• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Covid Vaccine

Confluence said:
Said differently, why don't we simply DOUBLE the number of vaccinations? The response is about measuring diminishing returns due to lower efficacy or safety, right? How is that different measuring the 70+ doses now mandated vs the 10+ from a generation ago? How is that possibly safer/better? If it is better, please show me that quantification.....
Click to expand...
That history hasn't been written yet and may take a generation to know the truth. We've come a long way from using leeches as standard care and life expectancy is approaching 80 years, so we must be doing some things right. Wish that I had a better answer, but I don't. There are countless products that have been released to the public with great expectations only to be withdrawn when things went sideways. Best we can do is to attempt to make an informed judgement with as little government interference as possible. Easier said than done.
 
ZonaBurgh said:
That history hasn't been written yet and may take a generation to know the truth. We've come a long way from using leeches as standard care and life expectancy is approaching 80 years, so we must be doing some things right. Wish that I had a better answer, but I don't.
Click to expand...

Lowered infant mortality increases life expectancy quite a bit and the traditional vaccines - polio, typhoid, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus and smallpox - have A LOT to do with that. Those vaccines have been given for at least the past 65 years.
 
Steeltime said:
Lowered infant mortality increases life expectancy quite a bit and the traditional vaccines - polio, typhoid, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus and smallpox - have A LOT to do with that. Those vaccines have been given for at least the past 65 years.
Click to expand...
iu

Don't forget about antibiotics, Reg.
 
Troglodyte said:
I’ll just leave this here while I continue to wait…

Click to expand...
"The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has granted full approval for Moderna's (MRNA.O), opens new tab COVID-19 vaccine, Spikevax, in children aged 6 months through 11 years who are at an increased risk of the disease, the company said on Thursday."

While my kids are long past this age bracket, my "healthy" grandchildren will pass on this one.

Odd that they would name this shot after Spike.
 
ZonaBurgh said:
Moldy bread was a good thing as well. Medicine is 10 steps forward and 1 step back, which means that you can believe the science about 90% of the time.
Click to expand...
I think your underlying assumption is that the science of medicine is only for good.

Firstly, it is obvious to me that medicine is as much art as science.
And those that sell and profit from medicine are profiteering and "fixing" the science to meet their agenda.

So the societal benefits from advances in medicine were largely realized a long time ago, and then basstards sought to direct that profit/benefit to themselves and away from the people.

Thus you have the predicted, planned Covid scam with a readily available solution, planned from NIAID, housed in Murderna and stolen by pFizer.
 
We were told the shots had no impact at all on reproduction. As time passes, we see. Another peer-reviewed study.

The preliminary analysis, by five researchers from the Czech Republic, Denmark and Sweden, was published last week in the International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine.

Rates of successful conceptions according to COVID-19 vaccination status: Data from the Czech Republic​

Abstract​

Background​

Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccination on human menstrual cycle characteristics have been observed, but limited data are available on the relationship between COVID-19 vaccination status and birth rates.

Objectives​

Therefore, we used nationwide data from the Czech Republic to examine rates of successful conceptions (SCs), that is, conceptions leading to live births 9 months later, for women who were either vaccinated or unvaccinated against COVID-19 before SC.

Methods​

Summary monthly COVID-19 vaccination and birth data for women in the Czech Republic aged 18–39 years were retrieved for the period from January 2021 to December 2023. The numbers of SCs per month per 1000 women were calculated for preconception-vaccinated or unvaccinated women, respectively, as well as the number of SCs per month per 1000 women for all women aged 18–39 years.

Results​

During the study period, there were approximately 1,300,000 women aged 18–39 years in the Czech Republic, and the proportion of COVID-19-vaccinated women increased from January 2021 until reaching a steady state of around 70% by the end of 2021. At least from June 2021, SCs per 1000 women were considerably lower for women who were vaccinated, compared to those that were unvaccinated, before SC. Furthermore, SC rates for the vaccinated group were much lower than expected based on their proportion of the total population.

Conclusions​

In the Czech Republic, SC rates were substantially lower for women vaccinated against COVID-19 before SC than for those who were not vaccinated. These hypothesis-generating and preliminary results call for further studies of the potential influence of COVID-19 vaccination on human fecundability and fertility.

Although studies have indicated that COVID-19 vaccination has no appreciable effect on human fertility and that COVID-19 vaccines are safe during pregnancy adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines on menstrual characteristics are well documented, suggesting that COVID-19 vaccination may influence fecundability, that is, the probability of achieving successful conception (SC) within a single menstrual cycle
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top