A lot of artists will have to start paying their own rent

[mightyguru]

I'd much rather that money go to education or something else useful.

 

[Ron Burgundy]

You make a good point. But no matter which artist were talking about it simply isn't a legitimate function of government to patronize artists.

Exactly. Funding art isn't the government's job.
Funny that Libs want the government to pay for all sorts of things it's not supposed to pay for but not pay for a lot of things it IS supposed to pay for (like infrastructure, national defense, border security).

 

[MTC]

Artists? Hahaha hahaha haha. Some of them need a shrink and a real job.

Avis and budget will be hiring service agents for the summer. These artist can work with a brush scrubbing down rental cars, no standard uniform is required, so freedom of expression. They can spray windex on a window canvas full of finger prints and vaccume away any cereal or dirt left behind families on vacation.

#art

 

[ark steel]

They can be hired to paint murals on the new wall!

 

[Omar10213245]

Become a performance artist.

Stand in a bucket of urine, to "protest the treatment of women [in Western countries only, of course]," or to symbolize "man's inhumanity to man [mainly the white man's inhumanity to people of color]."

I have no doubt you would get an endowment.

Without a doubt, probably an endowment and an award for "courage" of some sort.