I think what the real message of the occupy movement was, in a nutshell, that you are never gonna have a healthy middle class when 80% of the country's wealth is owned by only 20% of the population.
This line of thinking irritates me more than I can adequately explain. The simple and undeniable truth of the matter is that a nation that allows its citizens to improve their lot, and advance, and earn a very good living, and one that rewards hard work and talent rather than political chicanery and gamesmanship, will succeed.
Your point that "x" percent of the people own "y" percent of the wealth fundamentally ignores the crucial fact that of the 400 wealthiest Americans,
273 earned their way onto the list with their own efforts. They did not "inherit" the wealth - they made it.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/erincar...e-forbes-400-billionaires-earned-their-money/
Nations which have suffered revolution for economic reasons - France in the 18th century, Russia in the 20th century, China in the 20th century - universally featured societies where the population had its economic future determined at birth. If you were born a Russian peasant farmer, you were never going to be a wealthy businessman.
In the United States, on the other hand, a substantial percentage of millionaires came from nothing, or next to nothing. Amazing how liberal politicians bemoan how unfair our society is, while some of their heroes - Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, Joe Biden - came from nothing to become multi-millionaires.
The middle class needs jobs that pay more than 12 bucks an hour to survive. And that's all that's really out there for them... and even that is hard to find in a lot of places in this country.
The median income has fallen under the Great O's policies. His policies failed.
Compare that to the Reagan recovery:
So here is my first proposal ... if you want to improve the status of middle class America, stop pursuing policies that have been PROVEN to fail, and instead follow policies that WORK.