• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

DRAIN THAT SWAMP! In dead of night Repubs. vote to give lawsuit immunity to Banks

Elfiero

Banned
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Messages
3,622
Reaction score
494
Points
83
Man I'm so glad we finally got someone from outside the "RHINO establishment" to stand up for the little guy.....................thanks Pence...and thank your boss the Drainer in Chief..............

Tuesday night, as many Americans were preparing to go to bed, an evenly divided Senate voted to give broad lawsuit immunity to credit card companies, auto lenders, credit reporting companies like Equifax, and many other financial firms. The 50-50 tie in the Senate was broken by Vice President Mike Pence (R), and the House approved the lawsuit immunity measure. President Trump is expected to sign it.

The resolution passed by the Senate overrides a rule created by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which prevents many financial firms from engaging in two abusive practices. The rule prohibited much of the financial industry from using “forced arbitration” agreements — a common tactic where a company refuses to do business with consumers who will not sign away their right to sue the company in a real court.

Consumers who sign away their right to sue must resolve any disputes with the company in a privatized arbitration system that favors corporate parties.

Additionally, the CFPB rule prohibited credit card companies and many other financial firms from requiring consumers to sign away their right to bring class action lawsuits, a form of litigation that ensures that companies that charge certain illegal fees to consumers face a consequence for their actions.

The vote is a major victory for the banking industry. Every Senate Democrat voted to preserve the CFPB rule, as did Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and John Kennedy (R-LA). All other Republicans voted to reverse the CFPB rule.

Tuesday evening’s vote also effectively strips the CFPB of much of its authority to rein in abusive arbitration clauses. Under the Congressional Review Act, CFPB cannot issue a rule “in substantially the same form” to one that is approved by Congress.

It’s worth noting that the 50 senators who supported the CFPB rule represent well over 30 million more people than the 50 senators who voted to rescind it. But, in the Devil’s arithmetic that governs the United States Senate, the will of the people plays only a minor role in determining who controls the Senate.


https://thinkprogress.org/in-the-de...-give-lawsuit-immunity-to-banks-d6504eab6b86/
 
Yet another example how Trumpsters are living in a world of fallacy and fiction. Confused and bamboozled, led by their noses by Trump, believing in something that simply isn't there. When the bubble finally bursts, it will be painful to watch, with plenty of bellyaching and self pity to go around.
 
Yet another example how Trumpsters are living in a world of fallacy and fiction. Confused and bamboozled, led by their noses by Trump, believing in something that simply isn't there. When the bubble finally bursts, it will be painful to watch, with plenty of bellyaching and self pity to go around.

Some of them will actually be relieved when that time comes, though they will NEVER admit it. Just like they can not currently admit they've been had by this two bit con man.
 
I once got a check from DirecTV in one of those class action lawsuits, for $2.30

Since them my bill has gone up 5000%
 
The ambulance chasers need throttled BIG time. That frivolous bs screws everyone and ***** over the consumer in the long run. The lawyers make out so well the run commercials 24/7.....sue,sue,sue,sue...for everything because we care.
 
Oh boy that was a biggy on my list. Just when I was going to sue Equifax for a million billion dollars.
 
This is much more complex an issue that you guys are letting on (through weak media coverage of course).

Conservatives have long supported smaller government, less regulation and tort reform. What part of this doesn't support that agenda?

We survived 200 years as a country without the Obama created Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Since it's creation, it's budget has ballooned to over $600 million/year. Remember, this NEVER EXISTING before Obama. The more you read about Dodd-Frank, it's just a bureaucratic mess and expansion to the Nth degree. Huge creation of government oversight. Huge creation of government employees, all in the name of so-called "consumer protection". It's overreach is growing and it is another example of how regulations, executive orders and memorandum are bypassing the correct, legislative branch governance by laws.

You guys answer to everything is "bigger government". I reject that in principle. And Dodd-Frank is a huge example of "bigger government" is here to save the day.
 
and Dems are for "the little people"

ha ha


Democrats Fight To Protect A $1.8 Trillion Tax Break That Benefits The Top 1%

As a result, 88% of the $1.8 trillion cost of this tax break goes to the 10% of families with incomes above $100,000.

So why are Democrats so intent on keeping it?

To understand that, you also have to understand that the benefits of the SALT deduction are heavily skewed toward wealthy high-tax states, for the simple reason that the more someone pays in state and local taxes, the more they can deduct from federal income taxes.

In fact, just seven states — California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York — account for more than half the deduction's cost, according to the Heritage Foundation. California alone is responsible for almost 20%.

Not only are these high-tax states, but they all just happen to be heavily Democratic.

http://www.investors.com/politics/e...ate-and-local-tax-deductions-in-tax-cut-plan/
 
Top