• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

The Epstein Problem

nah. of course they're not.

 
Troglodyte said:
Click to expand...


giphy.gif



Richard Kahn's Testimony​

The latest scrutiny began on 11 March, when Epstein's longtime accountant, Richard Kahn, sat for a closed-door deposition with the House Oversight Committee.

Kahn, who also served as a co-executor of Epstein's estate, was questioned directly about whether 'Jane Doe 4' had received money through the estate's victim compensation process.

At first, Kahn appeared to confirm that a settlement had been paid. But as the session continued, and after consulting with his attorney, that answer changed. His legal team then said they did not recognise the specific 'Jane Doe 4' being referenced.

Within a day, the explanation shifted again—first to say her claim had been denied, then later to say they could neither confirm nor deny whether any payment was made at all.

Lawmakers described the sequence as a string of reversals that changed multiple times in less than 48 hours. Representatives, including Ro Khanna and Robert Garcia, formally demanded written clarification, calling the testimony inconsistent.

Pushback and Competing Explanations​

Republicans and individuals familiar with the deposition have pushed back on the criticism, arguing the confusion may stem from mixing up different individuals who used the same pseudonym.

House Oversight Chair James Comer has suggested that the 'Jane Doe 4' referenced in questioning may not be the same person tied to allegations involving Trump.

Kahn also testified that he had never seen any financial transaction connected to Trump or his family in the estate's records, a point his defenders say has been overlooked in the fallout.
giphy.gif
 
 
 
Confluence said:
And describe crimes attached to those names, and her experience.

Instead she focuses on Bondi. Why not Garlick Merrand too?
Click to expand...
I'm sure what happened to these people was terrible, but they just seem to like the attention now. All they have to do is give names and accounts of what happened instead of the constant innuendos / threats
 
Something certainly is off here, nothing but vague accusations causing me to lose interest that anything will come of this.

Just like the uncovering of taxpayer fraud, our two-tiered justice system is on full display.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top