That is assuming that you can put in ALL deserving candidates at that one monent in time. If you can not, then each candidate must then be weighted so as to determine who goes first. I do happen to agree that BOTH Ward & Smith are deserving, but if you can only choose one at this time, then recognized achievements must be taken into account.
Your specific example is apples to orange. Sweetness was heads and shoulders above his contemporaries at the time of his selection. Ward and Smith were never a clear once in forever player during their time. They were BOTH incredible WR’s who are deserving, but have and will continue to wait their turn because their accolades were not the greatest of those to play the game. They also have and will continue to see more players above them each year going forward. It is always easier to be selected in the earlier years, not so much later.
This is why I BELIEVE Ward should have the edge over Smith. Sure we can debate the margin of tha edge, but in a perfect world, it should be acknowledged.
Ward has a Super Bowl MVP - this is not debatable
Ward‘s play resulted in rule changes to try and reduce his ability to dominate defenders.
While Smith is deserving, I believe his enshrinement should happen after Ward.
the problem is, the selection is really more of a popularity contest, accolades be damned. If it wasn’t, LC Greenwood would have gotten his jacket YEARS ago.