No fukky fukky?
Fukky, fukky No. 10.
Sukky, sukky No. 1.
You two are racist !
After all the money and attention Obama threw at climate science, one would think the subject would be defined one way or the other....but the opposite seems to be true. We know now less than we thought we knew before and more about what we knew all along to be phony.
Obama weaponized NASA to participate in his war on climate non-believers and Islamophobia and after 8 years, has proven nothing climate wise but has nontheless imported thousands of Muslims with that cash
President Barack Obama will restart NASA’s mission to Mars after he effectively canceled the program eight years ago, according to an op-ed he wrote.
Obama’s op-ed calls for NASA to send humans to Mars by 2030, but Obama has a long history of slashing programs that would have sent America to Mars much sooner.
Experts blame Obama for shutting down NASA’s plans to send astronauts to Mars in favor of having the space agency fund global warming research and outreach programs.
Obama’s NASA budget shifted money from the exploration and robotics programs to its environmental sciences and “outreach” programs. Because of this focus, Obama’s budget cuts every part to NASA’s planetary science programs, technological development programs and many important future Mars missions managed to not save any money.
NASA’s budget now includes more than $2 billion for the agency’s Earth Science Mission Directorate, which covers global warming science. The money will be specifically allocated to improve climate modeling, weather prediction, and natural hazard mitigation. In comparison, NASA’s other functions, such as astrophysics and space technology, are only getting $781.5 million and $826.7 million, respectively, in the budget.
The Earth Science Mission Directorate’s goal is to help NASA “meet the challenges of climate and environmental change.” The organization is also responsible for global warming models proven to be inaccurate when checked against actual temperature observations.
Spending on the directorate has increased by 63 percent over the last eight years, making it the largest and fastest growing budget of any NASA science program. Over the same time period, the general NASA budget grew only by 10.6 percent—just enough to account for inflation.
http://dailysignal.com/2016/10/11/o...rWWRiSVRlQjZ6bkQ2MGh5YUxubGhDeURVTEJcL0E9In0=
I'll have to do a bunch more research before I can wrap my head around what "meet the challenges of climate and environmental change.” actually entails.
Last edited: