• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Epstein Problem

ZonaBurgh said:
While this administration is light years better than the previous one, there certainly are areas that need improvement, like actually arresting the purveyors of fraud and corruption, and letting our justice system decide their fate.
Click to expand...
And yet it never happens. Never. It's almost like it is set up that way or something. Weird.
 
Kinda makes ya feel bad bad for Bob Menendez.
How did he manage to piss off everyone?
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
Ain't it just incredibly, inexplicably weird that when Bill and Hillduhry Clinton refused to appear in front of Congress over the Epstein files, Tibslodyte went eerily quiet?

I mean, I think it's odd. Utterly predictable. But odd.

No, not odd in the damned least, who I am I kidding?? :LOL: :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
The Clintons weren’t educated in West Vagina, Tim.

 
Troglodyte said:
The Clintons weren’t educated in West Vagina, Tim.

Click to expand...


You have been the whiniest fucknut, screaming and gnashing your teeth "wanting to get to the bottom" of everything Epstein related. Day after day, page after page, thread after thread.

A normal human (you're not) in that position would be angry the Clintons (the most often identified perps in this affair) are working to evade testifying.

Nope, you go and find a social media post that applauds them using their legal background and vile intent to avoid testifying.

Floggy Re: Trump: "Release the Epstein files, he's a pedophile!"

[pictures released of Clinton nude in a pool with likely underage children...]

"Bill and Hillary are avoiding testifying, I think that's pretty cunning." //Flogtard

We can always count on you being inconsistent, hypocritical, and ideological.
 
Hypocrite and obsequious bootlicker.
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
You have been the whiniest fucknut, screaming and gnashing your teeth "wanting to get to the bottom" of everything Epstein related. Day after day, page after page, thread after thread.

A normal human (you're not) in that position would be angry the Clintons (the most often identified perps in this affair) are working to evade testifying.

Nope, you go and find a social media post that applauds them using their legal background and vile intent to avoid testifying.

Floggy Re: Trump: "Release the Epstein files, he's a pedophile!"

[pictures released of Clinton nude in a pool with likely underage children...]

"Bill and Hillary are avoiding testifying, I think that's pretty cunning." //Flogtard

We can always count on you being inconsistent, hypocritical, and ideological.
Click to expand...
Go ahead and show where you were critical of TRUMPS DOJ blocking the release of the files.

 
Tim Steelersfan said:
Why bother? You can't be bothered to care about Clintons, hugely implicated in this mess. You simply don't care that they were involved. You only care about certain people being implicated.

That's crystal clear.
Click to expand...
Did you listen to what she said? Does the house oversight committee care and will they prosecute the Clintons is the relevant question. And WHY NOT?

Do you care that the DOJ blocked the release of the files? Where’s your criticism? You were for the release before you were against it.
 
Troglodyte said:
Did you listen to what she said? Does the house oversight committee care and will they prosecute the Clintons is the relevant question. And WHY NOT?

Do you care that the DOJ blocked the release of the files? Where’s your criticism? You were for the release before you were against it.
Click to expand...

Do you care about the Clintons being with underage children? You've never ever never ever uttered a word condemning their likely/potential involvement in it all. Ever. Not once. Nary a time.

So again I ask you, why are you so intent on asking US why we should care when you are clearly partisan exhibiting (as you have for 15 years) nothing but selective outrage?

Don't dare ask us to care about what you care about when you care in only one direction.

Step across the aisle, just once. Ashli. The innumerable women killed by illegal aliens. The 300K+ kids Biden lost at the border, the child trafficking as well. Charlie Kirk. You have thousands of examples where you could show a hint of a bi-partisan care.

Once. Just...once.

Until then, **** off. You're a sub-human troll.
 
Troglodyte said:
Did you listen to what she said? Does the house oversight committee care and will they prosecute the Clintons is the relevant question. And WHY NOT?

Do you care that the DOJ blocked the release of the files? Where’s your criticism? You were for the release before you were against it.
Click to expand...
why didnt Biden's DOJ release the Epstein files?
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
Do you care about the Clintons being with underage children? You've never ever never ever uttered a word condemning their likely/potential involvement in it all. Ever. Not once. Nary a time.
Click to expand...
😂 I threw out my Clinton hat, Bible, wristwatch and flag. Oh wait, that’s right, I never owned any of those things.

Are allegations really the hill you want to die on? Because you voted for a guy who allegedly sexually assaulted 28 women.
Tim Steelersfan said:
So again I ask you, why are you so intent on asking US why we should care when you are clearly partisan exhibiting (as you have for 15 years) nothing but selective outrage?
Click to expand...
Charge the Clinton’s, I don’t care but RELEASE THE DAMN FILES.
Tim Steelersfan said:
Don't dare ask us to care about what you care about when you care in only one direction.
Click to expand...
See above. You won’t say the same for Trump.
Tim Steelersfan said:
Step across the aisle, just once. Ashli. The innumerable women killed by illegal aliens. The 300K+ kids Biden lost at the border, the child trafficking as well.
Click to expand...
The paper trail was lost, not the actual children, Tim.
Tim Steelersfan said:
Charlie Kirk. You have thousands of examples where you could show a hint of a bi-partisan care.
Click to expand...
Waiting for the facts on Kirk, right?
Tim Steelersfan said:
Once. Just...once.

Until then, **** off. You're a sub-human troll.
Click to expand...
I take that as a compliment coming from you.
 
Troglodyte said:
Tim will tell you that they were protecting the victims just like the DOJ is doing now.
Click to expand...
if i wanted Tim's opinion, I'd ask him.

i guess since you cannot give your own opinion, that means you've not been told what to believe yet. other than to periodically screech to release the files. which we have all wanted released. everyone.

they have not been released due to an Obama-appointed judge upholding their release.


A federal judge on Wednesday shut down a bipartisan bid by two House members to force the Justice Department to speed up the release of Jeffrey Epstein-related records, ruling the court lacks authority to police the Justice Department’s compliance inside Ghislaine Maxwell’s “effectively closed” criminal case.

Republican Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie and Democratic California Rep. Ro Khanna asked U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer to let them weigh in as “friends of the court” and appoint a special master or monitor to oversee the DOJ’s public release of records under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which Congress passed and President Donald Trump signed in November.

“Put simply, the DOJ cannot be trusted with making mandatory disclosures under the Act,” the lawmakers wrote in a Jan. 8 letter urging Engelmayer to install an independent watchdog.

Engelmayer, an Obama appointee, ruled the bid was a nonstarter because “[t]he only parties to the case are Maxwell and the United States,” and because Maxwell was charged under six federal criminal statutes “not brought under the EFTA, which did not exist at the time and is not a criminal statute.”

Still, Engelmayer acknowledged the underlying dispute, writing that the lawmakers’ and victims’ questions “raise legitimate concerns about whether DOJ is faithfully complying with federal law.” The judge noted the decision does not bar Massie and Khanna from filing a separate lawsuit and said they remain free to use congressional oversight tools.

The law requires to the DOJ to publish, in a searchable and downloadable format, all unclassified records in its possession that relate to Epstein, Maxwell and bars withholding “on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.”

------


Paul A. Engelmayer is a U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, nominated by President Barack Obama in 2011. He has a background in law, having previously served as a federal prosecutor and a partner at a law firm.

Ballotpedia fjc.gov

Overview of Paul A. Engelmayer​

Paul A. Engelmayer is a United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York. He was nominated by President Barack Obama on February 2, 2011, and confirmed by the Senate on July 26, 2011, with a unanimous vote of 98-0.

Education and Early Career​

  • Education:
    • Bachelor of Arts from Harvard University, summa cum laude, 1983
    • Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School, magna cum laude, 1987
  • Early Career:
    • Staff reporter for The Wall Street Journal (1983-1984)
    • Law clerk for Chief Judge Patricia Wald (1987-1988) and Justice Thurgood Marshall (1988-1989)
    • Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (1989-1994, 1996-1999)

Judicial Career​

Engelmayer has presided over various significant cases, including:

  • American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Metropolitan Transit Authority: Ruled that the MTA violated the First Amendment by refusing to allow certain advertisements.
  • Conscience Rule Case: Invalidated a 2019 rule by the Department of Health and Human Services regarding conscience rights, citing violations of the Administrative Procedure Act.

Recent Developments​

In February 2025, Congressman Derrick Van Orden introduced articles of impeachment against Engelmayer, alleging judicial misconduct related to a ruling that halted a presidential executive order. The resolution claims he overstepped his authority and acted with bias.

Engelmayer continues to serve on the bench, contributing to the influential Southern District of New York, known for its jurisdiction over major financial centers.
fjc.gov Wikipedia

---------------------------------------------------------

and, just so you can get a direct line to this dude....


District Judge​


Thurgood Marshall
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Courtroom: 1305

Location:
Manhattan, New York, NY 10007
Address:
40 Foley Square New York
Telephone:
(212) 857-8500
Courthouse Hours:
8:30 am - 5:00 pm
Clerk's Office Hours:
8:30 am - 5:00 pm

ring him up, Flog! Demand those files be released!
 
Superman said:
if i wanted Tim's opinion, I'd ask him.

i guess since you cannot give your own opinion, that means you've not been told what to believe yet. other than to periodically screech to release the files. which we have all wanted released. everyone.

they have not been released due to an Obama-appointed judge upholding their release.


A federal judge on Wednesday shut down a bipartisan bid by two House members to force the Justice Department to speed up the release of Jeffrey Epstein-related records, ruling the court lacks authority to police the Justice Department’s compliance inside Ghislaine Maxwell’s “effectively closed” criminal case.

Republican Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie and Democratic California Rep. Ro Khanna asked U.S. District Judge Paul A. Engelmayer to let them weigh in as “friends of the court” and appoint a special master or monitor to oversee the DOJ’s public release of records under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which Congress passed and President Donald Trump signed in November.

“Put simply, the DOJ cannot be trusted with making mandatory disclosures under the Act,” the lawmakers wrote in a Jan. 8 letter urging Engelmayer to install an independent watchdog.

Engelmayer, an Obama appointee, ruled the bid was a nonstarter because “[t]he only parties to the case are Maxwell and the United States,” and because Maxwell was charged under six federal criminal statutes “not brought under the EFTA, which did not exist at the time and is not a criminal statute.”

Still, Engelmayer acknowledged the underlying dispute, writing that the lawmakers’ and victims’ questions “raise legitimate concerns about whether DOJ is faithfully complying with federal law.” The judge noted the decision does not bar Massie and Khanna from filing a separate lawsuit and said they remain free to use congressional oversight tools.

The law requires to the DOJ to publish, in a searchable and downloadable format, all unclassified records in its possession that relate to Epstein, Maxwell and bars withholding “on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity.”

------


Paul A. Engelmayer is a U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, nominated by President Barack Obama in 2011. He has a background in law, having previously served as a federal prosecutor and a partner at a law firm.

Ballotpedia fjc.gov

Overview of Paul A. Engelmayer​

Paul A. Engelmayer is a United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York. He was nominated by President Barack Obama on February 2, 2011, and confirmed by the Senate on July 26, 2011, with a unanimous vote of 98-0.

Education and Early Career​

  • Education:
    • Bachelor of Arts from Harvard University, summa cum laude, 1983
    • Juris Doctor from Harvard Law School, magna cum laude, 1987
  • Early Career:
    • Staff reporter for The Wall Street Journal (1983-1984)
    • Law clerk for Chief Judge Patricia Wald (1987-1988) and Justice Thurgood Marshall (1988-1989)
    • Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York (1989-1994, 1996-1999)

Judicial Career​

Engelmayer has presided over various significant cases, including:

  • American Freedom Defense Initiative v. Metropolitan Transit Authority: Ruled that the MTA violated the First Amendment by refusing to allow certain advertisements.
  • Conscience Rule Case: Invalidated a 2019 rule by the Department of Health and Human Services regarding conscience rights, citing violations of the Administrative Procedure Act.

Recent Developments​

In February 2025, Congressman Derrick Van Orden introduced articles of impeachment against Engelmayer, alleging judicial misconduct related to a ruling that halted a presidential executive order. The resolution claims he overstepped his authority and acted with bias.

Engelmayer continues to serve on the bench, contributing to the influential Southern District of New York, known for its jurisdiction over major financial centers.
fjc.gov Wikipedia

---------------------------------------------------------

and, just so you can get a direct line to this dude....


District Judge​


Thurgood Marshall
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Courtroom: 1305

Location:
Manhattan, New York, NY 10007
Address:
40 Foley Square New York
Telephone:
(212) 857-8500
Courthouse Hours:
8:30 am - 5:00 pm
Clerk's Office Hours:
8:30 am - 5:00 pm

ring him up, Flog! Demand those files be released!
Click to expand...
Read the second to last paragraph, retard.
 
Troglodyte said:
Read the second to last paragraph, retard.
Click to expand...
but this judge has the power to release them as is. and the politicians attempting to get this done are ... R and D.

https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-paul-engelmayer

District Judge​


Thurgood Marshall
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Courtroom: 1305

Location:
Manhattan, New York, NY 10007
Address:
40 Foley Square New York
Telephone:
(212) 857-8500
Courthouse Hours:
8:30 am - 5:00 pm
Clerk's Office Hours:
8:30 am - 5:00 pm

ring him up, Flog! Demand those files be released!
 
Troglodyte said:
😂 I threw out my Clinton hat, Bible, wristwatch and flag. Oh wait, that’s right, I never owned any of those things.

Are allegations really the hill you want to die on? Because you voted for a guy who allegedly sexually assaulted 28 women.

Charge the Clinton’s, I don’t care but RELEASE THE DAMN FILES.

See above. You won’t say the same for Trump.

The paper trail was lost, not the actual children, Tim.

Waiting for the facts on Kirk, right?

I take that as a compliment coming from you.
Click to expand...

I - and countless others here have said release the files. Over and over.

I - and countless others here have said indict/charge anyone/everyone involved. Over and over.

Now, only after being badgered for months and painted into a corner, you finally say "Charge the Clintons, I don't care."

I'm glad I finally got you to say it.

Tim 93, Flog 0.
 
Superman said:
but this judge has the power to release them as is. and the politicians attempting to get this done are ... R and D.

https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-paul-engelmayer

District Judge​


Thurgood Marshall
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Courtroom: 1305

Location:
Manhattan, New York, NY 10007
Address:
40 Foley Square New York
Telephone:
(212) 857-8500
Courthouse Hours:
8:30 am - 5:00 pm
Clerk's Office Hours:
8:30 am - 5:00 pm

ring him up, Flog! Demand those files be released!
Click to expand...
Read the third to last paragraph, retard.

A Khana and Massie are trying to get the files released as was promised under the EFTA and you take the DOJs side and blame a judge. They shouldn’t have had to seek the courts help in the first place.

Why are you supporting the DOJ?
 
Tim Steelersfan said:
I - and countless others here have said release the files. Over and over.

I - and countless others here have said indict/charge anyone/everyone involved. Over and over.

Now, only after being badgered for months and painted into a corner, you finally say "Charge the Clintons, I don't care."

I'm glad I finally got you to say it.

Tim 93, Flog 0.
Click to expand...
No, I’ve mocked the idea of being a Clinton cultists several times. All you got is whataboutism. No criticism of the DOJ two months after being promised the release of the files. WHY?
 
Troglodyte said:
Read the third to last paragraph, retard.

A Khana and Massie are trying to get the files released as was promised under the EFTA and you take the DOJs side and blame a judge. They shouldn’t have had to seek the courts help in the first place.
Click to expand...

Troglodyte said:
Why are you supporting the DOJ?
Click to expand...

Your ignorance on this matter overwhelming.
It’s not as simple as just releasing the files. I don’t care what was promised because releasing on the date promised is unachievabe.
There are 5 million of them.

Private non DOJ attorneys representing the victims are highly adamant about protecting their victims through redactions and thus are involved.

Collectively, these private attorneys represent the vast majority of the over 1,200 identified victims and their families currently involved in the ongoing review of over 5.2 million DOJ documents.
  • Bradley Edwards & Brittany Henderson (Edwards Henderson): Represent more than 200 survivors. They have been particularly active in advocating for victim redactions in the millions of DOJ files currently being released.
  • Merson Law (Jennifer Plotkin): Represents nearly three dozen survivors.
  • Lisa Bloom: Has represented 11 survivors.
  • David Boies: Represented numerous victims in high-profile civil litigation, including lawsuits against major financial institutions like JPMorgan.
  • Spencer Kuvin: Represented dozens of survivors and frequently provides testimony regarding the legal rights of victims.
  • James Marsh & Jennifer Freeman: Represent multiple survivors, including Maria Farmer, and have filed lawsuits against the federal government for failing to protect victims.
  • Gloria Allred: Has represented dozens of victims and has been vocal about the potential risks to survivors if their identities are revealed in document releases.
  • Professor Paul Cassell: Represented victims in challenging the 2008 non-prosecution agreement before the U.S. Supreme Court.

And to further get you up to speed…125000 pages have been released with Trumps name appearing 1500 times.
Unfortunately for the TDS afflicted thats 1500 nothing burgers.
That story sounds familiar.
 
Troglodyte said:
No, I’ve mocked the idea of being a Clinton cultists several times. All you got is whataboutism. No criticism of the DOJ two months after being promised the release of the files. WHY?
Click to expand...

No, you've intentionally, selectively refused to address this issue in a bi-partisan way EVER by demanding justice across the board for all involved. You have only ever focused on Trump. Period. End of story.

Thank you for letting me lead you to the middle, finally.

Now let's get you to admit Ashli Babbitt's and Renee Good's stories are equal.
 
Troglodyte said:
Read the third to last paragraph, retard.

A Khana and Massie are trying to get the files released as was promised under the EFTA and you take the DOJs side and blame a judge. They shouldn’t have had to seek the courts help in the first place.

Why are you supporting the DOJ?
Click to expand...
I've given you the information to contact the judge.
why are you not doing so?
are you scared of your government?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top