I don't think you can read or understand the actual numbers. I read the actual study, did you? Conclusions are typically political bullshit the numbers themselves don't lie.
Goodness! Let me break down the sequence for ya Crayola
1. You sent a link to back up some point you horridly didn't make, as usual
2. I referenced the link which stated that the J&J was no longer issued as it was not safe
3. You said it was resumed and that they wouldn't have resumed it if it wasn't safe
4. I showed you that you were incorrect, it wasn't resumed
5. You gave me rolling eyes and said it was resumed for a few months
#3 is misleading as your point is why would a pediatric group resume an unsafe vaccine, leading belief that it's still in use. If you'd have said "they wouldn't have resumed the vaccine for a few months if it wasn't safe" would be incorrect as they banned it altogether because it was unsafe and unhealthy, but at least you wouldn't spout half truths.