• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Oregon gun confiscation bill SB719

Superman

You may worship me
Moderator
Forefather
Contributor
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
21,070
Reaction score
24,531
Points
113
Location
Trampa, FL
12 pages of it.

https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2017R1/Downloads/MeasureDocument/SB719

Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:

SECTION 1.
As used in sections 1 to 8 of this 2017 Act:
(1) “Deadly weapon” means:
(a) Any instrument, article or substance specifically designed for and presently capable of causing death or serious physical injury; or
(b) A firearm, whether loaded or unloaded.
(2) “Family or household member” means a spouse, intimate partner, mother, father, child or sibling of the respondent, or any person living
within the same household as the respondent.
(3) “Gun dealer” has the meaning given that term in ORS 166.412.
(4) “Law enforcement agency” means an agency or department of the State of Oregon or of a political subdivision of the State of Oregon whose principal function is the apprehension of criminal offenders.
(5) “Law enforcement officer” means a member of the Oregon State Police, a sheriff, a municipal police officer or an authorized tribal police officer as defined in ORS 181A.680.
(6) “Petitioner” means a person who petitions for an order under sections 1 to 8 of this 2017 Act.
(7) “Respondent” means a person against whom an order is filed under sections 1 to 8 of this 2017 Act.

SECTION 2.
(1) A law enforcement officer or a family or household member of a person may file a petition requesting that the court issue an extreme risk protection order enjoining the person from having in the person’s custody or control, owning, purchasing, possessing or receiving, or attempting to purchase or receive, a deadly weapon.
(2) An extreme risk protection order petition shall be heard by the court and issued or denied on the same day the petition is submitted to the court or on the judicial business day immediately following the day the petition is filed.
(3) The petition for an extreme risk protection order must be supported by a written affidavit signed by the petitioner under oath, or an oral statement taken under oath by the petitioner or any other witness the petitioner may produce.
(4) In determining whether to issue an extreme risk protection order, the court shall consider the following:
(a) A history of suicide threats or attempts or acts of violence by the respondent directed
against another person;
(b) A history of use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force by the respondent against another person;
(c) A previous conviction for:
(A) A misdemeanor involving violence as defined in ORS 166.470;
(B) A stalking offense under ORS 163.732 or 163.750, or a similar offense in another jurisdiction;
(C) An offense constituting domestic violence as defined in ORS 135.230;
(D) Driving under the influence of intoxicants under ORS 813.010 or 813.011; or
(E) An offense involving cruelty or abuse of animals;
(d) Evidence of recent unlawful use of controlled substances;
(e) Previous unlawful and reckless use, display or brandishing of a deadly weapon by the respondent;
(f) A previous violation by the respondent of a court order issued pursuant to ORS 107.716 or 107.718;
(g) Evidence of an acquisition or attempted acquisition within the previous 180 days by the respondent of a deadly weapon; and
(h) Any additional information the court finds to be reliable, including a statement by the
respondent.
(5)(a) The petitioner has the burden of proof at the ex parte hearing.
(b) The petitioner may appear in person or by electronic video transmission.
(c) The court may continue a hearing under this section upon a showing of good cause.
(6)(a) The court shall issue an extreme risk protection order if the court finds by clear and convincing evidence, based on the petition and supporting documentation and after considering a statement by the respondent, if provided, that the respondent presents a risk in
the near future, including an imminent risk, of suicide or of causing physical injury to another person. The court may not include in
the findings any mental health diagnosis or any connection between the risk presented by the respondent and mental illness.
(b) Upon making the findings described in paragraph (a) of this subsection, the court shall issue an extreme risk protection order prohibiting the respondent from having in the respondent’s custody or control, owning, purchasing, possessing or receiving, or attempting
to purchase or receive, a deadly weapon.
(7) An extreme risk protection order issued under this section must include:
(a) A statement of the evidence and the court’s findings supporting issuance of the order;
(b) The date and time the order was issued;
(c) A description of the manner in which the respondent may request a hearing described in subsection (9) of this section;
(d) The address of the court to which a request for a hearing must be sent;
(e) A description of the requirements for surrender of deadly weapons in the respondent’s possession under section 6 of this 2017 Act; and
(f) A statement in substantially the following form:
To the subject of this protection order: An extreme risk protection order has been issued by the court and is now in effect. You
are required to surrender all deadly weapons in your custody, control or possession. You may not have in your custody or control, purchase,
possess, receive, or attempt to purchase or receive, deadly weapons while this order is in effect. You must, within 24 hours, surrender all deadly weapons in your custody, control or possession to (insert name of local law enforcement agency), a gun dealer or a third party
who may lawfully possess the deadly weapons. You must, within 24 hours, surrender to (insert name of local law enforcement agency) any concealed handgun license issued to you. You may request a hearing to contest this order. If you do not request a hearing, the extreme risk protection order against you will be in effect for one year unless terminated by the court. You have the right to request one hearing to terminate this order during the 12 months that this order is in effect starting from the date of this order.
You may seek the advice of an attorney as to any matter connected with this order.
(8)(a) The respondent shall be personally served with both a copy of the extreme risk protection order and a hearing request form described in subsection (9) of this section.
(b) Whenever an extreme risk protective order is served on a respondent, the person serving the order shall immediately deliver to the county sheriff a true copy of proof of service, on which it is stated that personal service of the order was made on the respondent,
and a copy of the order. Proof of service may be made by affidavit or by declaration under penalty of perjury in the form required by ORCP 1 E.
(c) If the person serving the order cannot complete service within 10 days, the person shall notify the petitioner, at the address provided by the petitioner, that the documents have not been served. If the petitioner does not respond within 10 days, the person shall hold the order and petition for future service and file a return to the clerk of the court showing that service was not completed.
(d) Upon receipt of a copy of the order and notice of completion of service by a member of a law enforcement agency, the county sheriff shall immediately enter the order into the Law Enforcement Data System maintained by the Department of State Police and request that the order be entered into the databases of the National Crime Information Center of the United States Department of Justice. If the order was served on the respondent by a person other than a member of a law enforcement agency, the county sheriff shall enter the order into the Law Enforcement Data System, and shall request that the information be entered into the databases of the National Crime Information Center, upon receipt of a true copy of proof of service. The sheriff shall provide the petitioner with a true copy of the proof of service. Entry into the Law Enforcement Data System constitutes notice to all law enforcement agencies of the existence of the order.
Law enforcement agencies shall establish procedures adequate to ensure that an officer at the scene of an alleged violation of the order may be informed of the existence and terms of the order. The order is fully enforceable in any county in this state.
(9)(a) Within 30 days after an extreme risk protection order is served on the respondent under this section, the respondent may request a court hearing using a form prescribed by the State Court Administrator.
(b) If the respondent requests a hearing under paragraph (a) of this Subsection, the clerk of the court shall notify the petitioner and the respondent of the date and time of the hearing and shall supply the petitioner with a copy of the respondent’s request for a hearing. The petitioner and the respondent shall give to the clerk of the court information sufficient to Allow such notification.
(c) The hearing shall occur within 21 days of the date of the respondent’s request for a hearing.
(10) If the respondent fails to request a hearing within 30 days after an extreme risk Protection order is served, the protection order is confirmed by operation of law and is effective for a period of one year from the date the original order was issued or until the order is terminated, whichever is sooner.
(11) A filing fee, service fee or hearing fee may not be charged for proceedings under this section or section 3 or 4 of this 2017 Act.
(12) If the court declines to issue an extreme risk protection order under this section, the court shall state with particularity the reasons for the denial on the record.
 
Wow! That first section is very telling. Those states on the left coast are really pushing off the deep end.
 
Wow! That first section is very telling. Those states on the left coast are really pushing off the deep end.
The two Browns are trying to outdo each other. Now Oregon is working on a bill to fund medical services for children who are brought to this country illegally.
 
Wig's first amendment, just off the top of my head:

The petitioner may appear in person or by electronic video transmission.
Nope. The petitioner must arrive in person and make their case before the person they wish to "disarm/protect" from himself or herself.

Furthermore, is there no stipulation on payment for weapons turned over to dealers or police entities? Guns and other "deadly weapons" have value. Are these people supposed to just give up hundreds or even thousands of dollars to police and gun dealers?
Can I put my "deadly weapon" in a sealed bag verified with no finger-prints on it and have it checked ever 3 months for fingerprints? If any are found can I sue the state for unlawful use of my "sealed deadly weapon"? about $300,000 per fingerpint ought to be justifiable as the only possible reason anyone would EVER take a sealed deadly weapon out of it's container is to do something illegal with it, right?

****, sign me up. I can throw a .22 in a sealed bag and open it ever 3 months for a big ole payday. And you can bet your *** I'd push for the above to be written into the law. I mean by all means let's get these guns off the streets.

And by the way, if an officer has ever drawn a weapon, well I'd say that's a reason for me to recommend he be put on the list of folks to be considered a danger to society, ya? I mean - that guy drew a "deadly weapon"...

I can be a dick with the best of them.

(Also note there are THOUSANDS of soldiers who draw "deadly weapons" every single day. Why we could list ALL OF THEM.) Bring it Oregon. Just ******* Bring It.
 
This is basically a **** your right to due process bill. This will allow any person with a vendetta to make a false statement and abrogate your rights.
 
ogres using terms like "abrogate"

end is near
 
This is basically a **** your right to due process bill. This will allow any person with a vendetta to make a false statement and abrogate your rights.

Well, theoretically, only:

A law enforcement officer or a family or household member of a person may file a petition

That can't, possibly, go wrong. amiright?
 
Well, theoretically, only:



That can't, possibly, go wrong. amiright?

of course not. i mean, there's never, ever, been such a thing as a false rape accusation, or false police report. those terms are all made up.
 
Well, theoretically, only:



That can't, possibly, go wrong. amiright?

Yeah.

Nobody's crazy spouse or hormonal moody teenager would ever swear out a false statement out of spite.
 
Their definition of deadly weapon would also include knives, forks, bug spray, etc.
 
My dick is a deadly weapon. Do I need to turn that over
 
The two Browns are trying to outdo each other. Now Oregon is working on a bill to fund medical services for children who are brought to this country illegally.


Nothing would surprise me coming out of any of those states on the left coast. They're basicly another country in my eyes. One i would never visit unless I was just passing through one of the airports.
 
Hmmm. We're thinking about moving to Oregon. Now I'm thinking it over
 
The Californication of Oregon is complete


Oregon House Democrats pass bill providing free abortions for all, including illegal aliens

An Oregon bill requiring health insurers to provide their customers with free abortions — including illegal immigrants — has advanced to the state Senate after winning approval in the state House with no Republican votes.

House Democrats pushed through the Reproductive Health Equity Act after a nearly two-hour debate over the bill, which would allocate $10.2 million for services related to contraception, sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy, including vasectomies and abortions, in the 2017-19 budget period.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/2/oregon-house-passes-free-abortions-bill-reproducti/
 
Hmmm. We're thinking about moving to Oregon. Now I'm thinking it over

Move to Temple Terrace, Supe is always looking for a new fluffer. He got tired of DoucheBagS when he tried to unionize and started demanding a living wage.
 
Hmmm. We're thinking about moving to Oregon. Now I'm thinking it over

Have a look at the TV show "Portlandia". It pokes fun at the craziness of that place.
 
Couple this with the delicate snowflakes that those places attract and wow.
 
The Californication of Oregon is complete


Oregon House Democrats pass bill providing free abortions for all, including illegal aliens

An Oregon bill requiring health insurers to provide their customers with free abortions — including illegal immigrants — has advanced to the state Senate after winning approval in the state House with no Republican votes.

House Democrats pushed through the Reproductive Health Equity Act after a nearly two-hour debate over the bill, which would allocate $10.2 million for services related to contraception, sexually transmitted diseases and pregnancy, including vasectomies and abortions, in the 2017-19 budget period.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/2/oregon-house-passes-free-abortions-bill-reproducti/

it'll be interesting when they realize that they're quite literally killing their future voting base.
 
Move to Temple Terrace, Supe is always looking for a new fluffer. He got tired of DoucheBagS when he tried to unionize and started demanding a living wage.

Sometimes I hate you more than Supe and that ****** Coolie combined.
 
yeah, ark. have some class. Ogre doesn't like to mix politics with his fluffing responsibilities. and certainly doesn't want it aired on social media.
leaves a bad taste in his mouth.
 
Top