was aint be not repot no wharz
something else Tibs missed, but dismisses as irrelevant.
Tibs will also cast his vote for those who are influenced by and keep Piker in their close circle of trust, but publicly state he disagrees with the premise that Piker stands for.Tibs will say he emphatically opposes the views that Piker expresses, while calling everyone here Trump cultists for thinking it should be an issue of concern.
Bernie Bros stick with their masterTibs will also cast his vote for those who are influenced by and keep Piker in their close circle of trust, but publicly state he disagrees with the premise that Piker stands for.
Commie Cunts, if you will.Bernie Bros stick with their master
The issue wasn't him having sex with 17 year old when he was 18. He shared a sex video of the 17 year old online - that is where the sexual exploitation of a child charges come from.https://www.abc15.com/us-news/crime...h-sexual-exploitation-of-a-child-deputies-say
Technically this maybe correct, but the two teenagers involved in this were 11 months apart in age, making the claim of exploiting a child politically biased at best.
Other than the milk toast liberal males, a lot of us could be accused of this in high school.
No question it was a dumb (18 year old) decision to post online, just the media's deceptive headline that the 17 year old was a child.The issue wasn't him having sex with 17 year old when he was 18. He shared a sex video of the 17 year old online - that is where the sexual exploitation of a child charges come from.