We all have opinions on the "no-huddle" or muddle huddle offense and its efficacy. Can you look at some film and compare the defenses, personnel and situations that allowed the last drive to be so efficient when the team had basically just "gotten along" offensively for most of the 2nd half.
Was it a schematic failure of the Bears given the inability to substitute, or was the offense just... "sharper" in the no huddle? Need somebody who really 'understands' football.