• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Covid Vaccine

That's why I say. Who is the bigger idiot, Him or the people wasting their time on him?
The point is that all who choose to read the various commentaries, new ideas, refutations of govt lies, actual demonstrable evidence of lying, fraud, etc. can have a reasonable place for understanding the depravity of so called public health officials......many ex FDA folks agree strongly with the information posted here.

Folks need to know that the AMA, John's Hopkins, CDC, Blue Shield, Murderna, the insurers, the distributors, the collectives, etc. and anyone pFlogtard cites are all aligned in the same revenue stream based on massive deception.

If one person doesn't get a clot shot because of the constant demonstration of how poor the science is, and how deep the long con goes, here at SN, good!
 
You literally called me out for only listening to only MY physicians. Sounds like your physician agrees with me. None of the anti-Covid vaxers on this board have any integrity. Like I’ve said many times, you’re a bunch of grown *** men playing a pathetic game of make-believe based on some stupid ideology.

I don’t need to answer questions. I’m saying ask the docs. Turns out, your doc agrees with me. ****** A, dude!

Docs that illustrate MY points? Like your doc! Right?
Your time with this incessant, pFucked up pFalse logic is nearing its end.

When will you apologize for inflicting your retardation here on SN?
 
Your time with this incessant, pFucked up pFalse logic is nearing its end.

When will you apologize for inflicting your retardation here on SN?
Retardation is spending four years arguing that a vaccine is genocidal only to follow the advice of a physician that advocates that very vaccine.

You can’t begin to reconcile that so you resort juvenile name calling. Grow up.
 
Retardation is spending four years arguing that a vaccine is genocidal only to follow the advice of a physician that advocates that very vaccine.

You can’t begin to reconcile that so you resort juvenile name calling. Grow up.
Stop making shiit up
 
You literally called me out for only listening to only MY physicians. Sounds like your physician agrees with me. None of the anti-Covid vaxers on this board have any integrity. Like I’ve said many times, you’re a bunch of grown *** men playing a pathetic game of make-believe based on some stupid ideology.

I don’t need to answer questions. I’m saying ask the docs. Turns out, your doc agrees with me. ****** A, dude!

Docs that illustrate MY points? Like your doc! Right?
It's amazingly sad how unaware you are.

You don't have to answer questions. None of us do. I'm just not sure why you expect us to do things you're unwilling to do.

I can guarantee you no doctors illustrate your points. Being a doctor means you're educated and are capable of learning.
 
The Pittsburgh health systems are UPMC, AHN, St Clair and Independence. Go ahead and contact every one of them and tell them that I am claiming that they recommend and provide the Covid vaccine. They’ll probably refer your dumbass to the Covid guidance section on their websites.

Give me the name of your health system that you claim does not and I’ll do the same.
as I have said before - point to where I've made that claim. Shouldn't be too difficult since you're adamant that I've made such a claim. Find that, then I'll divulge every single bit of my personal information right here in this thread and tag you in it so you don't miss it.

Until then - do provide your first and last name, and the place where you are employed. Specifics matter - in this and in vaccines.
 
Retardation is spending four years arguing that a vaccine is genocidal only to follow the advice of a physician that advocates that very vaccine.

You can’t begin to reconcile that so you resort juvenile name calling. Grow up.
we are not the ones arguing. we're just explaining why you are wrong. again.
 
It's amazingly sad how unaware you are.

You don't have to answer questions. None of us do. I'm just not sure why you expect us to do things you're unwilling to do.

I can guarantee you no doctors illustrate your points. Being a doctor means you're educated and are capable of learning.
I’m illustrating the doctor’s points. You’re claiming they’re corrupt, bought and bribed… until it’s time to see the doctor.
 
Another pathetic conspiracy.
Are you ******* kidding me? You think it is a conspiracy that Phizer would do such a thing?

Phizer agrees to settle

Pfizer Agrees to Pay Nearly 60M to Resolve False Claims Allegations Relating to Improper Physician Payments by Subsidiary​


Friday, January 24, 2025
Share
right caret

For Immediate Release
Office of Public Affairs
Note: View the settlement here.

Pharmaceutical company Pfizer Inc. (Pfizer), on behalf of its wholly-owned subsidiary Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. (Biohaven), has agreed to pay $59,746,277 to resolve allegations that, prior to Pfizer’s acquisition of the company, Biohaven knowingly caused the submission of false claims to Medicare and other federal health care programs by paying kickbacks to health care providers to induce prescriptions of Biohaven’s drug Nurtec ODT.

“Through this settlement and others, the government has demonstrated its commitment to ensuring that drug companies do not use kickbacks to influence physician prescribing,” said Acting Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “The department will use every tool at its disposal to prevent pharmaceutical manufacturers from undermining the objectivity of treatment decisions by health care providers.”

The anti‑kickback statute prohibits offering or paying anything of value to induce the referral of items or services covered by Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, and other federal health care programs. The statute is intended to ensure that medical providers’ judgments are not compromised by improper financial incentives.

The settlement announced today resolves allegations that from March 1, 2020, through Sept. 30, 2022, Biohaven paid improper remuneration, including in the form of speaker honoraria and meals at high end restaurants, to health care professionals to induce them to prescribe the migraine medication Nurtec ODT in violation of the anti-kickback statute. The United States alleged that Biohaven selected certain health care providers to be part of the Nurtec speaker bureau and provided them paid speaking opportunities with the intent that the speaker honoraria and meals would induce them to prescribe Nurtec ODT. The government further alleged that certain prescribers who attended multiple programs on the same topic received no educational benefit from attending repeat programs and that certain Biohaven speaker programs were attended by individuals with no educational need to attend, such as the speakers’ spouses, family members, or friends, or colleagues from the speakers’ own medical practice. The United States contends that this conduct persisted until October 2022, when Pfizer acquired Biohaven and terminated the Nurtec speaker programs.

“Patients deserve to know that their doctor is prescribing medications based on their doctor’s medical judgment, and not as a result of financial incentives from pharmaceutical companies,” said U.S. Attorney Trini E. Ross for the Western District of New York. “This settlement reflects our commitment to hold those who violate the laws accountable, regardless of their status or prestige.”

“Violations of the anti-kickback statute, such as those alleged in this settlement, can unduly influence prescribers and negatively impact taxpayer-funded health care,” said Deputy Inspector General Christian J. Schrank of the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). “HHS-OIG will continue to collaborate with law enforcement partners to ensure that providers and corporations are held accountable if they attempt to bypass laws meant to protect the integrity of federal health care programs.”

“Investigating schemes that undermine the integrity of TRICARE, the health care system for military members and their families, is a top priority for the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General’s Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS),” said Special Agent in Charge Patrick J. Hegarty of the DCIS Northeast Field Office. “Today’s announcement demonstrates our commitment to work with our partner agencies and the Department of Justice to pursue corporations that attempt to corrupt the TRICARE system.”

The civil settlement includes the resolution of claims brought under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act by Patrica Frattasio, a former sales representative at Biohaven. Under those provisions, a private party can file an action on behalf of the United States and receive a portion of any recovery. The qui tam case is captioned U.S. ex rel. Patricia Frattasio v. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd., No. 6:21-CV-06539 (W.D.N.Y.). Approximately $50.2 million of the settlement constitutes the federal portion of the recovery and approximately $9.5 million constitutes a recovery for State Medicaid programs. Ms. Frattasio will receive approximately $8.4 million as her share of the federal recovery in this case.

The resolution obtained in this matter was the result of a coordinated effort between the Justice Department’s Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch Fraud Section, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of New York.

Trial Attorney Jessica Sarkis of the Justice Department’s Civil Division and Assistant U.S. Attorney David M. Coriell for the Western District of New York handled the matter.

The investigation and resolution of this matter illustrates the government’s emphasis on combating health care fraud. One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act. Tips and complaints from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement, can be reported to the Department of Health and Human Services at 800-HHS-TIPS (800-447-8477).

The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.
Updated April 25, 2025
 
I’m illustrating the doctor’s points. You’re claiming they’re corrupt, bought and bribed… until it’s time to see the doctor.

The 10 Biggest Pfizer Lawsuits in Company History

ByJoey CalloPosted onDecember 3, 2024
Pfizer

In the wake of COVID-19, and the severe side effects arising from the vaccine, you must wonder if you can sue the pharmaceutical companies. Such fear gets to you, especially when you learn that even the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) staff will not take a stance on Pfizer’s Covid-19 booster injections due to a lack of verified data. Regardless of how severe the side effects are, Pfizer, Moderna, and other pharmaceutical companies will not be liable. Sadly, even the government will not compensate you for damages. This harsh truth could have you questioning the integrity of such companies. Therefore, we have rounded up the ten biggest Pfizer lawsuits that shed light on the company’s history of denying any wrongdoings, yet still paying millions of dollars in settlements after good attorneys go after them.


10. Protonix – $55 Million

In 2012, Pfizer agreed to pay $55 million for illegally promoting Protonix off-label. Wyeth, the company’s subsidiary, illegally introduced and promoted the drug between February 2000 and June 2001. The drug was used to treat various gastro-esophageal reflux diseases (GERD). Thus, Wyeth sought the FDA’s approval to promote Protonix as a short-term treatment for erosive esophagitis. The FDA approved the drug but later discovered that Wyeth promoted the use of Protonix for all forms of GERD. Consequently, Wyeth was accused of misbranding the drug because it marketed the drug for an unapproved use. Pfizer hence agreed to pay the $55 million, plus interests to settle the lawsuit.
mqqh7p6ysuul4nygpzml.jpg


Subscribe to Lawyer Inc!​

Get updates on the latest posts and more from Lawyer Inc straight to your inbox.
Subscribe
We use your personal data for interest-based advertising, as outlined in our Privacy Notice.

9. Trovan – $75 Million

In 2009, Pfizer was in the spotlight because it had given 200 Nigerian children an experimental anti-meningitis drug, Trovan. The drug caused the death of 11 children while the rest were left with disabilities such as deafness blindness, paralysis, and brain damage. Even when faced with the lawsuit, Pfizer was adamant that the deaths were due to meningitis, not their drug. However, Pfizer agreed to pay $75 million as compensation which the Kano state government agreed to, resulting in the dropping of the $6.5 billion-dollar suit filed by the Nigeria federal government. The Kano state had filed criminal and civil lawsuits against the drug company and demanded $2.75 billion in compensation. From the $75 million settlement, $35 million was for the victims, $30 million for rebuilding the Infectious Diseases Hospital where Pfizer conducted the trials, and the remaining $10 million for covering legal costs that the Kano state government incurred. In 2011, Pfizer started making a series of payments to the victims’ families by paying four families $175,000 each. It took two years before the payments were issued because DNA tests had to be carried out to determine which family was entitled to the payout.

8. Faulty Heart Valves- $215 Million

Pfizer, through its subsidiary, Shiley Inc., sold Bjork-Shiley Convexo-Concave heart valves between 1979 and 1986. Around 55,000 patients received the implant, and in the mid-1980s, the FDA forced their removal from the market. Unfortunately, the damage had already been done. In 1990, under pressure from the FDA and the Public Citizen Health Research Group, Pfizer sent letters to cardiologists who had implanted the devices. Pfizer wanted the surgeons to contact the patients who had the discontinued device. About 20,000 Americans were in danger of the faulty artificial heart valves, and Pfizer added they would follow up the letters with a $2 million campaign to track down each patient and warn them. Since its introduction, the valve had fractured at least 391 times and caused 250 deaths by the end of 1990. By 1991, 450 valve failures had been reported, resulting in 350 deaths. Pfizer dealt with multiple lawsuits and expected a settlement that would range from $155 million to $205 million. In August 1992, a judge wrapped up the suit with a $215 million settlement. Under the settlement terms, Pfizer would pay $90 million to $140 million for the recipients’ medical consultations. The company would also pay $75 million for research to identify any fracture risks and any valve replacement surgeries. Additionally, each valve recipient received $2,500. Pfizer’s then-CEO said the complaints regarding the valve lacked merit and only agreed to the settlements to end the lawsuit.

7. Chantix-$288 Million

Chantix is a drug designed to help smokers stop smoking and is meant for short-term use. The drug was linked with having psychological effects such as suicidal thoughts, depression, hostility, and agitation. According to The Guardian, Timothy John committed suicide in April 2013 after taking the medication. He only took the drug for eight days before hanging himself, joining 24 more people who had committed suicide since its launch in 2006. As a result, around 2,700 lawsuits were filed against Pfizer. Consequently, sales of the drug fell from $848 million in 2008 to $648 million in 2013. In March 2013, Pfizer agreed to settle 80% of the 2,700 state and federal lawsuits against Chantix. The drug company took a $273 million charge to cover the costs and set aside an additional $15 million to wrap up the remaining 20% claims. Although the settlements were made, Chantix could still be a risky drug considering that on July 16, 2021, Pfizer announced that it was recalling two lots of the smoking cessation treatment. It discovered the presence of N-nitroso-varenicline that can potentially increase the risk of cancer in humans.

6. Rapamune – $490.9 Million

According to The New York Times, Pfizer agreed to pay $491 million to settle civil and criminal charges over the illegal marketing of Rapamune. The kidney-transplant drug helps prevent the rejection of a transplanted organ by the body’s immune system. Although FDA had approved the drug in 1999 for use by recipients of kidney transplants, Wyeth promoted the treatment for other organ transplants. It went as far as giving monetary incentives to push the sale of the drug. Wyeth pleaded guilty and was charged with the misbranding violation; hence, agreed to pay a criminal fine of $157.58 million and forfeit assets worth $ $76 million. The settlement increased because the Department of Justice joined the two whistleblowers in their lawsuit in 2010. The whistle-blowers’ lawyer predicted that with the government on their side, they could recover hundreds of millions of dollars in inappropriate billings. Since Rapamune had $376 million sales in 2008, the government was allowed to legally collect up to three times the amount it had been defrauded and pay whistleblowers 15-25% of the total. Of the $490.9 million, $257.4 million went to civil settlements, while the remaining was for criminal fines.

 

5. Medicaid Rebates- $784.6 Million

On April 27, 2016, the Department of Justice announced that Pfizer and its subsidiary Wyeth had agreed to pay $784.6 million to settle cases regarding Medicaid rebates calculation for a gastric drug. Fifteen US states filed complaints in Massachusetts federal court in 2009 claiming that Wyeth had failed to provide state Medicaid programs the same rebates it offered private hospitals. As per the allegations, Wyeth sold two of its PPI (proton pump inhibitor) drugs, Protonix IV and Protonix Oral, through bundled sales agreement such that a hospital earned steep discounts on the two drugs if it availed them within the hospital. The discounts incentivized hospitals to buy the drugs despite there being other competitively-priced and safe drugs readily available. It did not disclose the discounts to avoid paying hundreds of millions of dollars to Medicaid from 2001 to 2006. Wyeth was therefore charged with knowingly reporting to the government false and fraudulent prices of the two drugs. The settlement was divided such that Wyeth would pay $414,248,820 to the federal government, and the state Medicaid programs would receive $371,351,180.

4. Neurontin – $945 Million

In 2004, Pfizer’s subsidiary, Warner-Lambert, agreed to pay $430 million after pleading guilty to criminal charges and civil liabilities associated with the illegal and fraudulent promotion of Neurontin. The company marketed the drug as a treatment for an array of diseases that the FDA had not approved. Besides, scientific studies had proven that Neurontin was ineffective in treating such ailments. The lawsuit was far from over thus in April 2014, Pfizer agreed to pay another $190 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that alleged delayed market entry of the generic versions of Neurontin. According to Reuters, buyers claimed that Pfizer forced them to pay inflated prices for the drug. As always, Pfizer denied any wrongdoing. They said they were happy with the results after the long and hard litigation process. They had spoken too soon because barely six weeks passed before Pfizer once again agreed to pay an additional $325 million to wrap up claims that the company’s Parke-Davis unit had touted Neurontin for non-approved FDA uses. Parke-Davis unit was a Warne-Lambert unit, and the off-label marketing labels went as far back as 1994. The total sum of settlements paled in comparison to the billions of dollars that Blue Cross Blue Shield Association was seeking in damages.

3. Prempro -$1.2 Billion

It seems that when Pfizer acquired Wyeth, it should have considered the lawsuits that came with it. Wyeth was the original defendant in personal liability cases revolving around the hormone replacement therapy drug Prempro. Pfizer took over and, in 2009, had to pay $6.3 million to a breast cancer survivor in compensatory damages because Prempro was among the drugs that caused cancer. The award was the largest then of the three dozen Prempro cases tried in Philadelphia. Unfortunately, the fight was just the beginning for the drug company. In 2012, Fierce Pharma published that Pfizer had agreed to pay $896 million to settle 60% of the cases alleging that Prempro and Provera, also sold by Pfizer’s Pharmacia unit, caused breast cancer. About 4000 lawsuits were still pending, and Pfizer set aside $330 million to cover the settlements, bringing the total amount for the 10,000 cases to $1.226 billion. The pharmaceutical company added that the additional $330 million would likely not be enough to cover the remaining 4,000 claims, but they were still satisfied with the outcome.

2. Celebrex – $1.5 billion

When Pfizer bought out its rival, Pharmacia, it acquired Celebrex, a Cox-2 inhibitor. Investors accused Pfizer and former Pharmacia executives of violating securities laws and sued them, claiming the company and official misled investors regarding Celebrex trial data. In 2007, a judge certified the class action lawsuit and set a trial date. In October 2008, Pfizer reached an $894 million deal to end most of its lawsuits over Celebrex and Bextra; the company hoped to cover up to 92% of the claims through that settlement. However, that was not the end of the matter. In 2012, there was another $164 million deal to wrap up the lawsuit. Pfizer insisted they had not done anything wrong despite offering the settlements. Unfortunately, the matter was far from over. According to Yahoo, Pfizer reached another $486 million settlement still involving Celebrex and Bextra. The amount was supposed to cover shareholders who bought Pfizer’s stock between October 31, 2000, and October 19, 2005. The company had already suffered enough financial damage because, in October 2004, it had lost $70 billion in market value when investors dumped their shares.

1. Bextra, Zyvox, Geodon, and Lyrica -$2.3 Billion

On September 3, 2009, ABC News reported the largest healthcare fraud settlement in the history of the Justice Department. Pfizer and subsidiary, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc., agreed to pay $2.3 billion after the subsidiary pleaded guilty to misbranding Bextra, purposing to defraud. Pfizer had pulled Bextra from the market in 2005 but still promoted the drug for uses and dosages that the FDA had previously declined to approve. As a result, Pfizer had to pay a fine of $1.195 billion- the amount was the highest criminal fine ever imposed in the US. Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc., on the other hand, had to forfeit $105 million. The punitive damages also included $billion that Pfizer agreed to pay to resolve claims of illegally promoting Geodon, Lyrica, Zyvox, and Bextra. The civil settlement was to resolve claims of Pfizer paying kickbacks. From the $1 billion, $331,458,170 went to the state Medicaid program, and $668,514,830 to the federal government. It was the largest fraud settlement in the litigation history of pharmaceutical companies.
 
as I have said before - point to where I've made that claim. Shouldn't be too difficult since you're adamant that I've made such a claim. Find that, then I'll divulge every single bit of my personal information right here in this thread and tag you in it so you don't miss it.

Until then - do provide your first and last name, and the place where you are employed. Specifics matter - in this and in vaccines.
I never asked for anyone’s name, just the name of the health system they are supposedly not slandering.
 
we are not the ones arguing. we're just explaining why you are wrong. again.
Wrong like all the health systems you utilize?

You have all made your arguments against the Covid vaccine even more incoherent by essentially admitting that you utilize doctors and health systems that recommend and provide the it. I didn’t think that was possible.
 

5. Medicaid Rebates- $784.6 Million

On April 27, 2016, the Department of Justice announced that Pfizer and its subsidiary Wyeth had agreed to pay $784.6 million to settle cases regarding Medicaid rebates calculation for a gastric drug. Fifteen US states filed complaints in Massachusetts federal court in 2009 claiming that Wyeth had failed to provide state Medicaid programs the same rebates it offered private hospitals. As per the allegations, Wyeth sold two of its PPI (proton pump inhibitor) drugs, Protonix IV and Protonix Oral, through bundled sales agreement such that a hospital earned steep discounts on the two drugs if it availed them within the hospital. The discounts incentivized hospitals to buy the drugs despite there being other competitively-priced and safe drugs readily available. It did not disclose the discounts to avoid paying hundreds of millions of dollars to Medicaid from 2001 to 2006. Wyeth was therefore charged with knowingly reporting to the government false and fraudulent prices of the two drugs. The settlement was divided such that Wyeth would pay $414,248,820 to the federal government, and the state Medicaid programs would receive $371,351,180.

4. Neurontin – $945 Million

In 2004, Pfizer’s subsidiary, Warner-Lambert, agreed to pay $430 million after pleading guilty to criminal charges and civil liabilities associated with the illegal and fraudulent promotion of Neurontin. The company marketed the drug as a treatment for an array of diseases that the FDA had not approved. Besides, scientific studies had proven that Neurontin was ineffective in treating such ailments. The lawsuit was far from over thus in April 2014, Pfizer agreed to pay another $190 million to settle a class-action lawsuit that alleged delayed market entry of the generic versions of Neurontin. According to Reuters, buyers claimed that Pfizer forced them to pay inflated prices for the drug. As always, Pfizer denied any wrongdoing. They said they were happy with the results after the long and hard litigation process. They had spoken too soon because barely six weeks passed before Pfizer once again agreed to pay an additional $325 million to wrap up claims that the company’s Parke-Davis unit had touted Neurontin for non-approved FDA uses. Parke-Davis unit was a Warne-Lambert unit, and the off-label marketing labels went as far back as 1994. The total sum of settlements paled in comparison to the billions of dollars that Blue Cross Blue Shield Association was seeking in damages.

3. Prempro -$1.2 Billion

It seems that when Pfizer acquired Wyeth, it should have considered the lawsuits that came with it. Wyeth was the original defendant in personal liability cases revolving around the hormone replacement therapy drug Prempro. Pfizer took over and, in 2009, had to pay $6.3 million to a breast cancer survivor in compensatory damages because Prempro was among the drugs that caused cancer. The award was the largest then of the three dozen Prempro cases tried in Philadelphia. Unfortunately, the fight was just the beginning for the drug company. In 2012, Fierce Pharma published that Pfizer had agreed to pay $896 million to settle 60% of the cases alleging that Prempro and Provera, also sold by Pfizer’s Pharmacia unit, caused breast cancer. About 4000 lawsuits were still pending, and Pfizer set aside $330 million to cover the settlements, bringing the total amount for the 10,000 cases to $1.226 billion. The pharmaceutical company added that the additional $330 million would likely not be enough to cover the remaining 4,000 claims, but they were still satisfied with the outcome.

2. Celebrex – $1.5 billion

When Pfizer bought out its rival, Pharmacia, it acquired Celebrex, a Cox-2 inhibitor. Investors accused Pfizer and former Pharmacia executives of violating securities laws and sued them, claiming the company and official misled investors regarding Celebrex trial data. In 2007, a judge certified the class action lawsuit and set a trial date. In October 2008, Pfizer reached an $894 million deal to end most of its lawsuits over Celebrex and Bextra; the company hoped to cover up to 92% of the claims through that settlement. However, that was not the end of the matter. In 2012, there was another $164 million deal to wrap up the lawsuit. Pfizer insisted they had not done anything wrong despite offering the settlements. Unfortunately, the matter was far from over. According to Yahoo, Pfizer reached another $486 million settlement still involving Celebrex and Bextra. The amount was supposed to cover shareholders who bought Pfizer’s stock between October 31, 2000, and October 19, 2005. The company had already suffered enough financial damage because, in October 2004, it had lost $70 billion in market value when investors dumped their shares.

1. Bextra, Zyvox, Geodon, and Lyrica -$2.3 Billion

On September 3, 2009, ABC News reported the largest healthcare fraud settlement in the history of the Justice Department. Pfizer and subsidiary, Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc., agreed to pay $2.3 billion after the subsidiary pleaded guilty to misbranding Bextra, purposing to defraud. Pfizer had pulled Bextra from the market in 2005 but still promoted the drug for uses and dosages that the FDA had previously declined to approve. As a result, Pfizer had to pay a fine of $1.195 billion- the amount was the highest criminal fine ever imposed in the US. Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc., on the other hand, had to forfeit $105 million. The punitive damages also included $billion that Pfizer agreed to pay to resolve claims of illegally promoting Geodon, Lyrica, Zyvox, and Bextra. The civil settlement was to resolve claims of Pfizer paying kickbacks. From the $1 billion, $331,458,170 went to the state Medicaid program, and $668,514,830 to the federal government. It was the largest fraud settlement in the litigation history of pharmaceutical companies.
I’m not impressed.

 
I’m illustrating the doctor’s points. You’re claiming they’re corrupt, bought and bribed… until it’s time to see the doctor.
Dodge.
Deflect.
Change the subject.
Ignore.
Rinse and repeat.

You're nothing if not predictable.
 
I never asked for anyone’s name, just the name of the health system they are supposedly not slandering.
and again. I'll type this as slowly as I possibly can...

I, like others, made my own decision based on the information provided. Not ALL physicians were pushing the Holy Vaxx. Some were against it. Others advised their patients to do their own research to see if it was good for them.

I took that advice... after seeing firsthand what it did to me. I say it attributed to my emergency appendectomy since that happened less than a week after the second shot. So, for the 133rd time, I did get the shot. I got the second booster. Then my appendix blew up. Is this a likely cause? In my mind, yes. Has my doctor said it was directly correlated? No, we didn't discuss it. I just tell him I'm not getting another booster. We move on. In fact, it hasn't been discussed in more than three years. Odd, that, ain't it?

So, no, I am not "slandering" any health system. I am taking personal accountability for my decision to forego any further Covid Booster. Simple as that. I've not even said no one should get the shot. I've said its not for me and others should consider the information now out there about the rushed to the market vaccine that was not tested the way other vaccines are.

But, you do you.
 
Top