In the Lefts never ending quest to monitise our environment, some levity can prevail.
No levity here, just scary reality.
No levity here, just scary reality.
Hey but never mind the science you've got cartoons.......
Why does elfiePolo give a **** about this issue? He said very clearly more than a year ago that "our fate is already sealed."
Yet here he is, more than a year later, saying, "Oh, we have to jump in and stop the climate apocalypse!!"
Wait, stop something that already happened?
Why does elfiePolo give a **** about this issue? He said very clearly more than a year ago that "our fate is already sealed."
Yet here he is, more than a year later, saying, "Oh, we have to jump in and stop the climate apocalypse!!"
Wait, stop something that already happened?
No i said that i believe it's too late to avoid some of the worst of it. By the fate of the human race i'm referring to civilization as we know it.
The human species will not go extinct, even in the worst scenario.
Another year of unfettered CO2 emissions ... we must be cooked by now.
Your governor arrived in the nick of time to ban cow farts. The only reason you have not perished.
Bawk! Bawk! Bawk! The sky is falling!
"Experts" said Arctic sea ice would melt entirely by September 2016 - they were wrong
Dire predictions that the Arctic would be devoid of sea ice by September this year have proven to be unfounded after latest satellite images showed there is far more now than in 2012.
Scientists such as Prof Peter Wadhams, of Cambridge University, and Prof Wieslaw Maslowski, of the Naval Postgraduate School in Moderey, California, have regularly forecast the loss of ice by 2016, which has been widely reported by the BBC and other media outlets.
Prof Wadhams, a leading expert on Arctic sea ice loss, has recently published a book entitled A Farewell To Ice in which he repeats the assertion that the polar region would free of ice in the middle of this decade.
As late as this summer, he was still predicting an ice-free September.
Yet, when figures were released for the yearly minimum on September 10, they showed that there was still 1.6 million square miles of sea ice (4.14 square kilometres), which was 21 per cent more than the lowest point in 2012.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...sea-ice-would-melt-entirely-by-september-201/
------------------------
Just the facts, ma'am
Like with all science fiction, they will just re-write the next book to push the future timeline out farther
As history shows, CO2 level increases have been followed closely by plant growth explosions. The problem we have here is that we have caused huge deforestation problems as well as complete removal of green spaces. Without the area to allow for massive plant growth, we decrease the ability of the planet to capture the excess CO2. .
Bawk! Bawk! Bawk! The sky is falling!
"Experts" said Arctic sea ice would melt entirely by September 2016 - they were wrong
Dire predictions that the Arctic would be devoid of sea ice by September this year have proven to be unfounded after latest satellite images showed there is far more now than in 2012.
Scientists such as Prof Peter Wadhams, of Cambridge University, and Prof Wieslaw Maslowski, of the Naval Postgraduate School in Moderey, California, have regularly forecast the loss of ice by 2016, which has been widely reported by the BBC and other media outlets.
Prof Wadhams, a leading expert on Arctic sea ice loss, has recently published a book entitled A Farewell To Ice in which he repeats the assertion that the polar region would free of ice in the middle of this decade.
As late as this summer, he was still predicting an ice-free September.
Yet, when figures were released for the yearly minimum on September 10, they showed that there was still 1.6 million square miles of sea ice (4.14 square kilometres), which was 21 per cent more than the lowest point in 2012.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...sea-ice-would-melt-entirely-by-september-201/
------------------------
Just the facts, ma'am
Like with all science fiction, they will just re-write the next book to push the future timeline out farther
I think that this argument is more plausible than any cow fart, back yard BBQ pit or evil fossil fuel version. I like clean air as much as the next guy but there is a limit to what makes good common sense. The pendulum never rests as we go to extremes in a quest for individual idealism.
I can't wait to see the end of this Obama regime's overzealous mandates and hope to hell that we don't see round duex in the form of a Hillary invasion. I don't believe our economy will be able to survive another onslaught like we've had to sustain this past century.
Yet the Republican Congress delays a Dept. of Labor overtime change that would result in me getting paid more money but somehow never blocks anything that Bomma's EPA wants to do.
Did the ice caps melt yet?
If anyone really believed in climate change they would be calling for global mandatory emissions reductions, not taxation schemes designed to enrich government coffers and transfer wealth from developed countries to less developed ones while allowing the latter to spew emissions relentlessly.
I've never once heard a report of sea ice being gone by 2016. That would lead to an incredible increase in sea level around the world, and it would have been something every country would have had to prepare for.
If you don't think sea ice is melting in the arctic, then you must have missed what is going on with the countries at the top of the world, and how they are positioning themselves to open and secure trade routes as the ice retreats. Russia is on top of this. The US, Canada, Greenland, Norway, Sweden, and Finland are on the front of what could become an Arctic conflict in the next decade or so.
You notice they don't make China and India do anything.
No fukky fukky?I would start by telling them to stop *******.