- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 16,452
- Reaction score
- 14,927
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Lebanon, OH (Near Kings Island)
or posting something that totally ignores any facts. as he just did.Flog will rebutt all of this by staunchly ignoring the thread.
or posting something that totally ignores any facts. as he just did.Flog will rebutt all of this by staunchly ignoring the thread.
Or just continuing to be a ******* commie retard.or posting something that totally ignores any facts. as he just did.
Watch ALL the Sunday morning political shows on ALL the networks.I know y’all won’t watch it, but Makary just seriously **** the bed on Face the Nation!what a ******* mess of an administration.
I know y’all won’t watch it, but Makary just seriously **** the bed on Face the Nation!what a ******* mess of an administration.
I know y’all won’t watch it, but Makary just seriously **** the bed on Face the Nation!what a ******* mess of an administration.
Makary 1
MSM 0
we collectively shake our heads and laugh at your responses.Brennan literally shook her head and laughed at the end.
Strange you should get so angry.we collectively shake our heads and laugh at your responses.
She is ignorant and misunderstands that science is about demonstrating results, not pointing to pFraudulent stats and pretending they are real, like your medical associations have done.Brennan literally shook her head and laughed at the end.
No anger.....mounting disappointment of your continuing ignorance in the face of facts you do not want to consider.Strange you should get so angry.
After 890 pages, facts have little to do with this.No anger.....mounting disappointment of your continuing ignorance in the face of facts you do not want to consider.
NO! Makary suggested that there MIGHT be a basis to not recommend the vaccine for healthy children and pregnant women IF they did new trials. That’s NOT science, that’s guessing. Brennan asked when there would be new trials and he couldn’t answer. He said people should consult with the doctors he is supposed to be providing guidance and recommendations.She is ignorant and misunderstands that science is about demonstrating results, not pointing to pFraudulent stats and pretending they are real, like your medical associations have done.
Bureaucrats and bought media don't make science, real people with actual data, experience and demonstrated hypotheses do.
Perhaps soon you will understand this
not once in my response did i reply anything that would remotely suggest anger. that's a liberal thing.Strange you should get so angry.
calm down, princessNO! Makary suggested that there MIGHT be a basis to not recommend the vaccine for healthy children and pregnant women IF they did new trials. That’s NOT science, that’s guessing. Brennan asked when there would be new trials and he couldn’t answer. He said people should consult with the doctors he is supposed to be providing guidance and recommendations.
Lol.....what part of the continually moving goal posts from both pFucking pFraudulent pFizer and Murderna "safety trials" indicated safety?NO! Makary suggested that there MIGHT be a basis to not recommend the vaccine for healthy children and pregnant women IF they did new trials. That’s NOT science, that’s guessing. Brennan asked when there would be new trials and he couldn’t answer. He said people should consult with the doctors he is supposed to be providing guidance and recommendations.
As someone that does IH, I highly doubt the PEL would ever elevate to that point over the TMA.
Carbon sequestrationMy question would be walking around with it on all day and night everyday. Now most people used those stylish rags on the face,as well as wearing that same deal over and over.
I always looked at it as some horribly cross contamination germ factory.
Uh, this from the FDA…Lol.....what part of the continually moving goal posts from both pFucking pFraudulent pFizer and Murderna "safety trials" indicated safety?
Please include reference to the control group in your response.
What part of the post marketing data would any sane person point at to say: this is safe for pregnant women?
No you’re right. But there would not be harm. I still yo this day do not consider this paper mask(n95) a respirator. It is a paper mask with more layers.My question would be walking around with it on all day and night everyday. Now most people used those stylish rags on the face,as well as wearing that same deal over and over.
I always looked at it as some horribly cross contamination germ factory.
I will raise you this actual study, not funded by captured regulators at FDA: