Charlie Kirk shot from a distance, direct hit

[Troglodyte]

Maybe you should google the first amendment and read the first five words: "Congress shall make no law...". Nothing in the first amendment prevents a business making decisions to protect their commercial interests or people criticising him for his comments. It never ceases to amaze me how many Americans invoke the first amendment without knowing those important five words.

Which part of the first amendment discusses the government being able to pressure companies to suspend employees?

 

[Troglodyte]

So what's the difference between him an a news "journalist" that's a lefty?

Are you that far gone that everything is now relative to you?

 

[Confluence]

Which part of the first amendment discusses the government being able to pressure companies to suspend employees?

You mean like when health care employees were fired for commenting about the Covid shots?

All those doctors and nurses didn't have sinking ratings on a talk show that mostly featured lefty sympathizers. They had families and dependents.

They were directly silenced by government edict when Biden/pFauci et al. suspended the 1st Amendment, informed consent and my body, my choice to frighten and divide the world.

ABC got rid of an underperforming employee who refused his boss's request to modify his behavior.

 

[SojournerSteel]

So simple that a coal miner can do it. /Joe Biden

Or a farmer/Bloomberg

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

Just STOP with your ridiculous false equivalencies.

Comparing the Hortman murders to Charlie Kirk's assassination is the absolute shining star example of a FALSE equivalency. Yet, of course, you use it.

What's even worse is your LAME, baseless attempt to drawn any equivalency between Trump making a stadium full of people laugh saying he "hates his opponents" and EVERY Leftist media organization/reporter and the loudest of Dem pols calling Trump and the ENTIRE Right NAZIS and HITLER for more than a decade.

If it wasn't so sick, your compare would be funny. But it's not.

Your side's language is an excuse for violence, and an inferred suggestion (sometimes very direct) toward violence.

You lose again, this time woefully.

Now, care to tell us your thoughts on Charlie Kirk's assassination? Can we look at your Twitter feed?

 

[Tim Steelersfan]

Are you that far gone that everything is now relative to you?

It's not relative. It's a material distinction.

 

[Troglodyte]

Comparing the Hortman murders to Charlie Kirk's assassination is the absolute shining star example of a FALSE equivalency. Yet, of course, you use it.

What's even worse is your LAME, baseless attempt to drawn any equivalency between Trump making a stadium full of people laugh saying he "hates his opponents" and EVERY Leftist media organization/reporter and the loudest of Dem pols calling Trump and the ENTIRE Right NAZIS and HITLER for more than a decade.

If it wasn't so sick, your compare would be funny. But it's not.

Your side's language is an excuse for violence, and an inferred suggestion (sometimes very direct) toward violence.

You lose again, this time woefully.

Now, care to tell us your thoughts on Charlie Kirk's assassination? Can we look at your Twitter feed?

Never been on Twitter.

So you can explain why Dear Leader is right and Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson are wrong? This should be good…

 

[Troglodyte]

It's not relative. It's a material distinction.

Remember when Trump tried to sue Bill Mahrer because he had proof he wasn’t a descendant of an orangutan? Did that make sense to you?