Be careful, Tim. "Deez Nutz" may have severe allergic reactions and be very triggering to some. They will definitely have to consult their doctor if symptoms occur.
Covid Vaccine
- Thread starter jitter77
- Start date
Be careful, Tim. "Deez Nutz" may have severe allergic reactions and be very triggering to some. They will definitely have to consult their doctor if symptoms occur.
Once again, a peer reviewed study of COUNTLESS studies shows Ivermectin beats COVID. Studies from around the globe.
But Trump pushed it, so the media and Governments shut it down. Which SN member said this should go down as the biggest issue of malpractice in the history of Earth? Kudos to you. You are right.
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Peer reviewed by medical experts that included three U.S. government senior scientists and published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, the research is the most comprehensive review of the available data taken from clinical, in vitro, animal, and real-world studies. Led by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), a group of medical and scientific experts reviewed published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts, expert meta-analyses, and epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution efforts all showing that ivermectin is an effective prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19.
"We did the work that the medical authorities failed to do, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the available data on ivermectin," said Pierre Kory, M.P.A., MD, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC. "We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic."
A focus of the manuscript was on the 27 controlled trials available in January 2021, 15 of which were randomized controlled trials (RCT's), the preferred trial of the World Health Organization, U.S. National Institutes of Health, and the European Medicines Agency. Consistent with numerous meta-analyses of ivermectin RCT's since published by expert panels from the UK, Italy, Spain, and Japan, they found large, statistically significant reduction in mortality, time to recovery and viral clearance in COVID-19 patients treated with ivermectin.
To evaluate the efficacy of ivermectin in preventing COVID-19, 3 RCT's and 5 observational controlled trial's including almost 2,500 patients all reported that ivermectin significantly reduces the risk of contracting COVID-19 when used regularly.
Many regions around the world now recognize that ivermectin is a powerful prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19. South Africa, Zimbabwe, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Mexico, and now, India, have approved the drug for use by medical professionals. The results as seen in this latest study demonstrate that the ivermectin distribution campaigns repeatedly led to "rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality."
"Our latest research shows, once again, that when the totality of the evidence is examined, there is no doubt that ivermectin is highly effective as a safe prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19," said Paul E. Marik, M.D., FCCM, FCCP, founding member of the FLCCC and Chief, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School. "We can no longer rely on many of the larger health authorities to make an honest examination of the medical and scientific evidence. So, we are calling on regional public health authorities and medical professionals around the world to demand that ivermectin be included in their standard of care right away so we can end this pandemic once and for all."
But Trump pushed it, so the media and Governments shut it down. Which SN member said this should go down as the biggest issue of malpractice in the history of Earth? Kudos to you. You are right.
Latest peer-reviewed research: Immediate global ivermectin use will end COVID-19 pandemic
After the most comprehensive review to date, a panel of leading medical experts conclude that ivermectin should be systematically and globally adopted for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19.
eurekalert.org
WASHINGTON, D.C. - Peer reviewed by medical experts that included three U.S. government senior scientists and published in the American Journal of Therapeutics, the research is the most comprehensive review of the available data taken from clinical, in vitro, animal, and real-world studies. Led by the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), a group of medical and scientific experts reviewed published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts, expert meta-analyses, and epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution efforts all showing that ivermectin is an effective prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19.
"We did the work that the medical authorities failed to do, we conducted the most comprehensive review of the available data on ivermectin," said Pierre Kory, M.P.A., MD, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC. "We applied the gold standard to qualify the data reviewed before concluding that ivermectin can end this pandemic."
A focus of the manuscript was on the 27 controlled trials available in January 2021, 15 of which were randomized controlled trials (RCT's), the preferred trial of the World Health Organization, U.S. National Institutes of Health, and the European Medicines Agency. Consistent with numerous meta-analyses of ivermectin RCT's since published by expert panels from the UK, Italy, Spain, and Japan, they found large, statistically significant reduction in mortality, time to recovery and viral clearance in COVID-19 patients treated with ivermectin.
To evaluate the efficacy of ivermectin in preventing COVID-19, 3 RCT's and 5 observational controlled trial's including almost 2,500 patients all reported that ivermectin significantly reduces the risk of contracting COVID-19 when used regularly.
Many regions around the world now recognize that ivermectin is a powerful prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19. South Africa, Zimbabwe, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Mexico, and now, India, have approved the drug for use by medical professionals. The results as seen in this latest study demonstrate that the ivermectin distribution campaigns repeatedly led to "rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality."
"Our latest research shows, once again, that when the totality of the evidence is examined, there is no doubt that ivermectin is highly effective as a safe prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19," said Paul E. Marik, M.D., FCCM, FCCP, founding member of the FLCCC and Chief, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School. "We can no longer rely on many of the larger health authorities to make an honest examination of the medical and scientific evidence. So, we are calling on regional public health authorities and medical professionals around the world to demand that ivermectin be included in their standard of care right away so we can end this pandemic once and for all."
https://covid19.healthdata.org/netherlands?view=cumulative-deaths&tab=trend
Not nearly what your source is making it out to be.
Yeah, I should be careful warning people about posting misinformation including deez nuts. If they have an allergy to nuts, they may report me for wanting them dead or something.
Ivermectin isn't cheap, so I'm not sure why it isn't being studied and used? Oh wait, there's even more money and power to be had elsewhere.
Nutz = potential allergies
Tim = posted nutz
Tibs = potentially allergic to nutz
Tim = wants Tibs dead
Is that how it works in the mind of a lunatic?
DAMNIT SP....stop trying to muddle this thread up with facts.
Well I guess Candace has put a stake in the ground.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 15,452
- Reaction score
- 6,138
- Points
- 113
So, if you became seriously ill with a strange illness, you’d rely on the expertise of a MA or RN, or you’d want to see a doctor and a specialist? Thought so.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 15,452
- Reaction score
- 6,138
- Points
- 113
Hundreds or Thousands? Maybe Tens, MAYBE. I’ll care about the dissenting opinions of doctors once they approach anywhere near 50%, or 15% for that matter. You ONLY care about the dissenting opinions because your ideology wants to believe Covid is something entirely different than what it is (as cases increase 18 months in).
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 15,452
- Reaction score
- 6,138
- Points
- 113
A “let’s say” extrapolation, Tim. Almost, 60% are fully vaccinated, why would MAs be any different?
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 15,452
- Reaction score
- 6,138
- Points
- 113
So what are you (Trumptard who refuses vaccination) arguing? That it’s a coincidence that red states with low vaccination rates that are seeing the surges? That Democrats in red states are, for whatever reason, more likely to refuse the vaccine than those in blue states? It’s incredibly counter-intuitive, is it not? What explains it?
In the last 35 years of my career, I practiced in the same clinic. I worked with some truly wonderful physicians, exceptional diagnosticians. I also worked with physicians that I wouldn't recommend to my worst enemy. Your statement paints with a very broad brush, insinuating that just because a person has M.D. after their name, they are superior to others in the health field, NP's, PA's, etc. While overall, that may be true, in my personal experience, I've known PA's that I would trust more than many physicians. One in particular, an Army trained medic, I used as my personal primary care provider, and chose him over a dozen physicians in the building. So, yes in my case, I did rely on his expertise, and 5 years ago that PA saved my life.
its come to my attention that Jimmy McGill, esquire, is also Dr. Jimmy McGill, esquire.
Thus, Flog should be taking DOCTOR Jimmy's advice, else he/she/they/them is a hypocrite. Correct?
you dim, dumb ************.
Tim has not said he refuses the vaccine. He's stated time and time again that he's waiting for a certain one to come to market (name of which escapes me at this moment). Tim has said he would be more apt to get that vaccine. Tim has stated previously that he's not against a Rona Vax - only that his biggest concerns are the unknown side effects that may sprout up 1-2-3-4-5-6 years down the line. Maybe you should try comprehending what you read before rushing to post. especially when you see that Moderna has had side effects worse than getting the Rona and now so has J&J.
So listening to the audio, sounds like it was a gated building, they wouldn't disclose who they were or where they were from or how they got in.
Does that sit okay with you?
Well here it is, out in the open:
Mandates (in schools especially) because "we're talking about life and death"?
Mandates (in schools especially) because "we're talking about life and death"?
In your never ending attempts to troll, you just trolled yourself. I said we have presented hundreds (aka, 100, 200, 500) if not thousands. Not "hundreds of thousands" you half-baked, dimitted lemming. ****, you can't even read.
How many physicians have received the vax Floggy? You keep throwing paint at the wall. You speak about what the majority says, but you can never, ever identify the majority. You speak of them as "they" say. Who?
Please point to another article where 301 people reply and say that is representative of a million.
No, it's a guess, like 98% of the **** you spout here.
60% of who are fully vaccinated? Link, and supporting data please.
One, you clearly don't understand where the hot spots are. You paint in broad brush. Cases have surged in red and blue states. MA and IL are getting slammed.
Two, you point to non-vaccinated states leading the nation in COVID cases. Yet...the two highest vaccinated states - Vermont (66%) and Massachusetts (63%) both have triple-digit cases growth. Massachusetts ranks 4th in most new cases over the past 14 days.
You and Tiblio continue to correlate lack of vaccinations to political beliefs.
CNN set you straight and explained - there is no correlation between political affiliation and vaccination status.
See...we provided links...to articles...with links to studies. Data.
Fauxci wants to mask 3 year olds now. and potentially vax newborns.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 15,452
- Reaction score
- 6,138
- Points
- 113
LOL! Huh? Where is the orange and red in Vermont and Mass? They’re both up, but Vermont is up to an average of 10 new cases a day and Mass is up to 146. So if you combined them and then multiplied by 9, I guess they’d be giving Missouri a run for its money. Looks like the Illinois counties that neighbor Missouri are the ones getting hit. Strange.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
- Messages
- 7,087
- Reaction score
- 7,206
- Points
- 113
Yep.
They don’t see an issue at all with more injuries, adverse reactions, and deaths from the Wuhan Virus vaccines In eight months than all the other vaccines currently in use combined it more than 20 years.
plus, she were a yt girl. obbeeuslee she were raysiss