• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Could Steelers go Free Agent WR in 2019?

For some reason I thought Sanders was a UFA.
 
The steelers already have Cole Beasley. They just call him Ryan Switzer.

They do need deep threat speed wr. There are plenty in the draft and free agency each year. John Brown is a great example. Arizona let him leave and he didn’t sign a huge contract.
 
tapeANaspirin2it said:
The steelers already have Cole Beasley. They just call him Ryan Switzer.

They do need deep threat speed wr. There are plenty in the draft and free agency each year. John Brown is a great example. Arizona let him leave and he didn’t sign a huge contract.
Click to expand...

Ju My seemed to have some speed yesterday.
 
No

(Minimum character limit filler.)
 
I highly doubt FA wide receiver but maybe in the draft they get a speed guy sort. We need a speed guy but NOT in the free agency market. To much more desperate needs involved




Salute the nation
 
stillwright said:
Ju My seemed to have some speed yesterday.
Click to expand...

Hell yeah that dude has more jets than he's given credit for.

Would be nice to have a pure vertical threat, but it's down on the list of needs IMO.
 
**** no. We have plenty now, the OC just needs to learn how to use them.

We are SOLID with a RB, 2WR, 2TE set. I would use this as a base set and use it 70% of the time, there is so much that can be done out of that set.
 
The reality is that AB got far less double coverage when Bryant was here. He will continue to get that coverage until we have a threat at the #3 receiver spot.
 
21STEELERS21 said:
https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/all/wide-receiver/

The missing piece in this offense is a productive #3 receiver. Wouldn't mind seeing a John Brown or Cole Beasley in Black & Gold in 2019.
Washington looks more like a 3 or 4 year project.
Click to expand...

No way, this isn't the priority.

1.) We have Cole Beasley on the team now; his name is Switzer. Same player and you need only one of those little guys. That's why Dallas got rid of him.
2.) Almost EVERY rookie WR is a washout. Washington will most likely do fine in 2019.
3.) We have so many bigger needs: S, CB, ILB, DL, OG, back up/change of pace RB.
 
Steelerfan81 said:
I don't forsee them going for a WR. And lets be serious, Washington is getting adjusted. He showed during the preseason he can make plays.
Click to expand...

I was with you in the preseason. Washington was amazing!

Now he can't get open, and when he gets open, he can't catch. He is not helping the team at all, so an upgrade would be welcome IMHO.
 
mr peeples said:
No way, this isn't the priority.

1.) We have Cole Beasley on the team now; his name is Switzer. Same player and you need only one of those little guys. That's why Dallas got rid of him.
2.) Almost EVERY rookie WR is a washout. Washington will most likely do fine in 2019.
3.) We have so many bigger needs: S, CB, ILB, DL, OG, back up/change of pace RB.
Click to expand...

L O L @ "we"
 
Cope said:
I was with you in the preseason. Washington was amazing!

Now he can't get open, and when he gets open, he can't catch. He is not helping the team at all, so an upgrade would be welcome IMHO.
Click to expand...

Quick, name all the rookies who were great their rookie year....Moss, Ju Ju....NOT Rice, Ward, et al.
 
mr peeples said:
Quick, name all the rookies who were great their rookie year....Moss, Ju Ju....NOT Rice, Ward, et al.
Click to expand...

et?

did you meant etc. ?

and al or all?

You are falling apart, sad because your alternate account was band?
 
slashsteel said:
No his tongue stays firmly planted in Brady's ***.
Click to expand...



Dang you beat me to it....................... If his tongue isn't in br*dy's *** then something of br*dy's is in his ***.



Salute the nation
 
slashsteel said:
et?

did you meant etc. ?

and al or all?

You are falling apart, sad because your alternate account was band?
Click to expand...

I'm falling apart but you don't know what "et al" means?

Et al. is an abbreviation for et alia (neuter plural). But it can also be an abbreviation for et alii (masculine plural), or et aliae (feminine plural). This phrase means “and others.” Most commonly, et al. indicates other contributors (authors, editors, etc.) in a bibliographic list, such as “Feynman, Hawking, Sagan, et al.” There should always be a period after et al. to show it is an abbreviation.
Click to expand...

You're growing desperate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top