P
POP
Guest
If you buy the official story, you got played.
You need to stay away from YouTube for a while. It is rotting your brain.
You need to stay away from YouTube for a while. It is rotting your brain.
I saw it on the Internet so it must be true.
that's what Abraham Lincoln once said. and I believe him
that's what Abraham Lincoln once said. and I believe him
I saw it on the Internet so it must be true.
if it was Faux, y'all locksteppers would be calling for Chelsea's head on a plate.
Yep. And the POOP-brain was like 7-day old hamburger meat to begin with.
How the towers went down is way above my pay grade but the way Building #7 went down makes no sense.
I said before, I'm not into conspiracies. But how do you watch wtc7 come down and not even entertain the idea of a planned demolition? Every single beam holding up the building just melted or gave way at exactly the same time?
To me the twin towers came down due the the crash and fires. I watch as each building failure begins right where the planes hit and once the first domino galls so goes the rest. Makes perfect sense. But building 7? No way.
I said before, I'm not into conspiracies. But how do you watch wtc7 come down and not even entertain the idea of a planned demolition? Every single beam holding up the building just melted or gave way at exactly the same time?
To me the twin towers came down due the the crash and fires. I watch as each building failure begins right where the planes hit and once the first domino galls so goes the rest. Makes perfect sense. But building 7? No way.
The conspiracy nuts glommed onto "Building 7" after a slew of engineers and experts disproved their claims regarding the twin towers.
The facts about Building 7 are not complicated.
(1) The building was deluged by debris when the north tower collapsed.
(2) The building had a massive fire gutting it.
(3) After the twin towers fell, the building still had a massive fire consuming it.
(4) This article has a linked video showing building 7 burning.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html
(5) The National Institute of Standards and Technology issued a report in 2008, saying in part, "The report determines that the actual culprit in the collapse was the combustion of ordinary building furnishings: "These uncontrolled fires had characteristics similar to those that have occurred previously in tall buildings." If the sprinkler system in WTC 7 had been working, it is likely that "the fires in WTC 7 would have been controlled and the collapse prevented." The report also suggests that current engineering standards for coping with fire-induced thermal expansion need to be re-examined, particularly for buildings like WTC 7 that have long, unsupported floor spans. A key factor in the collapse, NIST concluded, was the failure of structural "connections that were designed to resist gravity loads, but not thermally induced lateral loads." According to Sunder: "For the first time we have shown that fire can induce a progressive collapse."
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/
(6) Finally, why in heaven's name would somebody spend the time and effort planting explosives to bring down building 7 - where nobody saw or heard explosions from the building - while having planes fly into the twin towers??? Are you saying that somebody - nobody knows who, but probably a Rothschild or a Jooo or a globalist or all of the above - knew that planes were going to crash into the twin towers, and planned ahead to plant explosives in ...
Building 7???