- Joined
- Aug 9, 2014
- Messages
- 1,717
- Reaction score
- 2,162
- Points
- 113
Calling them liberals is the polite way to describe them.Liberals say it's ok to kill kids now.
Calling them liberals is the polite way to describe them.Liberals say it's ok to kill kids now.
I’m not sure, but being one of the libtard strongholds in this country, I think the chances of one out of twelve being sane are much stronger than eleven of twelve having basic common sense and morality.Was it 11-1 in favor of acquittal? Does the court allow releasing such information?
What say the legal counselors here?
Not all heroes wear capes.
LOLOLOLOLOLOL
Jury is deadlocked. They will either have to have a new trial and we go through all this again or the judge can render a verdict.
I think.
SN legal counsel needs to weigh in.
Was it 11-1 in favor of acquittal? Does the court allow releasing such information?
What say the legal counselors here?
Oj And Ho-J ....Heard that Lindsay will now be teaming up with OJ to find Nicole's killer as well as the 3 kids.
Too soon?
I'm pretty sure it was 11-1 not guilty. Why else would the defense throw a fit. If that one person was in favor of his client he would want that person to hold their ground and get a mis trial. The defense attorney should face charges though. First he stated "he" which narrows the possible people down to 3. It won't be hard to figure out who the holdout was.
The insanity defense is just stupid. If you can strangle your kids obviously you are not mentally right. Any one who can murder your kids / family etc etc is not mentally stable. If Lindsay was a guy I bet he would been found guilty immediately.
The extreme fringe of the left wing lunatic group supports after birth terminations , usually to one or two but some into 3 or even 5... its rare.. or well it used to be... they were always my polar opposites to conservatives who think masturbation is murder ... two sides of tge same coinMen Shocked That Devoted Members of Death Cult
Support Murdering Children
![]()
"Murdering children is perfectly fine!!"
One man interviewed on the street summed up the shock of many by observing, "We had no idea. If only we had some warning signs." When reminded of late-term abortion, the man replied, "Well, yeah, Lindsay was free to murder the 8-month old, no problem there, but after they are potty trained? Hands off!"
The extreme fringe of the left wing lunatic group supports after birth terminations , usually to one or two but some into 3 or even 5... its rare.. or well it used to be... they were always my polar opposites to conservatives who think masturbation is murder ... two sides of tge same coin
That's why SN pays you the big money.Nope. Clancy demanded a jury trial. Right to a jury trial is absolute.
I wasnt speaking of late term abortions... i meant the ones who argue on messageboards snd elsewhere that after birth... like months or years later.. until the child is developed enough to be a functioning, partially independent person.. terminating them for reasons like financial or mental health should be ok..,Your claim is pure, utter, unadulterated and absolute bullshit.
First, the number of liberals who believe that "late-term abortions," i.e., killing viable humans, should be allowed is not 1% or 3% or 5%. 25% of (D)imbos support late-term abortions.
(D)imbos love killing little kids
That is among all (D)imbos. The support among self-identified liberals is of course much higher.
Second, no person in the United States - literally none - has advocated laws banning masturbation. Your analogy is inane. Compare your fictional population with this reality:
![]()
Mass. (murder) Governor Signs Law Protecting
"Late Term" Abortions (i.e., killing of people)
As usual, liberal analogies are idiotic.
And there are still a couple of extreme Christian or jewish sects that adhere to the early theologians and traditions (such as specific interpretations within historical Catholic teaching) that classified any sexual act outside of procreation as a grave moral wrong. In older, fringe medical or theological theories, some incorrectly believed a single sperm cell contained a fully formed human life, making waste equivalent to ending a life.Your claim is pure, utter, unadulterated and absolute bullshit.
First, the number of liberals who believe that "late-term abortions," i.e., killing viable humans, should be allowed is not 1% or 3% or 5%. 25% of (D)imbos support late-term abortions.
(D)imbos love killing little kids
That is among all (D)imbos. The support among self-identified liberals is of course much higher.
Second, no person in the United States - literally none - has advocated laws banning masturbation. Your analogy is inane. Compare your fictional population with this reality:
![]()
Mass. (murder) Governor Signs Law Protecting
"Late Term" Abortions (i.e., killing of people)
As usual, liberal analogies are idiotic.
nope 11 - 1 the other way, there was one hero.Clancy's lawyer is a moron. It's looking pretty obvious now that it's 11-1 with one person not budging. It HAS to be 11 guilty. Her lawyer tried to get the 1 holdout thrown off the jury as that deluded idiot thinks it's 11 not guilty's. He's trying to get the 1 juror that's keeping them in the game thrown out, lol.