I have a student loan. I'm indifferent on the cutting of $10k off it.
I do agree that the government has gone about this all wrong.
For instance, the government allows anyone to obtain a student loan. Most people will get a student loan and go to a state-run college, be it a community college or 4-year university. The borrower is then giving the government its money back to allow them to obtain a piece of paper from the government stating the borrower/student has met educational objectives. During this time, the borrower then must pay taxes on books and supplies they purchase from government run bookstores at these government ran institutions.
The class costs vary depending on degree. As do the book prices (as they always have) and number of books (again, which has always been the case). The books may deviate from semester to semester marginally, but the cost of the book can increase by as much as $5-75 or more. There are only selected numbers of books available. Surprisingly, the number of books is near or close to the number of students registering for class.
Now, books can either be rented or purchased out-right. Renting a book is the cheaper option, but it also serves as a bit of a kick in that "you won't need this book after the semester, anyway." So the student rents a book for $50. Or they can find a PDF of the book for cheaper. The PDF can be downloaded and saved forever. Yet, if a person purchases a book, and considers this an investment in their education and that they might need to review something at a later date, that costs a LOT more. Though by buying the book, they can also re-sell it after the semester/class - either back to the bookstore and receive a percent for what they paid for it ... or to another student taking the class.
Therein lies the problems. IMO, if a person acquires a student loan ---- FEDERAL student loan, not a personal loan from a bank ---- and enrolls in a state-funded college, the tuition, books, etc should be at a lesser cost.
I know of people who had to return to college later in life to educate themselves to find a better job. Due to technology pushing jobs out of the market or even whole industries overseas. As such, these people who never had a student loan before are then shouldering an enormous amount of student loans while also nearing retirement age. If these people had been working since they were able to - age 16 - and have paid taxes on their wages, on purchases, on just about everything the government can tax someone on, then when they most need assistance they turn to educating themselves rather than becoming dependent on the government to help cover their rent, utilities, food, etc, they should receive a cut in costs. the vast majority of these people are already working a full-time job, will then acquire a higher-paying job and thus pay more via taxes by simply working and purchasing **** than they would otherwise
Just my opinion.