Problem is, even at his peak- Ike was never that GREAT at sticking to his man.
This is simply not true. Ike had about a 4 year period where he covered every teams #1 reciever side line to side line and shut them down a good 95% of the time.
Problem is, even at his peak- Ike was never that GREAT at sticking to his man.
This is simply not true. Ike had about a 4 year period where he covered every teams #1 reciever side line to side line and shut them down a good 95% of the time.
Problem is, even at his peak- Ike was never that GREAT at sticking to his man.
This is simply not true. Ike had about a 4 year period where he covered every teams #1 reciever side line to side line and shut them down a good 95% of the time.
very true, he could lock down just about anyone in the mid 2000's. I appreciate his career contribution to the team, his approach to the game and professional demeanor. Wish him the best in whatever he does after football. And knowing the type of worker he seem to be, he'll be the guy that will be super-successful with whatever he does in life.
Ike was a good CB. He may be a good safety if we would move him...
Bell rushed on the right side 8 times for 10 yards. Adams was horrible against the Saints and got a lot of help against the bungles. They ran away from him 18 times where Bell got all but 10 of his yards. Also against the Saint they didn't run ONCE outside on the right side. They ran 2 off RT for 7 yards. So the idea that the running game has been lights out since Adams came in is based on what exactly? They ran the ball for 104 yards against the Saints... is that lights out? Adams was so bad against the Saints that one site had a break down of how bad he played.
One of the highlight shows ran all of the back to back....same basic play and cincy never really stopped it.....
agree, Scott. Mitchell needs to learn quickly....he is lost often