• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Liberalism is a mental illness thread

Was it 11-1 in favor of acquittal? Does the court allow releasing such information?
What say the legal counselors here?
I’m not sure, but being one of the libtard strongholds in this country, I think the chances of one out of twelve being sane are much stronger than eleven of twelve having basic common sense and morality.
 
I'm pretty sure it was 11-1 not guilty. Why else would the defense throw a fit. If that one person was in favor of his client he would want that person to hold their ground and get a mis trial. The defense attorney should face charges though. First he stated "he" which narrows the possible people down to 3. It won't be hard to figure out who the holdout was.
The insanity defense is just stupid. If you can strangle your kids obviously you are not mentally right. Any one who can murder your kids / family etc etc is not mentally stable. If Lindsay was a guy I bet he would been found guilty immediately.
 
And pictures of jurors taken. Cameras in the courtroom showed the jurors multiple times. Putting those people at risk should get jail time.
 
Men Shocked That Devoted Members of Death Cult
Support Murdering Children


images

"Murdering children is perfectly fine!!"

One man interviewed on the street summed up the shock of many by observing, "We had no idea. If only we had some warning signs." When reminded of late-term abortion, the man replied, "Well, yeah, Lindsay was free to murder the 8-month old, no problem there, but after they are potty trained? Hands off!"
 
LOLOLOLOLOLOL



In a related story, gay men in Sag Harbor, NY report that cheap blowjobs are now readily available. Dr. Flogstain, ded dog dragging walking champion and unpaid reporter, with more on the story ...
 
Jury is deadlocked. They will either have to have a new trial and we go through all this again or the judge can render a verdict.
I think.
SN legal counsel needs to weigh in.

Nope. Clancy demanded a jury trial. Right to a jury trial is absolute.
 
Was it 11-1 in favor of acquittal? Does the court allow releasing such information?
What say the legal counselors here?

Yes. Before releasing the jury, the judge asks counsel if they wish to poll the jury, i.e., ask them if they have reached a verdict. They do so just to make sure the jury is in fact deadlocked. If all 12 state in open court they have reached a verdict, then we know it's a screw-up on the claim the jury is deadlocked.

I have a good friend who tried a civil case and was told the jury had rendered a verdict against his client. He asked to poll the jury and turns out it was 8-4 in his client's favor where California civil verdicts require at least 9 jurors voting one way. Attorneys met with judge, agreed the jury was simply screwed up and judge told them that was not a defense verdict.

The deliberated for another hour and came back 10-2 for the plaintiff. Juries do weird **** sometimes.
 
I'm pretty sure it was 11-1 not guilty. Why else would the defense throw a fit. If that one person was in favor of his client he would want that person to hold their ground and get a mis trial. The defense attorney should face charges though. First he stated "he" which narrows the possible people down to 3. It won't be hard to figure out who the holdout was.
The insanity defense is just stupid. If you can strangle your kids obviously you are not mentally right. Any one who can murder your kids / family etc etc is not mentally stable. If Lindsay was a guy I bet he would been found guilty immediately.


First off its very weird the lawyer knew as much as he did... most of what he did may have just been theatrics for the next trial.. making it sound as if she was somehow wronged and deserves sympathy..

The insanity defense should be neutered in this country... barring someone mind controlling you that can be proven, consequences for your actions shouldnt be dismissed.. a drunk driver kills someone, they are liable despite being out ofvtgeir mind..

Doesnt mean you shouldnt get help... but the idea that you can not serve time for what you did is ludicrous...
 
Men Shocked That Devoted Members of Death Cult
Support Murdering Children


images

"Murdering children is perfectly fine!!"

One man interviewed on the street summed up the shock of many by observing, "We had no idea. If only we had some warning signs." When reminded of late-term abortion, the man replied, "Well, yeah, Lindsay was free to murder the 8-month old, no problem there, but after they are potty trained? Hands off!"
The extreme fringe of the left wing lunatic group supports after birth terminations , usually to one or two but some into 3 or even 5... its rare.. or well it used to be... they were always my polar opposites to conservatives who think masturbation is murder ... two sides of tge same coin
 
The extreme fringe of the left wing lunatic group supports after birth terminations , usually to one or two but some into 3 or even 5... its rare.. or well it used to be... they were always my polar opposites to conservatives who think masturbation is murder ... two sides of tge same coin

Your claim is pure, utter, unadulterated and absolute bullshit.

First, the number of liberals who believe that "late-term abortions," i.e., killing viable humans, should be allowed is not 1% or 3% or 5%. 25% of (D)imbos support late-term abortions.

(D)imbos love killing little kids

That is among all (D)imbos. The support among self-identified liberals is of course much higher.

Second, no person in the United States - literally none - has advocated laws banning masturbation. Your analogy is inane. Compare your fictional population with this reality:

NZFXBX43FFCRLFUQBH56V2X6DU.jpeg

Mass. (murder) Governor Signs Law Protecting
"Late Term" Abortions (i.e., killing of people)


As usual, liberal analogies are idiotic.
 
Your claim is pure, utter, unadulterated and absolute bullshit.

First, the number of liberals who believe that "late-term abortions," i.e., killing viable humans, should be allowed is not 1% or 3% or 5%. 25% of (D)imbos support late-term abortions.

(D)imbos love killing little kids

That is among all (D)imbos. The support among self-identified liberals is of course much higher.

Second, no person in the United States - literally none - has advocated laws banning masturbation. Your analogy is inane. Compare your fictional population with this reality:

NZFXBX43FFCRLFUQBH56V2X6DU.jpeg

Mass. (murder) Governor Signs Law Protecting
"Late Term" Abortions (i.e., killing of people)


As usual, liberal analogies are idiotic.
I wasnt speaking of late term abortions... i meant the ones who argue on messageboards snd elsewhere that after birth... like months or years later.. until the child is developed enough to be a functioning, partially independent person.. terminating them for reasons like financial or mental health should be ok..,

Its extra super sick stuff... its partial birth abortion on steroids... go hunt some down on left wing crazy sites... even most abortion advocates shun them, but they are out there, and this kind of case probably brought them out in droves...
 
Your claim is pure, utter, unadulterated and absolute bullshit.

First, the number of liberals who believe that "late-term abortions," i.e., killing viable humans, should be allowed is not 1% or 3% or 5%. 25% of (D)imbos support late-term abortions.

(D)imbos love killing little kids

That is among all (D)imbos. The support among self-identified liberals is of course much higher.

Second, no person in the United States - literally none - has advocated laws banning masturbation. Your analogy is inane. Compare your fictional population with this reality:

NZFXBX43FFCRLFUQBH56V2X6DU.jpeg

Mass. (murder) Governor Signs Law Protecting
"Late Term" Abortions (i.e., killing of people)


As usual, liberal analogies are idiotic.
And there are still a couple of extreme Christian or jewish sects that adhere to the early theologians and traditions (such as specific interpretations within historical Catholic teaching) that classified any sexual act outside of procreation as a grave moral wrong. In older, fringe medical or theological theories, some incorrectly believed a single sperm cell contained a fully formed human life, making waste equivalent to ending a life.

There was a country music singer who was married to a guy in one of those religions... no sex or masturbation allowed unless trying to have a child...

You can find them online too.. usually in those forums where they are arguing that any translation of the bible outside of KJV is a sin...


I think you just havent been down enough crazy lunatic rabbitholes.. which is admirable, I guess...
the local Libs and Con extremists on this site are vanilla as **** in comparison...
 
I saw an article / meme where Lindsay's go fund me reached over 1 million dollars. Supposedly it was for her parents / travel expenses to attend the trial. On they other side of the meme was a mother of 6 who saved her kids from a raging house fire. She had burns on 93% of her body and had to go back in 3x. Her go find me got 42k. The meme did leave out that a local church had a fund raiser to help rebuild the house, but it didn't say how much
 
Clancy's lawyer is a moron. It's looking pretty obvious now that it's 11-1 with one person not budging. It HAS to be 11 guilty. Her lawyer tried to get the 1 holdout thrown off the jury as that deluded idiot thinks it's 11 not guilty's. He's trying to get the 1 juror that's keeping them in the game thrown out, lol.
nope 11 - 1 the other way, there was one hero.
 
Top