Where I have a problem with the bar fight explanation as to where her injuries came from is in the pictures of her wrists. It absolutely looked like bruising from where somebody had their hands wrapped around her wrists and squeezed them very hard. That doesn't happen in a bar fight. The neck injuries, maybe, the face bruising, definitely could have, but I don't those could be. That would take a very strong person and they sure appear as though they came from being restrained.
restrained by a bouncer perhaps?
If this barfight really did happen, and it's insane if the NFL did not investigate that, then i don't see how you can use those picture as any sort of evidence.
I don't mean to makes excuses for him, i just don't trust Goodell at all. He has proven time and again that he will do whatever the group pressuring him demands.
Spygate, he destroyed evidence and covered up because Kraft pushed him.
Big Ben - prior to Ben's incident, some people called it racist that Pacman had been suspended without being charged. You then knew the next significant white player to get in trouble woulde get the book thrown at him. Goodell really miled that incident to make himself look tough.
Concussions - there's evidence concussions are bad and most of the research is relatively new. There is no evidence that X number of concussions = dementia and early death. From the start, Goodell accepted the premise that concussions are a guaranteed death sentence and that the NFL knew that for years and covered it up. That was what the media wanted to hear so Goodell happily obliged just to get that one time pat on the back that the media always gives you just before they turn on you.
A real leader would have acknowledged the new studies on concussions, but also stressed that there is no proof that concussions cause problems later in life. He would have pointed out that players have the same suicide rate as the general public and that signs of CTE (which can only be diagnosed at autopsy) occur naturally in people as they age. You then state that you take it seriously and show all the new helmet designs and the new focus on penalizing headshots. Also point out there are far more concussions in soccer.
Do all of that and you don't have a bunch of moms not allowing their kids to play football. But that would have taken somebody with a spine push back against the narrative that playing football = early death.
Ray Rice - it is blatantly obvious that Goodell went completely by public reaction here. Everybody knew for months that Rice had hit his girlfriend and most predicted a suspension of 1 or 2 games. So that's what Goodell did. Then the video came out and there was outrage. Goodell pretended he didn't see the video. He then caved to public pressure to have Rice essentially blackballed from the league. I still believe Rice should sue Goodell. A real commissioner would have defended his 2 game suspension by stating the fact the it was Rice's first offense, his girfriend spoke on his behalf, he was completely honest, and that the CBA didn't really give him authority to do much more.
Deflate Gate - it was a minor offense but the owners wanted payback for the light punishment and cover up of spygate. It was pretty much OJ getting 30 years for that stupid hotel robbery as a make up for him getting away with murder. Goodell, weak as always, did as he was pressured and turned it into a circus. He allowed it to become about the balls and internet scientists quoting gas laws, instead of coming out strong and saying it would have been a fine, but Brady destroyed his phone, did not cooperate, and they had a guy nicknamed "The Deflater" so yeah, we're pretty sure they did this.
All of that is why when EE says the NFL cherry picked evidence, i tend to believe that. It's very easy for me to believe that there's a barfight video out there somewhere and there are text messages where she asks people to lie that were ignored because the media wanted EE suspended so Goodell delivered.