• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Covid Vaccine

Yes, I should probably qualify that. Most scrutinized is probably a better term. Though mRNA has been studied since the 1960s. I said probably because while there are hundreds if not thousands of studies on this vaccine, I don't actually know how many have been done on others. Just guessing.
Studied since the 70s but never been used for any vaccines prior to COVID. And if you listen to those that founded/studied/tried developing multiple times before, it wasn’t ready to be used.
 
your next original thought is your first.

since Badcat is barely an IQ point above retard, he's broken it down to Sub-Somalian for you in post 25,142.

you aint welcome.
Okay, since you didn’t take the Covid boosters, you have long Covid, Covid toes and myocarditis. What are taking for it?
 
A tool is someone who makes statements that are blatantly and clearly false, then when corrected with factual information deflects in another direction.

See post 25,135 above. That's you. Literally you.

Lastly, you glossed over the damning information after years of parroting "Every Major Medical Association!!"
  • 73.0% of healthcare personnel whose employers offered on-site flu vaccination received it.
  • 42.9% received COVID vaccination when their employer offered it on-site.
  • Among workers whose employers didn't require, recommend, or offer the vaccines on-site, only 41.4% received flu vaccination and 19.8% received COVID vaccination.
If every major medical association recommends/suggests the Covid vaccine then why do less than a majority of medical professionals themselves not follow the guidance?

And why, when employers didn't require/recommend/offer the vaccines at work, do so few go out to CVS or Walgreens and get the shot? Less than 20% do.

Actions speak louder than words. They clearly aren't scared of Covid, and/or understand the proper risk/reward analysis.
The majority of healthcare workers make $25/hr or less. Damning information 😂.
 
Studied since the 70s but never been used for any vaccines prior to COVID. And if you listen to those that founded/studied/tried developing multiple times before, it wasn’t ready to be used.
Yep, studied since the '70's. Con's last post covered it pretty well. I remembered first learning about it in school in the mid-70's and it was taught as a theory or concept, not yet having a practical value. Kind of like the effect of prostaglandins on inflammation at the time, connecting the dots, but not ready for primetime.

Unless, of course, you find yourself needing to get in a pisssing contest with someone over a trivial technicality where deflection from the primary concept of this thread originated. This product did indeed help some and it also without question, hurt some. While it isn't thalidomide, it also isn't anywhere near what Jonas Salk came up with. Back to the lab is what needs to happen, because this hasn't been perfected, yet.

One jagoff poster keeps this thread going, ignore him, it's beyond time to do so.
 
Top