—old anxieties come rearing up.

american-horror-stort-cult.jpg


http://time.com/4926673/review-american-horror-story-cult/
 
Yes, we should be thankful for all those deluded Bernie bots


New report confirms what Hillary said in her memoir about Sanders:


"Bernie Sanders’s Revolution Will Doom Democrats’ Hopes of Ever Defeating Trump, Warns Think Tank"


Adopting populist economic policies like those championed by Senator Bernie Sanders will keep the Democratic Party locked out of power, according to a report published Tuesday by centrist think tank Third Way.

The report, based on findings of online focus groups with voters who switched support from Barack Obama in 2012 to Donald Trump in 2016, as well as persuadable African-American, Latino and millennial voters, urges Democrats to instead become “the jobs party.”

The report comes amid much soul searching within the Democratic Party following its crushing losses last November in the presidential election, as well as those for the House, Senate and state legislatures.

In the aftermath, a battle is being waged over the party’s direction between establishment moderates and progressive firebrands like Sanders and Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/bernie-sanders-revolution-doom-democrats-203058553.html
 
More Neo-Socialist sour grapes over losing.
 
In the aftermath, a battle is being waged over the party’s direction between establishment moderates and progressive firebrands like Sanders and Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren.
There's Moderates in the Dem party?
You ain't gonna be the "jobs party" by raising corporate taxes and the minimum wage.
 
In the mind of a paranoid lunatic, I'm sure it is.

Actually that would be you guys: wars on christmas, birth certificates, a suicide bomber underneath the skirt of every Syrian refugee........the list is endless.
 
Top