It is neither an insult nor an accusation. Members of this board have stated, for the record, that they hate Muslims.
When can't decipher your own comments, you need help. Your attacks are Alinsky-esque.
You generalize for one - "given how many of you openly hate Muslims" is at least a few generalizations in one. "Many of you" refers to a "lot" of the board members. You then apply "hate Muslims" to the end of the sentence, and this comes from you blindly attaching "hate" to what are a litany of expressed problems with Islam, the majority of which do not involve hate:
- Concern over the Religion and its teachings that non-believers must be killed
- Concern over the pass our Governments gives to Radical Islamists,
- Concern over the double standards afforded Muslims v Christians (see baking cakes for a gay couple as but one of thousands of double standard examples)
This list could go on, endlessly. Valid, legitimate concerns. But you, in your militant Left style (you're still not a Libertarian, sorry), turn any disagreement a person has, any concern a person has, and makes it 'hate."
Yes, 'some' members of the board have stated they hate Muslims. And the reasons are valid. Islam and the Koran teaches them in 280 verses that any non-believers (that's all of us agreed?) are worthy of being put to death. We are their stated enemies. It's inarguable. For someone to hate an enemy, an enemy that has stated you are worthy of death, is understandable, no?
Then you can't stop your never ending attacks on Israel, having to label her the Apartheid State. Now, if I were like you, this would be the point where I'd point out that (see paragraph 1 above) based on your past comments, you're clearly an anti-semite. But I walk a higher road and won't. Moving on...
You follow it all up with a massive assumptive generalization - that you know what 'everyone' here thinks - that anyone who supports Israel really wanted Israel to go to war with Iran. Talk about a walk off the reservation. I for one, and I'd like to think most here, do not want to see any war at all. But we sure do appreciate having an ally (or once an ally until she was diminished so badly and wrongly by this imposter of a President) with the metal and means to keep an Iran in check. And we view this situation, Obama's terrible diplomacy, as one that strengthened Iran - which it did - while weakening Israel, making all of us a little less safe. He made the worlds largest supporter of state terrorism wealthier and closer to obtaining a deliverable nuclear weapon. That's the facts.
But you couldn't stop there, you had to then re-label everyone again as a 'hate monger,' all of whom want to see Muslims die - and relish in it.
You want to recant that statement you made -
it was neither an insult nor an accusation? As demonstrated, it was insults (plural intended) and accusations (plural again intended).