- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 37,163
- Reaction score
- 43,098
- Points
- 113
- Location
- between $2 short & ten buck two
I’m sure most of you have heard that it actually cost Seahawks QB to play in and win the Super Bowl.
Just going off memory, but the winners each get $178.000.
California has a “Jock-Tax” that takes into consideration their annual salary and bases the income tax off salary / game pay while in state / # of days working in state. (I think they used 5 for the Super Bowl)
The grand total was near $248,000 dollars tax. So Sam Darnold paid in close to $72,000 more than he won in the SB.
Some are saying the NFLPA is going to tell the NFL, no more SBs in California. It’s insane what California has come to.
It’s the off-season, what mean I say ???
Salute the nation
Just going off memory, but the winners each get $178.000.
California has a “Jock-Tax” that takes into consideration their annual salary and bases the income tax off salary / game pay while in state / # of days working in state. (I think they used 5 for the Super Bowl)
The grand total was near $248,000 dollars tax. So Sam Darnold paid in close to $72,000 more than he won in the SB.
Some are saying the NFLPA is going to tell the NFL, no more SBs in California. It’s insane what California has come to.
It’s the off-season, what mean I say ???
Salute the nation