You are this stupid. Acronyms often have multiple or several meanings.
Now type in Minor Attracted Persons.
You're welcome. That will be another $19.95 to my Venmo account.
Covid Vaccine
- Thread starter jitter77
- Start date
You are this stupid. Acronyms often have multiple or several meanings.
Now type in Minor Attracted Persons.
You're welcome. That will be another $19.95 to my Venmo account.
or ... and follow as closely as you can, Captain Smoothbrain...
the topic had somehow been deflected (your specialty) to LGBTQ....
so with that being the topic and someone says "pedos and MAPs" your lack of critical thinking skills did not allow you to piece together a 2-piece puzzle and solve Jeopardy.
you really are this stupid. every post you make on this side of the board lowers the overall IQ of the board and shames Al Gore for creating the internet.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,537
- Reaction score
- 6,568
- Points
- 113
Oh, apparently it’s a thing, but whether a person is aware of it as a thing and how much they go on and on about it is another thing altogether.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,537
- Reaction score
- 6,568
- Points
- 113
And the fact that you’re very familiar with this rather obscure one makes you sophisticated, I suppose? Maybe use your knowledge of it in conversations during Christmas parties. You’ll impress everyone.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,537
- Reaction score
- 6,568
- Points
- 113
And you and Tim really are socially awkward to think everyone if familiar with such a thing.
if you have kids and care about them, you are more aware of the world rather than what effects you personally, Captain Smoothbrain.
This, just stop.
It's ok we know IT DOESN'T AFFECT YOU so you don't care about it. Those other families victimized by pedos, trans shooters, illegal aliens...doesn't affect you so you don't care.
You're a **** human. We knew this already, it just bears repeating.
You're ignorance on the topic only reinforces that well...you're ignorant. As I showed you, a simple Google search shows endless results. There are thousands and thousands of results to be had. If you stepped out of your echo chamber...
Again, as we said over a decade ago, normalizing trans would be a slippery slope and lead to normalizing pedos. Y'all said no way.
Here we are.
All you have to do is...wait.
He doesn't care about other people and what they suffer. He's made that evident in the past few pages. Just dragging dogs around on 37 mile hikes daily and killing them.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 11,420
- Reaction score
- 15,957
- Points
- 113
He's said versions of this repeatedly. I guess its how he decides not care about the atrocities committed by those he has strongly supported.
There must be a term for his holier-than-thou narcissistic attitude that usually gets followed by a left turn, don't give a fuuck about whatever because OMB or he got an instructional email.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 11,420
- Reaction score
- 15,957
- Points
- 113
Nailed it
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 11,420
- Reaction score
- 15,957
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 11,420
- Reaction score
- 15,957
- Points
- 113
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 11,420
- Reaction score
- 15,957
- Points
- 113
for the tard who will not click links...
December 9, 2025
By Sean Adl-Tabatabai
Just days after Professor Francis Boyle agreed to testify against Bill Gates and Albert Bourla regarding their depopulation agenda, he was found dead.
Boyle, author of the US Bioweapons Act, had referred to mRNA jabs as “bioweapons” and “Franken-shots.”
Medium.com reports: But where does the Pentagon fit into all of this?
In a resurfaced interview that will leave you speechless, Prof. Boyle, who literally wrote the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, stated that both SARS-CoV-2 and the mRNA injections were DARPA-funded offensive bioweapons programs from the outset. According to Boyle, the gain-of-function narrative was just a cover story. The true aim was always to develop “lethal yet vaccinate-able” population-reduction technology. He named key figures involved, including UNC, Wuhan, Fauci, Daszak, and Baric.
Boyle went further, labeling the shots “synthetic biological weapons of mass destruction,” citing their potential to cause autoimmune damage, prion-like misfolding, and rapid cancers.
He filed lawsuits, appealed to Congress, and warned the public. But just 20 days after agreeing to testify for the prosecution, he was found dead. This tragic turn of events follows a pattern observed with numerous doctors and whistleblowers since 2020. Is it simply coincidence?
If a man who literally drafted the law defining bioweapons says we have just witnessed the largest biowarfare attack in history, why isn’t every major news outlet covering this?
The most chilling aspect? Boyle had already predicted the exact outcomes we are witnessing now: myocarditis, strokes, infertility, and the explosion of cancers among the vaccinated.
He explained that the spike protein itself was the weapon and that the lipid nanoparticles were engineered to cross the blood-brain barrier. This was no accident. It was a military-grade kill vector disguised as a “public health” initiative.
So here’s the question that haunts me: Who issued the order? Who stands to profit the most? And when will the Nuremberg-style trials begin?
Rant done, let’s talk about this man in more detail. Prof. Francis Boyle, a respected professor of international law, passed away on January 30, 2025, at the age of 74. Boyle was known for his expertise in bioweapons law and his staunch opposition to high-risk biological research. He authored the U.S. Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, a piece of legislation designed to prevent the development and use of biological weapons. Boyle’s most recent work focused on the dangers he saw in gain-of-function research and the COVID-19 pandemic response, which he believed was connected to bioweapons research.
Boyle was an outspoken critic of high-risk biological research labs, which he argued violated the bioweapons act he helped draft. He warned that such labs posed an existential risk to public health and national security. In 2006, Boyle represented residents of a Boston neighborhood who opposed the construction of a high-risk biological research facility in their area. He argued that the lab would likely engage in dangerous biological warfare research. Boyle was also one of the first to publicly suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was engineered, pointing to the possibility of a lab leak from a Chinese facility.
In January 2020, Boyle warned governments worldwide about the potential bioweapon nature of COVID-19. He believed the virus was deliberately engineered and not a product of natural zoonotic transmission. He publicly stated that COVID-19 should be treated as a biological warfare weapon, not just another virus. Boyle repeatedly criticized Dr. Anthony Fauci and other public health officials for their handling of the pandemic, accusing them of covering up the true origins of the virus. He claimed Fauci knew about the Chinese lab leak and deliberately concealed this information. Boyle argued that Fauci’s actions had caused unnecessary harm and that he should face legal consequences for his role.
Boyle’s warnings about the dangers of COVID-19 were based on his understanding of bioweapons development. He believed the virus and the subsequent mRNA vaccines were part of a larger, ongoing bioweapons program. Boyle described the mRNA vaccines as “synthetic biological weapons of mass destruction,” a term he used to highlight the dangers he saw in the widespread distribution of the vaccine. He argued that the vaccines would lead to autoimmune disorders, cancers, and other health problems in the vaccinated population. Boyle’s concerns were grounded in his understanding of how biological agents are engineered and the risks associated with such technologies.
Boyle’s opposition to the pandemic response extended beyond his criticism of the virus itself. He also spoke out against the proposed amendments to the World Health Organization’s International Health Regulations (IHR), which he saw as an infringement on national sovereignty. Boyle believed the amendments were part of a broader effort to centralize global health policy and reduce the autonomy of individual nations. He argued that these amendments would allow international organizations to impose top-down control over health and medical decisions, bypassing the authority of national governments.
Boyle’s legal work and advocacy extended far beyond the pandemic. He had a long history of representing marginalized communities, including Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Palestinian Authority, and Native American tribes. Throughout his career, Boyle was known for his commitment to human rights and justice. He was an outspoken advocate for the rights of oppressed people and was unafraid to take on powerful entities in his pursuit of justice. Boyle’s influence extended beyond his legal work, and he became a key figure in the health freedom movement, providing counsel to many activists and organizations fighting against government overreach.
In his final years, Boyle continued to speak out against what he saw as the dangers posed by biological research and the misuse of scientific advancements. He was particularly concerned about the implications of gain-of-function research, which involves modifying viruses to make them more transmissible or dangerous. Boyle called for an immediate ban on all gain-of-function research, arguing that it was too risky and should be criminalized. He also spoke out against the broader use of bioweapons technologies, which he believed were being developed under the guise of public health initiatives.
Boyle’s passing comes at a time when his warnings about bioweapons research and the dangers of the pandemic are becoming increasingly relevant. The global response to COVID-19 and the ongoing debate over vaccine safety and efficacy have highlighted the concerns that Boyle raised throughout his career. His legacy as a legal expert and advocate for public health will continue to influence discussions about bioweapons, gain-of-function research, and government overreach.
Boyle’s death follows a troubling pattern seen with other whistleblowers and critics of the pandemic response. Many individuals who have raised concerns about the handling of COVID-19, the origins of the virus, and the role of public health officials have faced significant pushback and even death under mysterious circumstances. Boyle was found dead just 20 days after agreeing to testify against key figures involved in the pandemic response, including Bill Gates and Albert Bourla. This fact, coupled with the timing of his death, has led some to question whether there is a deeper conspiracy at play.
Boyle’s passing leaves a void in the ongoing fight against bioweapons research and government overreach. His unique expertise and unwavering commitment to justice were invaluable to the health freedom movement. Many activists and legal experts are now left without one of their strongest voices. However, Boyle’s work will continue to inspire those who remain committed to exposing the truth and fighting for accountability. His death serves as a reminder of the importance of questioning authority and seeking transparency, especially when it comes to public health and the development of dangerous technologies.
Prof. Francis Boyle Killed Weeks Before Explosive Testimony Against Bill Gates – What Did He Know?
December 9, 2025
By Sean Adl-Tabatabai
Just days after Professor Francis Boyle agreed to testify against Bill Gates and Albert Bourla regarding their depopulation agenda, he was found dead.
Boyle, author of the US Bioweapons Act, had referred to mRNA jabs as “bioweapons” and “Franken-shots.”
Medium.com reports: But where does the Pentagon fit into all of this?
In a resurfaced interview that will leave you speechless, Prof. Boyle, who literally wrote the 1989 Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, stated that both SARS-CoV-2 and the mRNA injections were DARPA-funded offensive bioweapons programs from the outset. According to Boyle, the gain-of-function narrative was just a cover story. The true aim was always to develop “lethal yet vaccinate-able” population-reduction technology. He named key figures involved, including UNC, Wuhan, Fauci, Daszak, and Baric.
Boyle went further, labeling the shots “synthetic biological weapons of mass destruction,” citing their potential to cause autoimmune damage, prion-like misfolding, and rapid cancers.
He filed lawsuits, appealed to Congress, and warned the public. But just 20 days after agreeing to testify for the prosecution, he was found dead. This tragic turn of events follows a pattern observed with numerous doctors and whistleblowers since 2020. Is it simply coincidence?
If a man who literally drafted the law defining bioweapons says we have just witnessed the largest biowarfare attack in history, why isn’t every major news outlet covering this?
The most chilling aspect? Boyle had already predicted the exact outcomes we are witnessing now: myocarditis, strokes, infertility, and the explosion of cancers among the vaccinated.
He explained that the spike protein itself was the weapon and that the lipid nanoparticles were engineered to cross the blood-brain barrier. This was no accident. It was a military-grade kill vector disguised as a “public health” initiative.
So here’s the question that haunts me: Who issued the order? Who stands to profit the most? And when will the Nuremberg-style trials begin?
Rant done, let’s talk about this man in more detail. Prof. Francis Boyle, a respected professor of international law, passed away on January 30, 2025, at the age of 74. Boyle was known for his expertise in bioweapons law and his staunch opposition to high-risk biological research. He authored the U.S. Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, a piece of legislation designed to prevent the development and use of biological weapons. Boyle’s most recent work focused on the dangers he saw in gain-of-function research and the COVID-19 pandemic response, which he believed was connected to bioweapons research.
Boyle was an outspoken critic of high-risk biological research labs, which he argued violated the bioweapons act he helped draft. He warned that such labs posed an existential risk to public health and national security. In 2006, Boyle represented residents of a Boston neighborhood who opposed the construction of a high-risk biological research facility in their area. He argued that the lab would likely engage in dangerous biological warfare research. Boyle was also one of the first to publicly suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was engineered, pointing to the possibility of a lab leak from a Chinese facility.
In January 2020, Boyle warned governments worldwide about the potential bioweapon nature of COVID-19. He believed the virus was deliberately engineered and not a product of natural zoonotic transmission. He publicly stated that COVID-19 should be treated as a biological warfare weapon, not just another virus. Boyle repeatedly criticized Dr. Anthony Fauci and other public health officials for their handling of the pandemic, accusing them of covering up the true origins of the virus. He claimed Fauci knew about the Chinese lab leak and deliberately concealed this information. Boyle argued that Fauci’s actions had caused unnecessary harm and that he should face legal consequences for his role.
Boyle’s warnings about the dangers of COVID-19 were based on his understanding of bioweapons development. He believed the virus and the subsequent mRNA vaccines were part of a larger, ongoing bioweapons program. Boyle described the mRNA vaccines as “synthetic biological weapons of mass destruction,” a term he used to highlight the dangers he saw in the widespread distribution of the vaccine. He argued that the vaccines would lead to autoimmune disorders, cancers, and other health problems in the vaccinated population. Boyle’s concerns were grounded in his understanding of how biological agents are engineered and the risks associated with such technologies.
Boyle’s opposition to the pandemic response extended beyond his criticism of the virus itself. He also spoke out against the proposed amendments to the World Health Organization’s International Health Regulations (IHR), which he saw as an infringement on national sovereignty. Boyle believed the amendments were part of a broader effort to centralize global health policy and reduce the autonomy of individual nations. He argued that these amendments would allow international organizations to impose top-down control over health and medical decisions, bypassing the authority of national governments.
Boyle’s legal work and advocacy extended far beyond the pandemic. He had a long history of representing marginalized communities, including Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Palestinian Authority, and Native American tribes. Throughout his career, Boyle was known for his commitment to human rights and justice. He was an outspoken advocate for the rights of oppressed people and was unafraid to take on powerful entities in his pursuit of justice. Boyle’s influence extended beyond his legal work, and he became a key figure in the health freedom movement, providing counsel to many activists and organizations fighting against government overreach.
In his final years, Boyle continued to speak out against what he saw as the dangers posed by biological research and the misuse of scientific advancements. He was particularly concerned about the implications of gain-of-function research, which involves modifying viruses to make them more transmissible or dangerous. Boyle called for an immediate ban on all gain-of-function research, arguing that it was too risky and should be criminalized. He also spoke out against the broader use of bioweapons technologies, which he believed were being developed under the guise of public health initiatives.
Boyle’s passing comes at a time when his warnings about bioweapons research and the dangers of the pandemic are becoming increasingly relevant. The global response to COVID-19 and the ongoing debate over vaccine safety and efficacy have highlighted the concerns that Boyle raised throughout his career. His legacy as a legal expert and advocate for public health will continue to influence discussions about bioweapons, gain-of-function research, and government overreach.
Boyle’s death follows a troubling pattern seen with other whistleblowers and critics of the pandemic response. Many individuals who have raised concerns about the handling of COVID-19, the origins of the virus, and the role of public health officials have faced significant pushback and even death under mysterious circumstances. Boyle was found dead just 20 days after agreeing to testify against key figures involved in the pandemic response, including Bill Gates and Albert Bourla. This fact, coupled with the timing of his death, has led some to question whether there is a deeper conspiracy at play.
Boyle’s passing leaves a void in the ongoing fight against bioweapons research and government overreach. His unique expertise and unwavering commitment to justice were invaluable to the health freedom movement. Many activists and legal experts are now left without one of their strongest voices. However, Boyle’s work will continue to inspire those who remain committed to exposing the truth and fighting for accountability. His death serves as a reminder of the importance of questioning authority and seeking transparency, especially when it comes to public health and the development of dangerous technologies.
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,537
- Reaction score
- 6,568
- Points
- 113
The sanctimony coming from a Trump Supporter. You’re probably Catholic as well.- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,537
- Reaction score
- 6,568
- Points
- 113
RuPaul’s and Dame Edna were mainstream 30 years ago and 20 years later you had an epiphany?
Strange you didn’t freak out when Megyn Kelly tried to normalize Epstein’s pedophilia. Strange you were silent about the Catholic Church’s pedophilia crisis. Seems you pick and choose your pedophilia outrage.
Once again, you insist on repetitively proving yourself publicly an idiot.
Just a couple months ago, typed in this forum, I told you I was not Catholic.
Please continue the entertainment I pay for.
Last edited:
They aren't/weren't pedophiles.
Making a prediction 10 years ago that normalizing trans mental illness would lead one day to normalizing pedophilia isn't outrage. It's seeing the writing on the wall and predicting how things will come to be. We were right.
Normalizing pedophilia is a 99.997% issue. 99.997% are vehemently against it. You're clearly a part of the 0.003% in favor. Because IT DOESN'T AFFECT YOU so why should you care?
Do you strive to exist on the wrong side of history on each and every issue?
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2014
- Messages
- 16,537
- Reaction score
- 6,568
- Points
- 113
You’re literally equating trans with pedophilia. Are they the exception?
Not only a strawman argument, but an incoherent one at that. Lose an argument, change the argument and make accusations.
Megyn Kelly isn’t trans. She’s normalizing pedophilia, not Trans people. But you don’t have a problem with her take. Why, because it’s heterosexual pedophilia involving middle aged men and teenage girls. You don’t have a problem with Trump bragging to Howard Steen about being a predator of teenage girls. Again, you seemingly pick and choose your pedophilia outrage.
what will it take to get an electrical impulse in the smooth brain so you can understand no one gives a **** about trannies. but that there ARE trannies and there ARE people using the trannie cloak to allow themselves access to areas they should not be in? how can you be so completely and totally naive to casually dismiss the notion that this could happen, and then, when proven that it does indeed happen, become so flippant about it and deflect?
oh. that's right. because it doesnt effect YOU personally.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 1,934
- Reaction score
- 3,474
- Points
- 113
Can you direct me/us to the Catholic Church Pedophilias thread on the board?
Didn't know one existed, and I'd like to vent my outrage now.
Although, as a recovering Catholic, I've been publicly outraged and sounding off on the corruption that is the Catholic Church since before Sinead O'Connor tore up the pope's picture on Saturday Night Live.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 1,934
- Reaction score
- 3,474
- Points
- 113
Ripped RIGHT out of the Trog playbook.
Yes or no?