- Joined
- Aug 17, 2015
- Messages
- 624
- Reaction score
- 456
- Points
- 63
I still don’t understand why the first sack where TJ forced the fumble was not considered a sack. Was it because the bad snap re-classified Huntley as a runner?
I still don’t understand why the first sack where TJ forced the fumble was not considered a sack. Was it because the bad snap re-classified Huntley as a runner?
The official scorer was a dipshit. It’s as plain and simple as that. If he determines it was a running play after a bad snap then no sack. It was an obvious pass play. The dude was likely a ravens fan.I still don’t understand why the first sack where TJ forced the fumble was not considered a sack. Was it because the bad snap re-classified Huntley as a runner?
Strip sacks are a forced fumble and a sack but not a tackle. At least that’s my understandingDon’t sacks constitute tackles? If he forced a fumble, it couldn’t be a tackle (which would end the play) and therefore it’s not a sack. That what I was thinking.