• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Predictions from Earth Day, 1970

Spike

Regular Member
Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2014
Messages
24,914
Reaction score
11,537
Points
113
“Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.” — Harvard biologist George Wald

“Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make. The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.” — Stanford University biologist Paul Ehrlich

“Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born… [By 1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.” — Paul Ehrlich

“It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,” — Denis Hayes, Chief organizer for Earth Day

“Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions…. By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.” — North Texas State University professor Peter Gunter

“In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution… by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half.” — Life magazine

“At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.” — Ecologist Kenneth Watt

“By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate… that there won’t be any more crude oil." — Ecologist Kenneth Watt

“[One] theory assumes that the earth’s cloud cover will continue to thicken as more dust, fumes, and water vapor are belched into the atmosphere by industrial smokestacks and jet planes. Screened from the sun’s heat, the planet will cool, the water vapor will fall and freeze, and a new Ice Age will be born.” — Newsweek magazine

“The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.” - Kenneth Watt

https://ricochet.com/424431/13-ridiculous-predictions-made-earth-day-1970/

--------------------

Where are they all now
 
Wow, good thing immediate action was taken and the trend didn't continue!
But maybe we went too far, from an apparent ice age to global, er, climate change.
 
Cargo cult science
 
The minute sample size of data for "climate science" is hilarious in the context of the Earth's real climate cycles, which are completely independent of whatever humans do.
 
Well, you have to give them credit for trying. CBS ran a story last night from an "expert" saying the polar ice caps have never been as thin as they are now, and of course, it's human caused. I just chuckled, thin as it's ever been? But lemmings will follow.
 
Well, you have to give them credit for trying. CBS ran a story last night from an "expert" saying the polar ice caps have never been as thin as they are now, and of course, it's human caused. I just chuckled, thin as it's ever been? But lemmings will follow.

I'm pretty sure the lemming thing was faked too.


Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
 
All leftists are the same, they are full of hubris and think puny humans can command the earth to change any way they want it. Humans are weak and pathetic compared to the power of our planet. They can't predict earthquakes or volcanoes and they can't stop them - "science" can't save them. You can't control the earth from the thermostat in your cubicle, and so they blame everyone else, like frightened peasants begging the science gods to save them.

You know, the past century has been a relatively quiet period for large volcanic eruptions...


Will Krakatoa rock the world again?

Last time, it killed thousands and changed the weather for five years, now it could be even deadlier..

The pyroclastic cloud alone would kill millions and millions of acres of farm land, the blocking of the sun would diminish crop yields for a couple of years. The eruption and tsunami would easily kill over a million people.

article-1203028-05E123FE000005DC-907_964x411.jpg


article-1203028-05E123F2000005DC-251_964x517.jpg


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...thousands-changed-weather-years-deadlier.html
 
The IPCC folks should demand that Krakatoa pay for its CO2 emissions. They must be able to track these natural emissions, right?
 
I got no fight in a cleaner planet. My problem is, why does it always have to be so extreme? We are all gonna die in 73 days if we don't stop using fossil fuels in the next 10 minutes.
 
Global cooling, global warming. Hmm...I think that's the definition of.......WEATHER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
We could use some global warming in Wyoming these days
 
I got no fight in a cleaner planet. My problem is, why does it always have to be so extreme? We are all gonna die in 73 days if we don't stop using fossil fuels in the next 10 minutes.

Short attention spans, 10 years is a lifetime for young people, the DOOMED hysterical predictions have always been directed at the easily influenced naive herd.



Obama Official Says Bureaucrats Manipulate Climate Stats to Influence Policy


A former member of the Obama administration claims Washington, D.C., often uses “misleading” news releases about climate data to influence public opinion.

Former Energy Department Undersecretary Steven Koonin told The Wall Street Journal Monday that bureaucrats within former President Barack Obama’s administration spun scientific data to manipulate public opinion.

“What you saw coming out of the press releases about climate data, climate analysis, was, I’d say, misleading, sometimes just wrong,” Koonin said, referring to elements within the Obama administration he said were responsible for manipulating climate data.

He pointed to a National Climate Assessment in 2014 showing hurricane activity has increased from 1980 as an illustration of how federal agencies fudged climate data. Koonin said the assessment was technically incorrect.

“What they forgot to tell you, and you don’t know until you read all the way into the fine print, is that it actually decreased in the decades before that,” he said. The U.N. published reports in 2014 essentially mirroring Koonin’s argument.

http://dailysignal.com/2017/04/24/f...manipulate-climate-stats-to-influence-policy/
 
We could use some global warming in Wyoming these days

My favorite was this guy

In 2000, climate researcher David Viner told The Independent, a British newspaper, that within "a few years," snowfall would become "a very rare and exciting event" in Britain. "Children just aren't going to know what snow is," he said. "Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past." In the following years, the U.K. saw some of its largest snowfalls and lowest temperatures since records started being kept in 1914.
 
I'd some some are 6 feet under.

If it was up to Old Billy Nye we would all be six feet under if he had anything to do with it.

a68acabcb38fa2184f766fea1174ad645f02c326.jpeg


Bill Nye is hopeful that the climate deniers will eventually die off

[In] the case of climate change, I think the people who are in denial about it will age out. There are very few millennial aged people who aren’t concerned about climate change. There are a few, but very few. So as the electorate ages, climate change will be taken very seriously.
https://newrepublic.com/minutes/142120/bill-nye-hopeful-climate-deniers-will-eventually-die-off

So yinz deniers better watch your step !
 
Bill Nye is an B.S. engineer - not a climate scientist of any type



I hope it gets warmer - we are still in an ice age


Quaternary glaciation

The Quaternary glaciation, also known as the Pleistocene glaciation or the current ice age, is a series of glacial events separated by interglacial events during the Quaternary period from 2.58 Ma (million years ago) to present.

During this period, ice sheets expanded, notably from out of Antarctica and Greenland, and fluctuating ice sheets occurred elsewhere (for example, the Laurentide ice sheet). The major effects of the ice age are erosion and deposition of material over large parts of the continents, modification of river systems, creation of millions of lakes, changes in sea level, development of pluvial lakes far from the ice margins, isostatic adjustment of the crust, and abnormal winds. It affected oceans, flooding, and biological communities.

The ice sheets themselves, by raising the albedo, affect a major feedback on climate cooling.

During the Quaternary Period, the total volume of land ice, sea level, and global temperature has fluctuated initially on 41,000- and more recently on 100,000-year time scales, as evidenced most clearly by ice cores for the past 800,000 years and marine sediment cores for the earlier period. Over the past 740,000 years there have been eight glacial cycles

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary_glaciation
 
I just saw this well written piece in the AR...


White Environmentalism


Where conservatism and conservation meet.

It’s clear that the environmentalism and loving “the great outdoors” are Stuff White People Like. Every year there are articles complaining how few “people of color” went to America’s national parks, and a Green party is represented in most European parliaments. Something appeals to our people about protecting the natural world and keeping it healthy for generations to come.

There’s a catch: The Left has been allowed nearly to monopolize this issue. Except for the occasional conservative who cites Theodore Roosevelt, the Right makes little effort to join forces with environmentalism. This is an unfortunate legacy of how conservatism fought the Cold War. As a “big tent” coalition against communism or anything that smelled of it, the Right stood against the hippies and their Marxist professors, their pacifism, and their flower power. It saw protesting over the environment as the work of left-wing rabble. But that doesn’t mean the issue is one of the Left. No one on the political spectrum can escape questions of energy and environment.

"Today, environmentalism suffers both from a lack of support from the Right and from its marriage to the Left. Despite their professed “green” policies, liberals are often strongly in favor of mass immigration. Because immigration inflates the population with no regard for its equilibrium with the environment, it is probably one of the least “green” of all policies. Adding millions of non-native people year after year has a terrible effect on water and energy usage, waste disposal, urban sprawl, traffic congestion, etc. Silicon Valley companies may make their headquarters energy efficient, but the California created by the Democrats they donate to will be an energy nightmare. Liberals are too committed to Big Diversity to be proper stewards of the environment. Environmentalism has no future in the hands of the Left."

https://www.amren.com/commentary/2017/04/white-environmentalism-roosevelt-conservation-environment/
 
Top