- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 6,111
- Reaction score
- 14,112
- Points
- 113
What country do you consider great?
The Official Thread Dedicated to "Trump Winning"
- Thread starter Tim Steelersfan
- Start date
Im fine with that decision... id cancel every parade in this country if I could... its a waste of time and money and adds aggravation to people trying to traverse a city for a tradition thats decades past its usefulness...
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
I am disappointed that the parade was postponed. It was really bothering the lefties.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,673
- Reaction score
- 6,313
- Points
- 113
Not just the lefties Charles, not just the lefties.
Besides the enormous cost which ballooned to nearly $100M, or the fact the tanks and other vehicles would have torn up the asphalt, the biggest issue with this parade was its sole purpose would have been to soothe the damaged ego of a fragile, unhinged president. Good move by the military to shut it down. Trump will need to go back to the drawing board for newer distractions/playthings/shiny objects to bemuse himself with.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
Yeah... I'm pretty sure it was primarily bugging the **** out of the lefties.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Made them blink
China Buckles, Sends Trade Delegation to Washington to Seek End of Trade War
China and the U.S. are set to resume trade talks for the first time since June. A meeting between the two countries, which would be between lower-level officials than earlier talks, would mark a breach in the standoff that has arisen since talks broke down in the spring. U.S. officials have repeatedly said they were open to new talks but insisted that China had walked away rather than offer serious reform.
It still is not clear if China’s delegation will carry with it a reform offer serious enough to stave off the Trump administration’s threat of former tariffs. The U.S. side will be lead by Under Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs David Malpass.
The delegation led by a deputy commerce minister will visit in late August to discuss “issues of mutual concern,” the Commerce Ministry announced Thursday. It gave no details of a possible agenda.
The two governments are poised to impose a new round of tariff hikes on $16 billion of each other’s goods next week in their worsening conflict over Beijing’s technology policy.
https://www.breitbart.com/economics/2018/08/16/chinasendstradedelegation/
China Buckles, Sends Trade Delegation to Washington to Seek End of Trade War
China and the U.S. are set to resume trade talks for the first time since June. A meeting between the two countries, which would be between lower-level officials than earlier talks, would mark a breach in the standoff that has arisen since talks broke down in the spring. U.S. officials have repeatedly said they were open to new talks but insisted that China had walked away rather than offer serious reform.
It still is not clear if China’s delegation will carry with it a reform offer serious enough to stave off the Trump administration’s threat of former tariffs. The U.S. side will be lead by Under Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs David Malpass.
The delegation led by a deputy commerce minister will visit in late August to discuss “issues of mutual concern,” the Commerce Ministry announced Thursday. It gave no details of a possible agenda.
The two governments are poised to impose a new round of tariff hikes on $16 billion of each other’s goods next week in their worsening conflict over Beijing’s technology policy.
https://www.breitbart.com/economics/2018/08/16/chinasendstradedelegation/
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,673
- Reaction score
- 6,313
- Points
- 113
True dat...
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If Trump wants a big parade in his honor all he has to do is resign</p>— Frank Lesser (@sadmonsters) <a href="https://twitter.com/sadmonsters/status/1030305708422688768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 17, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">If Trump wants a big parade in his honor all he has to do is resign</p>— Frank Lesser (@sadmonsters) <a href="https://twitter.com/sadmonsters/status/1030305708422688768?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 17, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
If Trump resigned, Joy Behar would void her bowels.
I would suggest she not hold her breath.
<iframe scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets/widget_iframe.1025be460f33762a866ea882e1687ff4.html?origin=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.steelernationforums.com&settingsEndpoint=https%3A%2F%2Fsyndication.twitter.com%2Fsettings&widgetOrigin=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.steelernationforums.com%2Fshowthread.php%3F13104-The-Official-Thread-Dedicated-to-quot-Trump-Winning-quot%2Fpage86" title="Twitter settings iframe" style="display: none;"></iframe><iframe id="rufous-sandbox" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen="true" style="position: absolute; visibility: hidden; display: none; width: 0px; height: 0px; padding: 0px; border: none;" title="Twitter analytics iframe"></iframe>
Drain the swamp! Bring these lying ******** to justice!
Brennan gets bitchslapped by Benghazi hero.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...before-us.html
Kris “Tanto” Paronto, a former Army Ranger and private security contractor who was part of the CIA team that fought back during the 2012 Benghazi terror attack, accused Brennan of putting his “politics” before those in the field.
“He is lucky the security clearance is all he is getting away with,” Paronto told Fox News in an interview on Friday.
Responding a day earlier to Brennan’s tweet that his “principles are worth far more than clearances,” Paronto also tweeted:
“My principles are greater than clearances too John, especially when you and the @CIA kool-aid drinkers punishes us for not going along with the Benghazi cover-up story in order to protect you, @HillaryClinton’s & @BarackObama’s failures. You put your politics before us.”
Paronto helped write the book "13 Hours," later turned into a feature film, about the Benghazi attack. He has said he and his team lost their security clearances for speaking out.
Security operators including Paronto previously had to sign non-disclosure agreements -- Paronto told Fox News he signed three pertaining to Benghazi within a six-month period -- though Brennan told lawmakers in 2014 this was not a specific effort to prevent them from speaking to Congress.
Paronto maintains, however, that he didn't share classified information in telling the Benghazi story and continues to object to their clearances being revoked.
“Normally when you have a clearance suspended, you’re supposed to know why ... I was never given that,” he said, blaming Brennan. “It was his determination whether we kept our clearances or not.”
He also took exception at how the Benghazi team was treated upon their return.
“We come back from being on the ground to be treated as a second class citizen. You come back and you’re called a liar,” Paronto told Fox News. “Brennan came in and there was no talk of ‘hey, good job guys,’ not that you look for it, but instead, it was ‘don’t say anything guys, we don’t want the truth to get out.’”
Paronto continued his attack against Brennan on Twitter Thursday night, firing a round of accusations against the former CIA director.
..Or caught lying to congress OR caught spying on Pres. candidates OR caught using their positions to influence US elections OR caught fabricating stories about attacks on US personnel in Libya OR providing weapons to ISIS backed militias in Syria ..should I go on @JohnBrennan ? https://t.co/Vk6ui6SmR7
— Kris Paronto (@KrisParonto) August 17, 2018
Brennan gets bitchslapped by Benghazi hero.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...before-us.html
Kris “Tanto” Paronto, a former Army Ranger and private security contractor who was part of the CIA team that fought back during the 2012 Benghazi terror attack, accused Brennan of putting his “politics” before those in the field.
“He is lucky the security clearance is all he is getting away with,” Paronto told Fox News in an interview on Friday.
Responding a day earlier to Brennan’s tweet that his “principles are worth far more than clearances,” Paronto also tweeted:
“My principles are greater than clearances too John, especially when you and the @CIA kool-aid drinkers punishes us for not going along with the Benghazi cover-up story in order to protect you, @HillaryClinton’s & @BarackObama’s failures. You put your politics before us.”
Paronto helped write the book "13 Hours," later turned into a feature film, about the Benghazi attack. He has said he and his team lost their security clearances for speaking out.
Security operators including Paronto previously had to sign non-disclosure agreements -- Paronto told Fox News he signed three pertaining to Benghazi within a six-month period -- though Brennan told lawmakers in 2014 this was not a specific effort to prevent them from speaking to Congress.
Paronto maintains, however, that he didn't share classified information in telling the Benghazi story and continues to object to their clearances being revoked.
“Normally when you have a clearance suspended, you’re supposed to know why ... I was never given that,” he said, blaming Brennan. “It was his determination whether we kept our clearances or not.”
He also took exception at how the Benghazi team was treated upon their return.
“We come back from being on the ground to be treated as a second class citizen. You come back and you’re called a liar,” Paronto told Fox News. “Brennan came in and there was no talk of ‘hey, good job guys,’ not that you look for it, but instead, it was ‘don’t say anything guys, we don’t want the truth to get out.’”
Paronto continued his attack against Brennan on Twitter Thursday night, firing a round of accusations against the former CIA director.
..Or caught lying to congress OR caught spying on Pres. candidates OR caught using their positions to influence US elections OR caught fabricating stories about attacks on US personnel in Libya OR providing weapons to ISIS backed militias in Syria ..should I go on @JohnBrennan ? https://t.co/Vk6ui6SmR7
— Kris Paronto (@KrisParonto) August 17, 2018
Then all of the celebrity libs would have to move back from Canada.....oh,...wait...forget it.
It cracks me up that conservatives get pissed when the government spends money on just about anything, except the military of course, but seem to have no problem with them dropping $100 mil on a ******* parade that nobody wants except our jag off president? So much for having convictions I guess, huh?
I believe it is a waste of money. If we had a revenue surplus, it would be a different story.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Losing blacks AND women?
Dems are toast
CBS Poll Reveals Women Reject Abortion, Feminism, the Media
The majority of young millennial women reject unrestricted abortion, refuse a “feminist” identity, and indicate trust issues with the media – according to a poll by the media.
In anticipation of the upcoming midterm elections, CBS and Refinery29 teamed up for a poll concerning young American women’s voting trends and views on certain issues. They began publicizing it August 13. While some media reports of the findings focused more on the political aspects, such as the Trump Administration, the poll revealed much more. Namely, that many young women don’t fit the mold that the media and politicians often assume.
Abortion
The poll, conducted by YouGov, looked at women from the ages of 18 to 35 and found that only 28% want abortion “legal in all cases.” Other results included: 34% want abortion “legal in most cases,” 25% want abortion “illegal in most cases,” and 13% want abortion “illegal in all cases.”
In the end, that means 72% are likely in favor of some kind of abortion restriction.
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/c...-reveals-women-reject-abortion-feminism-media
Dems are toast
CBS Poll Reveals Women Reject Abortion, Feminism, the Media
The majority of young millennial women reject unrestricted abortion, refuse a “feminist” identity, and indicate trust issues with the media – according to a poll by the media.
In anticipation of the upcoming midterm elections, CBS and Refinery29 teamed up for a poll concerning young American women’s voting trends and views on certain issues. They began publicizing it August 13. While some media reports of the findings focused more on the political aspects, such as the Trump Administration, the poll revealed much more. Namely, that many young women don’t fit the mold that the media and politicians often assume.
Abortion
The poll, conducted by YouGov, looked at women from the ages of 18 to 35 and found that only 28% want abortion “legal in all cases.” Other results included: 34% want abortion “legal in most cases,” 25% want abortion “illegal in most cases,” and 13% want abortion “illegal in all cases.”
In the end, that means 72% are likely in favor of some kind of abortion restriction.
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/c...-reveals-women-reject-abortion-feminism-media
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 5,840
- Reaction score
- 4,788
- Points
- 113
Isn't that the true. Liberals everywhere would throw a party if Trump resigned. Too bad they can't just win an election instead.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
It is incredibly instructive to see how the left reacts when an anti-socialist declares. Hey ********! We do not agree, and we have a president who will not play the game!
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 6,111
- Reaction score
- 14,112
- Points
- 113
How the hell are they supposed to win an election when the damn Russians hack the voting machines and made everyone vote for Trump?
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
The narrative that Putin prefers Trump to a democrat still amuses me.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 13,673
- Reaction score
- 6,313
- Points
- 113
Sounds like someone needs a gentle reminder of what we're dealing with here.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Read the full transcript and watch the complete footage of the joint Trump-Putin news conference in Helsinki, July 16, 2018. Trump sides with Putin over U.S. intel. <a href="https://t.co/rpWcnO0mmd">https://t.co/rpWcnO0mmd</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/TrumpPutin?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#TrumpPutin</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/HelsinkiSummit2018?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#HelsinkiSummit2018</a></p>— LibertyBansTrump (@YesWeCan4Us) <a href="https://twitter.com/YesWeCan4Us/status/1030944917374357505?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 18, 2018</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Right. Hildatwat sold him uranium for his nukes. Of course he wanted her to win. A blind invalid could even see that.
Just imagine if Hillary, or better yet, Bernie had won. It would be a utopia, no one would have to work and everything would be free.
Damn you, Trump
Damn you, Trump
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
or they could just all leave
‘New Yorker’ Writer Self-Deporting Due to Trump’s Immigration Enforcement
A British writer for the New Yorker — who became a naturalized American citizen — announced that she plans to self-deport due to President Trump’s enforcement of federal immigration law.
Rebecca Mead, a newly naturalized citizen in the U.S., wrote in the New Yorker that Trump’s enforcement of immigration has been influential in her decision to move back to her native England after arriving in New York about 30 years ago.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-journ...orting-due-to-trumps-immigration-enforcement/
---------------------
'member how all those libs were gonna leave if Trump was elected? 'member?
The Liars List:
Jon Stewart
Chelsea Handler
Neve Campbell
Barry Diller
Lena Dunham
Keegan-Michael Key
Chloë Sevign
Al Sharpton
Natasha Lyonne
Eddie Griffin
Spike Lee
Samuel L. Jackson
Cher
George Lopez
Barbra Streisand
Raven-Symoné
Whoopi Goldberg
Miley Cyrus
Amy Schumer
Alec Baldwin
‘New Yorker’ Writer Self-Deporting Due to Trump’s Immigration Enforcement
A British writer for the New Yorker — who became a naturalized American citizen — announced that she plans to self-deport due to President Trump’s enforcement of federal immigration law.
Rebecca Mead, a newly naturalized citizen in the U.S., wrote in the New Yorker that Trump’s enforcement of immigration has been influential in her decision to move back to her native England after arriving in New York about 30 years ago.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-journ...orting-due-to-trumps-immigration-enforcement/
---------------------
'member how all those libs were gonna leave if Trump was elected? 'member?
The Liars List:
Jon Stewart
Chelsea Handler
Neve Campbell
Barry Diller
Lena Dunham
Keegan-Michael Key
Chloë Sevign
Al Sharpton
Natasha Lyonne
Eddie Griffin
Spike Lee
Samuel L. Jackson
Cher
George Lopez
Barbra Streisand
Raven-Symoné
Whoopi Goldberg
Miley Cyrus
Amy Schumer
Alec Baldwin
or they could just all leave
‘New Yorker’ Writer Self-Deporting Due to Trump’s Immigration Enforcement
A British writer for the New Yorker — who became a naturalized American citizen — announced that she plans to self-deport due to President Trump’s enforcement of federal immigration law.
Rebecca Mead, a newly naturalized citizen in the U.S., wrote in the New Yorker that Trump’s enforcement of immigration has been influential in her decision to move back to her native England after arriving in New York about 30 years ago.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-journ...orting-due-to-trumps-immigration-enforcement/
---------------------
'member how all those libs were gonna leave if Trump was elected? 'member?
The Liars List:
Jon Stewart
Chelsea Handler
Neve Campbell
Barry Diller
Lena Dunham
Keegan-Michael Key
Chloë Sevign
Al Sharpton
Natasha Lyonne
Eddie Griffin
Spike Lee
Samuel L. Jackson
Cher
George Lopez
Barbra Streisand
Raven-Symoné
Whoopi Goldberg
Miley Cyrus
Amy Schumer
Alec Baldwin
GTFO! Leave you commie ********!
Sent from my iPhone using Steeler Nation mobile app
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113
I don't need to be reminded about how unhinged the libs got over the press conference.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 24,914
- Reaction score
- 11,537
- Points
- 113
Hey, remember Peak Oil? Another hysterical liberal lie.
US Says Conserving Oil Is No Longer An Economic Imperative
WASHINGTON (AP) — Conserving oil is no longer an economic imperative for the U.S., the Trump administration declares in a major new policy statement that threatens to undermine decades of government campaigns for gas-thrifty cars and other conservation programs.
The position was outlined in a memo released in support of the administration’s proposal to relax fuel mileage standards.
Growth of natural gas and other alternatives to petroleum has reduced the need for imported oil, which “in turn affects the need of the nation to conserve energy,” the Energy Department said. It also cites the now decade-old fracking revolution that has unlocked U.S. shale oil reserves, giving “the United States more flexibility than in the past to use our oil resources with less concern.”
With the memo, the administration is formally challenging old justifications for conservation — even congressionally prescribed ones, as with the mileage standards.
The memo made no mention of climate change.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/us-says-conserving-oil-is-no-longer-an-economic-imperative
-------------------------
Drill baby drill
US Says Conserving Oil Is No Longer An Economic Imperative
WASHINGTON (AP) — Conserving oil is no longer an economic imperative for the U.S., the Trump administration declares in a major new policy statement that threatens to undermine decades of government campaigns for gas-thrifty cars and other conservation programs.
The position was outlined in a memo released in support of the administration’s proposal to relax fuel mileage standards.
Growth of natural gas and other alternatives to petroleum has reduced the need for imported oil, which “in turn affects the need of the nation to conserve energy,” the Energy Department said. It also cites the now decade-old fracking revolution that has unlocked U.S. shale oil reserves, giving “the United States more flexibility than in the past to use our oil resources with less concern.”
With the memo, the administration is formally challenging old justifications for conservation — even congressionally prescribed ones, as with the mileage standards.
The memo made no mention of climate change.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/us-says-conserving-oil-is-no-longer-an-economic-imperative
-------------------------
Drill baby drill
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 9,583
- Reaction score
- 5,866
- Points
- 113