- Joined
- Jun 10, 2014
- Messages
- 10,999
- Reaction score
- 13,092
- Points
- 113
In a bold move, after extraordinary attempts from publications like NIST and Popular Mechanics to legitimize the 911 tower failures, Engineers and Architects has decided to endorse the 911 towers collapse theory forwarded in the official NIST study.
In a public statement NIST chairman Richard Rhodes stated that after great scrutiny, Engineers and Architects for 911 agreed that if NIST and Popular Mechanics believed that the collapse theory was in fact supportable by scientific theory, they would endorse the publications in demanding a full architectural recall of all high-rise steel frame buildings as they are clearly all at risk of total collapse as demonstrated by three buildings on 911. This would effect thousands of buildings in the world and has cause massive upheaval in the architectural and engineering profession.
"From an insurance point of view, the NIST and Popular Mechanics theory may be completely discredited purely as a means of economic survival." CNN Business Analyst Steven Roberts.
In one completely clever move, the Engineers and Architects for 911 may have forced the completely ridiculous collapse theory to be abandoned due to its utter impossibility. The fact that it happened 3 times in one day, that NIST failed abysmally to even deal with tower 7 and the fact that there are thousands of steel frame high rise buildings in the world that essentially meet the same specifications or even fall below the standards of the World Trade Centers makes the NIST Report and Popular Mechanics defense of it highly vulnerable to just this kind of attack from reputable engineers and architects.
In a public statement NIST chairman Richard Rhodes stated that after great scrutiny, Engineers and Architects for 911 agreed that if NIST and Popular Mechanics believed that the collapse theory was in fact supportable by scientific theory, they would endorse the publications in demanding a full architectural recall of all high-rise steel frame buildings as they are clearly all at risk of total collapse as demonstrated by three buildings on 911. This would effect thousands of buildings in the world and has cause massive upheaval in the architectural and engineering profession.
"From an insurance point of view, the NIST and Popular Mechanics theory may be completely discredited purely as a means of economic survival." CNN Business Analyst Steven Roberts.
In one completely clever move, the Engineers and Architects for 911 may have forced the completely ridiculous collapse theory to be abandoned due to its utter impossibility. The fact that it happened 3 times in one day, that NIST failed abysmally to even deal with tower 7 and the fact that there are thousands of steel frame high rise buildings in the world that essentially meet the same specifications or even fall below the standards of the World Trade Centers makes the NIST Report and Popular Mechanics defense of it highly vulnerable to just this kind of attack from reputable engineers and architects.