Again Woodson sucked as a 49er.i watched all their games as he was my favorite player back in the day. He was cut his play was so bad and giving up 23 TD passes in that era was horrible. Not gonna lose any sleep over it, he sucked and no amount of revisionist history will change that. He was benched during the game. Funny how we had great defenses even with weak links, see Foote etc. Woodson was that defenses weak link.
Listen, I’m not trying to be combative JP. You are now claiming revisionism of history, yet you have no proof to your assertions and those assertions actually are revising history as recorded.
You claim Woodson sucked as a 49er, yet he was a starter in 14 of 15 meaningful games. He was tied for 3rd in INTs (with 3) amongst 9 players with picks. He was 5th in tackles including havimg more than two teammates who made the pro bowl (which means nothing IMO, but it’s recognition amongst your peers). The only difference between the two were their defensive unit rank. Again SF was 3rd. PIT was 11th and actually surrendered more pass TDs. Another thing, in 97, 18 of 30 teams offenses had 20 or more passing TDs. So that era wasn’t horrible, it was more like the standard.
So you watched every 49er game in ‘97. Thats fine, if you were a season ticket holder good for you. I am a charter member of DirecTV and Sunday Ticket. So since ‘94 I‘ve watched a ton of games every weekend and Monday. It doesn’t prove I thought Rod played well. IMO he was about on par with his replacement in PIT, Woolford. But neither does your opinion that Woodson sucked.
You also claim Rod was benched. He played in 14 of 15 games he was slotted to start. Week 4 he was out due to injury and week 16 he was inactive as SF rested starters. He started the two playoff games. After the GB loss to Farve, his contract expired at the end of the league year. When was he benched? Give us the link that proves Mooch benched him.
As for calling Larry Foote the weak link, well either you think you know about football and your acumen doesn’t match, or you aren’t as old as you portray yourself watching all of SF games in 97. Foote was anything but a weak link in his 6 years starting which included 3 SB appearances with two wins. He was the perfect opposite to Potsie in the defense and then took over for him once Timmons was ready.
I really would like the proof you say is history of Rod being benched, or playing as poor you say he did. Also where is the data of how many TDs he gave up in 97? What you claim isn’t even an opinion because you have no evidence to substantiate it.