- Joined
- Nov 2, 2014
- Messages
- 832
- Reaction score
- 1,163
- Points
- 93
When you look at the drafting history it's clear a major problem on offense is the lack of high end draft picks, which is the result of the number of missed picks (and Shazier's career ending) on Defense necessitating going back to the well for the same position multiple times. Najee Harris is the first offensive player drafted in the first round since 2012 when DeCastro was drafted. Since that draft the Steelers have had 18 1st and 2nd round picks (I'm including the picks traded for Fitzpatrick and to trade up for Bush in the pick count) of which 12 have been used on defense, and 6 on offense (and 2 of the offensive picks are in their rookie years this year). That's 66% used on 50% of the starting positions. When you break it down further you get 5 used on defensive backs and 6 on linebackers. That's 62% of first and second round picks used on 36% of starting positions (or maybe 40% if you want to factor in occasions when there's 5DB's on the field).
And it gets worse - 5 of the last 9 first rounders used on linebackers, or 56% of first rounders used on 18% of starting positions. Okay, the use of two first rounders on ILB is understandable given the loss of Shazier to injury and you can't expect to hit on every single first and second rounder, but three first rounders on OLB, 2 firsts and a 2nd on safety (and the one real success at safety they traded for) is not a great reflection on drafting.
This goes a long way to explaining why the O is struggling. Certainly coaching also plays a part in the poor performance, but maybe they would have been in a better position to draft O Line high if they hadn't had so many mediocre to poor picks on D, (and they didn't have any late rounders or UDFA's make up for it by becoming first/second round quality players). I'm pretty sure there aren't too many elite O-lines in the NFL that have two rookies starting on an oline that has no first or second round picks. Fans can say they should have prioritised Oline, but reality was each time they went linebacker/safety/cornerback there was an immediate need for starters as a result of previous picks not working out.
And it gets worse - 5 of the last 9 first rounders used on linebackers, or 56% of first rounders used on 18% of starting positions. Okay, the use of two first rounders on ILB is understandable given the loss of Shazier to injury and you can't expect to hit on every single first and second rounder, but three first rounders on OLB, 2 firsts and a 2nd on safety (and the one real success at safety they traded for) is not a great reflection on drafting.
This goes a long way to explaining why the O is struggling. Certainly coaching also plays a part in the poor performance, but maybe they would have been in a better position to draft O Line high if they hadn't had so many mediocre to poor picks on D, (and they didn't have any late rounders or UDFA's make up for it by becoming first/second round quality players). I'm pretty sure there aren't too many elite O-lines in the NFL that have two rookies starting on an oline that has no first or second round picks. Fans can say they should have prioritised Oline, but reality was each time they went linebacker/safety/cornerback there was an immediate need for starters as a result of previous picks not working out.