National security or taking what China and Russia have?
Trump meant what he said about making America great again.
National security may be just a perk.
Military action" doesn't mean a forceful takeover of Greenland, it means if russia/china makes moves to infiltrate, the US will be there to greet them.
While Russia and China have growing interests in the Arctic's resources and strategic waterways, current evidence doesn't show them
actively threatening Greenland with military occupation, but rather pursuing economic and strategic influence, with US President Trump recently raising alarms about their potential to take control, prompting Greenland's leaders to assert their right to self-determination. China invests in Greenland's critical minerals, while Russia focuses on Arctic resource extraction and shipping routes, but neither has military forces poised to seize the island; Greenlanders want to decide their own future, not be a geopolitical pawn.
Russia's Arctic Presence
- Strategic Focus: Russia, as the largest Arctic nation, is heavily invested in the region for oil, gas, minerals, and its Northern Sea Route for trade.
- Geopolitical Interest: Moscow views the Arctic as vital for its economy and security, but its recent rhetoric hasn't explicitly threatened Greenland itself, despite concerns about US actions there.
China's Interest
- Economic Investment: China has invested in Greenland's mining sector, particularly for rare earths and other critical materials, recognizing its vast mineral wealth.
- Potential Security Implications: China's economic activities raise concerns about its long-term strategic goals in the Arctic, though these are primarily economic, not military threats.
Aug 28, 2025Why
Greenland is a hot issue Four powers — US,
Russia,
China and Europe — are fully aware of
Greenland's strategic, economic, and military