P
POP
Guest
If you buy the official story, you got played.
If you buy the official story, you got played.
You need to stay away from YouTube for a while. It is rotting your brain.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,605
- Reaction score
- 29,986
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
Yep. And the POOP-brain was like 7-day old hamburger meat to begin with.
I saw it on the Internet so it must be true.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 12,473
- Reaction score
- 18,710
- Points
- 113
that's what Abraham Lincoln once said. and I believe him
Abraham lincoln was a made up character... Washington was an israeli plant.. Hitler was a good guy... Also all of the above is utterly insane
exactly.................
S
Steelers1
Guest
How the towers went down is way above my pay grade but the way Building #7 went down makes no sense.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2014
- Messages
- 6,982
- Reaction score
- 6,963
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 20,582
- Reaction score
- 22,419
- Points
- 113
The pickle overlords of the 7 dimension did it to prove how they can wreak havoc on our republic. YouTube video will soon be made public for all to see.
.
.- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 20,582
- Reaction score
- 22,419
- Points
- 113
...and Islam is love,peace,ieds and hateful oppression of anything non-Islam that goes back thousands of years.
Uhhh, Bon-jooor
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/bufTna0WArc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
if it was Faux, y'all locksteppers would be calling for Chelsea's head on a plate.
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 5,836
- Reaction score
- 4,780
- Points
- 113
I don't care who says it. Anyone who believes this stupid **** is mentally defective. The rare few who aren't mentally unstable are simply spreading this **** around in a vain effort to convince people to give radical Islam a pass because they want to defend them....aka....they refuse to accept reality.
Last edited:
hey Pa, caught me one.
I didn't even look at the video, don't need to.
I know my government lies to me.
I didn't even look at the video, don't need to.
I know my government lies to me.
And the reptalian overlords control Obama
P
POP
Guest
Coming from Mr. Shiny Shoes who lives in La La Land, I will take that as a compliment. Everyone hates the rats. They make all of humanity in worse shape. Nice lifetime legacy.
P
POP
Guest
That's because you actually use your brain instead of letting them lie to you, regardless how much their lies make no sense. Shiny Shoes, on the other hand, is dumber than a bag of hammers.
Yawn.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 5,377
- Reaction score
- 11,904
- Points
- 113
I said before, I'm not into conspiracies. But how do you watch wtc7 come down and not even entertain the idea of a planned demolition? Every single beam holding up the building just melted or gave way at exactly the same time?
To me the twin towers came down due the the crash and fires. I watch as each building failure begins right where the planes hit and once the first domino galls so goes the rest. Makes perfect sense. But building 7? No way.
To me the twin towers came down due the the crash and fires. I watch as each building failure begins right where the planes hit and once the first domino galls so goes the rest. Makes perfect sense. But building 7? No way.
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,605
- Reaction score
- 29,986
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
The conspiracy nuts glommed onto "Building 7" after a slew of engineers and experts disproved their claims regarding the twin towers.
The facts about Building 7 are not complicated.
(1) The building was deluged by debris when the north tower collapsed.
(2) The building had a massive fire gutting it.
(3) After the twin towers fell, the building still had a massive fire consuming it.
(4) This article has a linked video showing building 7 burning.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html
(5) The National Institute of Standards and Technology issued a report in 2008, saying in part, "The report determines that the actual culprit in the collapse was the combustion of ordinary building furnishings: "These uncontrolled fires had characteristics similar to those that have occurred previously in tall buildings." If the sprinkler system in WTC 7 had been working, it is likely that "the fires in WTC 7 would have been controlled and the collapse prevented." The report also suggests that current engineering standards for coping with fire-induced thermal expansion need to be re-examined, particularly for buildings like WTC 7 that have long, unsupported floor spans. A key factor in the collapse, NIST concluded, was the failure of structural "connections that were designed to resist gravity loads, but not thermally induced lateral loads." According to Sunder: "For the first time we have shown that fire can induce a progressive collapse."
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/
(6) Finally, why in heaven's name would somebody spend the time and effort planting explosives to bring down building 7 - where nobody saw or heard explosions from the building - while having planes fly into the twin towers??? Are you saying that somebody - nobody knows who, but probably a Rothschild or a Jooo or a globalist or all of the above - knew that planes were going to crash into the twin towers, and planned ahead to plant explosives in ...
Building 7???
And I've said, ....how long does it take to wire, plant and position the necessary explosives to bring down a building like that. Ok, so we did it well in advance...then why didn't anyone see any wires or explosives strapped throughout the building? No way.
Damn you booted making me post on a poop thread!
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2014
- Messages
- 18,605
- Reaction score
- 29,986
- Points
- 113
- Location
- The nearest Steelers bar.
9/11 conspiracy nut Charlie Vietch changed his mind about the conspiracy theories when he spoke to witnesses, and experts, and saw that his grand conspiracy theory was just smoke, and no fire:
The turning point came when Veitch accepted an invitation to appear in a BBC documentary, Conspiracy Road Trip, made to mark the 10th anniversary of 9/11. Veitch was accompanied by four people, all of whom believed the many conspiracies surrounding the attack. Veitch was convinced that the Twin Towers had been brought down in a controlled explosion by the government, in cahoots with Mossad.
In an attempt to change his mind, the documentary crew took Veitch to meet experts including the chief air traffic controller on the day, demolition specialists and architects. At the start, Veitch was defiant. He showed a video, on a laptop, of the buildings collapsing, saying, “That’s a controlled demolition if ever I saw one.”
He publicly berated the film’s presenter, Andrew Maxwell: “You weren’t there, man. You just have this obedient psychology.” But the more experts he met, the more troubled Veitch became. Finally, when it was shown to him that the towers didn’t, in fact, collapse in a manner consistent with a controlled explosion, and how preposterous his notion was that teams of secret operatives had somehow planted thousands of high explosives in the buildings, he admitted defeat.
“This is hard, you know, because I’ve hung on to these ideas for years now,” he told Maxwell. “I’ve always hung out with people who say, ‘Yeah, conspiracy! 9/11 demolition!’ But now I’ve spoken to a guy who’s explained it. And it makes sense.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...conspiracy-theorist-who-changed-his-mind.html
The turning point came when Veitch accepted an invitation to appear in a BBC documentary, Conspiracy Road Trip, made to mark the 10th anniversary of 9/11. Veitch was accompanied by four people, all of whom believed the many conspiracies surrounding the attack. Veitch was convinced that the Twin Towers had been brought down in a controlled explosion by the government, in cahoots with Mossad.
In an attempt to change his mind, the documentary crew took Veitch to meet experts including the chief air traffic controller on the day, demolition specialists and architects. At the start, Veitch was defiant. He showed a video, on a laptop, of the buildings collapsing, saying, “That’s a controlled demolition if ever I saw one.”
He publicly berated the film’s presenter, Andrew Maxwell: “You weren’t there, man. You just have this obedient psychology.” But the more experts he met, the more troubled Veitch became. Finally, when it was shown to him that the towers didn’t, in fact, collapse in a manner consistent with a controlled explosion, and how preposterous his notion was that teams of secret operatives had somehow planted thousands of high explosives in the buildings, he admitted defeat.
“This is hard, you know, because I’ve hung on to these ideas for years now,” he told Maxwell. “I’ve always hung out with people who say, ‘Yeah, conspiracy! 9/11 demolition!’ But now I’ve spoken to a guy who’s explained it. And it makes sense.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...conspiracy-theorist-who-changed-his-mind.html
P
POP
Guest
The conspiracy nuts glommed onto "Building 7" after a slew of engineers and experts disproved their claims regarding the twin towers.
The facts about Building 7 are not complicated.
(1) The building was deluged by debris when the north tower collapsed.
(2) The building had a massive fire gutting it.
(3) After the twin towers fell, the building still had a massive fire consuming it.
(4) This article has a linked video showing building 7 burning.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-Rare-footage-shows-WTC-7-consumed-fire.html
(5) The National Institute of Standards and Technology issued a report in 2008, saying in part, "The report determines that the actual culprit in the collapse was the combustion of ordinary building furnishings: "These uncontrolled fires had characteristics similar to those that have occurred previously in tall buildings." If the sprinkler system in WTC 7 had been working, it is likely that "the fires in WTC 7 would have been controlled and the collapse prevented." The report also suggests that current engineering standards for coping with fire-induced thermal expansion need to be re-examined, particularly for buildings like WTC 7 that have long, unsupported floor spans. A key factor in the collapse, NIST concluded, was the failure of structural "connections that were designed to resist gravity loads, but not thermally induced lateral loads." According to Sunder: "For the first time we have shown that fire can induce a progressive collapse."
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/design/a3524/4278874/
(6) Finally, why in heaven's name would somebody spend the time and effort planting explosives to bring down building 7 - where nobody saw or heard explosions from the building - while having planes fly into the twin towers??? Are you saying that somebody - nobody knows who, but probably a Rothschild or a Jooo or a globalist or all of the above - knew that planes were going to crash into the twin towers, and planned ahead to plant explosives in ...
Building 7???
You don't even realize how colossally retarded you sound.
I think POP actually enjoys the *** raping he receives daily from Steeltime. I think I will start calling him The Gimp.