Hey ********, you ever bother to take a look at articles and their links and sources??? I mean, we know you're a lying liar telling lies who shows up here to make statements you can never support or back up, but for God's sake, when we try to bestow knowledge upon you (I know, knowledge is foreign to you), you should take the time to actually read said articles and look at the supporting sources. Might make you look less the *** you already are.
Let me point out what you missed in your soft, daft, uninformed head....
The Nationalfile article summarizes a SCIENTIFIC review. Not a 59-Genders-of-Science Liberal Scientific review. A science review. Nationfile POINTS TO A STUDY.
Did you bother to read the study? Nope, cuz you're a colossal dipshit who believes in junk science and avoids education for kool-aid. I digress...
The study the article references comes from the
International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research. "The
International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research is a peer-reviewed scholarly open access journal concerning the development, distribution, and monitoring of vaccines and their components."
Written by:
- Stephanie SeneffComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge MA, 02139, USA
- Greg NighNaturopathic Oncology, Immersion Health, Portland, OR 97214, USA
ijvtpr.com
Here's an abstract of the article. Now mind you, it's got lots of big words that may scare Liberal HypoFlog, so GO SLOW>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"Abstract
Operation Warp Speed brought to market in the United States two mRNA vaccines, produced by Pfizer and Moderna. Interim data suggested high efficacy for both of these vaccines, which helped legitimize Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the FDA. However, the exceptionally rapid movement of these vaccines through controlled trials and into mass deployment raises multiple safety concerns.
In this review we first describe the technology underlying these vaccines in detail. We then review both components of and the intended biological response to these vaccines, including production of the spike protein itself, and their potential relationship to a wide range of both acute and long-term induced pathologies, such as blood disorders, neurodegenerative diseases and autoimmune diseases. Among these potential induced pathologies, we discuss the relevance of prion-protein-related amino acid sequences within the spike protein. We also present a brief review of studies supporting the potential for spike protein “shedding”, transmission of the protein from a vaccinated to an unvaccinated person, resulting in symptoms induced in the latter. We finish by addressing a common point of debate, namely, whether or not these vaccines could modify the DNA of those receiving the vaccination. While there are no studies demonstrating definitively that this is happening, we provide a plausible scenario, supported by previously established pathways for transformation and transport of genetic material, whereby injected mRNA could ultimately be incorporated into germ cell DNA for transgenerational transmission. We conclude with our recommendations regarding surveillance that will help to clarify the long-term effects of these experimental drugs and allow us to better assess the true risk/benefit ratio of these novel technologies."
Now if you bothered not to be a lazy *** Liberal non-contributor ****, you'd read and realize that the study I pointed you to above (that your lazy *** could not find embedded in the article) ALSO references another study by Dr. J. Bart Classen, who first published a research paper on the possibility of
prion-linked brain degeneration caused by the COVID-19 vaccine last month. These scientists above -
not the "we believe in 59-genders scientists" - build upon his work.
Here is a link (since you aren't very good at reading and clicking hyperlinks) to his prion-linked brain degeneration article:
View attachment 5214
"ABSTRACT
Development of new vaccine technology has been plagued with problems in the past. The current RNA based SARSCoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long term safety testing. In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients. The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations. In the current analysis a total of sixteen UG tandem repeats (ΨGΨG) were identified and additional UG (ΨG) rich sequences were identified. Two GGΨA sequences were found. Potential G Quadruplex sequences are possibly present but a more sophisticated computer program is needed to verify these.
Furthermore, the spike protein, created by the translation of the vaccine RNA, binds angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a zinc containing enzyme. This interaction has the potential to increase intracellular zinc. Zinc ions have been shown to cause the transformation of TDP-43 to its pathologic prion configuration. The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases. The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit"
Stop being such a typical, lazy, stereotypical Liberal with no substance who has no other retort to data except to try to attack the source so as to mitigate it all. It's lazy, it's cheap, and it's ineffective.
When you're done with this *** beating, find your way to the top of this page and contribute.