Google Swung Almost 10 Million Votes Towards Hillary Clinton In 2016

[Vincent]

What is the point when real Americans have had enough? What does it take to snap people out of their daydream lives and realize the crimes that have been committed by those who seek office and those who support them and the gravity of those crimes?

People need to hang for this...

 

[TDX27]

Google and Facebook. Facebook is already back to censoring conservatives and conservative viewpoints and even moreso than before.

 

[Sarge]

I don't know about hanging, but there needs to be sanctions of some kind. I know crazy Bernie wants to break up google and facebook. Maybe he is on to something in that regard. I know I have switched to DDG based on the recommendation of others on this board. If people quit using their platform(Google), it would probably hurt worse than anything else.

 

[ZonaBurgh]

Didn't realize Google was Russian.

 

[Ironcitysteelers]

Doesn’t matter what Ark uses. He knows pornhubs addresses

 

[deljzc]

Again, I've argued with Tibs on this for years.

He is so upset at Russia "inflencing" voters through social media, but BY FAR the greatest influence to voters is from our media and social media companies. Yet that is FINE because propaganda by Americans against Americans is just part of the election process. I don't understand how self-described "globalists" expect propaganda and election favoratism and influence to have borders. Hell, they don't even want REAL borders for REAL people, but somehow they want borders for the internet. Can Tibs explain that logic exactly? Real borders don't matter but borders between Russian facebook posts and American facebook posts need to be enforced by all means necessary!

Notice how the one benefitting democrats is "good" and the one benefitting republicans is "bad"? Yeah... I thought so.

 

[Vincent]

Again, I've argued with Tibs on this for years.

He is so upset at Russia "inflencing" voters through social media, but BY FAR the greatest influence to voters is from our media and social media companies. Yet that is FINE because propaganda by Americans against Americans is just part of the election process. I don't understand how self-described "globalists" expect propaganda and election favoratism and influence to have borders. Hell, they don't even want REAL borders for REAL people, but somehow they want borders for the internet. Can Tibs explain that logic exactly? Real borders don't matter but borders between Russian facebook posts and American facebook posts need to be enforced by all means necessary!

Notice how the one benefitting democrats is "good" and the one benefitting republicans is "bad"? Yeah... I thought so.

There is an old saying. Actually, there are several. But here's one. The sane define 'peace' as the absence of a threat. The left defines 'peace' by the absence of opposition. You see that play out in anything they say or do. All of them. They're totalitarians. All of them. "I don't like smoking - therefore, nobody gets to smoke." "I don't like meat - therefore, people that eat meat are savages." "I'm uncomfortable in my own skin - therefore all of society must accommodate me.". And anybody that even allows a thought to the contrary pass through their minds is a 'hater'. The sig line below bears this out.

BTW, the OP isn't somebody's opinion. It is the result of scientific research. Y'know how the left worships science. This is science. And it says that Google materially impacted the election. Not Russia or anything Russian - Google.

Here's the data... https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/112/33/E4512.full.pdf?with-ds=yes Note that it is from the National Academy of Sciences.

And here's some reaction from the scientific community... https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/10/could-google-influence-presidential-election https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/08/internet-search-engines-may-be-influencing-elections

Note that the data and reaction well preceded the 2016 election, and indeed questioned what effect such chicanery might have on 16.. Certainly such would not cause the totalitarians any concerns about subsequent election outcomes... because... well, that is what they paid good money for.

What Lyin' Ted axed Epstein (no relation), and Epstein's answers should justify a special council, prosecutions, and some requisitions for high quality rope. Especially in light of this whole Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia, Russia subterfuge and all involved in it. Those were crimes.

 

[Superman]

will 21, Flog or Tibs attempt to refute this?

let's wait and see

<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/ToMjGpz81S7usvTIM8w" width="480" height="271" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/hero0fwar-caddy-shack-ToMjGpz81S7usvTIM8w">via GIPHY</a></p>

 

[Vincent]

Just in case you're not clear on where ǝןboob stands on patriotism...

 

[DBS1970]

They socialists in big tech are attempting to shift the Overton Window and control thought by controlling the language.

 

[Coach]

Didn't realize Google was Russian.

Evern worse, they are anti American.

 

[SteelChip]

Internet search engines may be influencing elections
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2015/08/internet-search-engines-may-be-influencing-elections

A few percentage points here and there may seem meager, but the authors point out that elections are often won by margins smaller than 1%. If 80% of eligible voters have Internet access and 10% of them are undecided, the search engine effect could convince an additional 25% of those undecided to vote for a target candidate, the team reports online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. That type of swing would determine the election outcome, as long as the expected win margin was 2% or less. “This is a huge effect,” Epstein says. “It’s so big that it’s quite dangerous.”

That's actually pretty scary. There are so many uninformed people out there that I believe they could easily be swayed by search engines. My son in law is a retail mgr and is limited in the time he has available to research real world events, so he has only his employees, customers and an occasional internet article as reference.....and his opinions tell that tale in spades.

Then there are those of us that sit around all day and shake our heads at the slight of hand and purposeful misinformation coming out of the Progs and Dims.....and say.

 

[Sarge]

Just in case you're not clear on where ǝןboob stands on patriotism...

This is absolutely true. Just did a google search for patriot, and sure as ****, there it is.

 

[SteelChip]

well I'll be damned, even the urban dictionary Sarge.....looky here.

Patriot
Originally, a patriot was someone who loves their country and supports it, but won't blindly follow whatever their country's government does. These days, it is synonymous with Nationalist, which is someone who blindly follows whatever his country's government does, and lacks his own ability to think and reason for himself.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=patriot

 

[Sarge]

well I'll be damned, even the urban dictionary Sarge.....looky here.

So, that being the case, were all the Democrats Nationalists for blindly following Obama's government? I mean, they were singing songs and fainting and ****. I don't think the hard core Trump folks are singing or fainting. At least not that I have seen, anyway.

 

[Vincent]

I don't think the hard core Trump folks are singing or fainting. At least not that I have seen, anyway.

Trump folks don't even faint when they stand in line in the baking sun for days to get into Trump rallies. Real Americans. Not fake Americans.

 

[Steelr4evr]

Trump folks don't even faint when they stand in line in the baking sun for days to get into Trump rallies. Real Americans. Not fake Americans.

Next time he pops up in Florida I'll be attending. I normally don't go to any political events ,but I'm extra motivated.

I will make sure to wear my Forged "Don't Tread On Me" t-shirt .

 

[Steelr4evr]

They socialists in big tech are attempting to shift the Overton Window and control thought by controlling the language.

I don't understand why they embrace such oppressive garbage. The end result when fully implemented will be the opposite of what they think. Dumb *******.

 

[Vincent]

I don't understand why they embrace such oppressive garbage. The end result when fully implemented will be the opposite of what they think. Dumb *******.

That assumes they 'are on our side'. Assume that they aren't. Then examine DBS' statement through that lens.

One could make the argument that we're in World War 3 as we speak. Mankind has weathered countless hot wars. Fortunately we successfully weathered a cold war. Both sides emerged intact. We went about our affairs. The sovs and their little yellow friends have nothing better to do than study circumstances, learn from them, and regroup to fight another day. The sovs have told us repeatedly that they 'will bury us from within' and how they will do it. Even the most cursory examination of the last 60+ years reveals that that agenda has unfolded with remarkable precision.

Their little yellow friends are every bit as entrenched in the subversion of these here United States. I would argue that their strategery eclipses that of the sovs.

Google threw 10 millions votes to a candidate whose presidency would have been our demise. Google is developing chinese AI.. To call Google's relationship to the PLA 'symbiotic' is to understate.

We are in a civil war. 'Hot war' is passé, unproductive, and would destroy the prize the sovs and their little yellow friends seek. This war is a war of words. Google holds sway over words, their meaning, who presents them, who sees them, and ultimately how they affect the war. In such a war movement in the Overton window is a fait accompli. And Google IS NOT our friend.

Actually that was the OP.

 

[Steelr4evr]

That assumes they 'are on our side'. Assume that they aren't. Then examine DBS' statement through that lens.

One could make the argument that we're in World War 3 as we speak. Mankind has weathered countless hot wars. Fortunately we successfully weathered a cold war. Both sides emerged intact. We went about our affairs. The sovs and their little yellow friends have nothing better to do than study circumstances, learn from them, and regroup to fight another day. The sovs have told us repeatedly that they 'will bury us from within' and how they will do it. Even the most cursory examination of the last 60+ years reveals that that agenda has unfolded with remarkable precision.

Their little yellow friends are every bit as entrenched in the subversion of these here United States. I would argue that their strategery eclipses that of the sovs.

Google threw 10 millions votes to a candidate whose presidency would have been our demise. Google is developing chinese AI.. To call Google's relationship to the PLA 'symbiotic' is to understate.

We are in a civil war. 'Hot war' is passé, unproductive, and would destroy the prize the sovs and their little yellow friends seek. This war is a war of words. Google holds sway over words, their meaning, who presents them, who sees them, and ultimately how they affect the war. In such a war movement in the Overton window is a fait accompli. And Google IS NOT our friend.

Actually that was the OP.

Oh i agree this stuff has been going on a very long time. I'm very enlightened to it all. I'm not so sure a hot war won't come to our shores within 20 years considering the massive erosion to the backbone or lack of one in the youth of our country.

If I'm an enemy the northwest shores look very inviting for invasion. They may even be welcomed. I of course hope that never comes to pass,but all empires fall eventually. Our fall will be because we did it to ourselves by disregarding the history and foundation upon which we are built.

 

[Vincent]

Well, duh!

Its stupefying, really. Trump needs to crush these enemies as one would ruthlessly crush a cockroach. And poop on the goo. (Note to AI bot - the preceding sequence os words expresses overt hostility)

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/01/opinion/peter-thiel-google.html
Good for Google, Bad for America
At its core, artificial intelligence is a military technology. Why is the company sharing it with a rival?
By Peter Thiel | Aug. 1, 2019
Mr. Thiel is an entrepreneur and investor.

A “Manhattan Project” for artificial intelligence is how Demis Hassabis, the founder of DeepMind, described his company in 2010, when I was one of its first investors. I took it as figurative grandiosity. I should have taken it as a literal warning sign, because that is how it was taken in foreign capitals that were paying close attention.

Now almost a decade later, DeepMind is the crown jewel of Google’s A.I. effort. It has been the object of intense fascination in East Asia especially since March 2016 when its AlphaGo software project beat Lee Sedol, a champion of the ancient strategic board game of Go.

Such feats notwithstanding, DeepMind, having now gone on three times longer than the original Manhattan Project, is not clearly any closer to its core goal of creating an “artificial general intelligence” that rivals or replaces humanity. But it is finally becoming clear that, as with nuclear fission before it, the first users of the machine learning tools being created today will be generals rather than board game strategists.

A.I. is a military technology. Forget the sci-fi fantasy; what is powerful about actually existing A.I. is its application to relatively mundane tasks like computer vision and data analysis. Though less uncanny than Frankenstein’s monster, these tools are nevertheless valuable to any army — to gain an intelligence advantage, for example, or to penetrate defenses in the relatively new theater of cyberwarfare, where we are already living amid the equivalent of a multinational shooting war.

No doubt machine learning tools have civilian uses, too; A.I. is a good example of a “dual use” technology. But that common-sense understanding of A.I.’s ambiguity has been strangely missing from the narrative that pits a monolithic “A.I.” against all of humanity.

A.I.’s military power is the simple reason that the recent behavior of America’s leading software company, Google — starting an A.I. lab in China while ending an A.I. contract with the Pentagon — is shocking. As President Barack Obama’s defense secretary Ash Carter pointed out last month, “If you’re working in China, you don’t know whether you’re working on a project for the military or not.”

No intensive investigation is required to confirm this. All one need do is glance at the Communist Party of China’s own constitution: Xi Jinping added the principle of “civil-military fusion,” which mandates that all research done in China be shared with the People’s Liberation Army, in 2017.

That same year, Google decided to open an A.I. lab in Beijing. According to Fei-Fei Li, the executive who opened it, the lab is “focused on basic A.I. research” because Google is “an A.I.-first company” in a world where “A.I. and its benefits have no borders.” All this is part of a “huge transformation” in “humanity” itself. Back in the United States, a rebellion among rank and file employees led Google last June to announce the abandonment of its “Project Maven” A.I. contract with the Pentagon. Perhaps the most charitable word for these twin decisions would be to call them naïve.

How can Google use the rhetoric of “borderless” benefits to justify working with the country whose “Great Firewall” has imposed a border on the internet itself? This way of thinking works only inside Google’s cosseted Northern California campus, quite distinct from the world outside. The Silicon Valley attitude sometimes called “cosmopolitanism” is probably better understood as an extreme strain of parochialism, that of fortunate enclaves isolated from the problems of other places — and incurious about them.

A little curiosity about China would have gone a long way, since the Communist Party is not shy about declaring its commitment to domination in general and exploitation of technology in particular. Of course, any American who pays attention and questions the Communist line is accused by the party of having a “Cold War mentality” — but this very accusation relies on forgetfulness and incuriosity among its intended audience.

Since 1971, the American elite’s Cold War attitude toward China’s leaders has been one of warm indulgence. In the 1970s and 1980s, that meant supporting China against a greater adversary, the Soviet Union. What is extremely strange is that this policy of indulgence continued and even deepened after the Soviet Union’s collapse in 1991.

A few years after the Cold War ended, American leaders started treating China the way they had treated West Germany and Japan. We tolerated punishing trade deficits in the 1970s and 1980s to support those two allies, and we had strategic reasons to do it. As for building up China in the 1990s and 2000s, America’s generosity was supposed to somehow lead to China’s liberalization. In reality, it led to the transfer of our industrial base to a foreign rival.

In this sense, a zombie “Cold War mentality” never went away — though it certainly stopped making sense. Only recently, with help from Mr. Xi’s decision last year to, in effect, declare himself potential leader for life, has Donald Trump become the first president since Richard Nixon to pay attention and run a reality check on China.

Silicon Valley is not alone in its inattention to geopolitical reality; some on Wall Street have been eager to make excuses for Google’s naïveté. The timing is not coincidental; just this week American officials met their Chinese counterparts in Shanghai to negotiate a trade deal.

The flip side of China’s huge trade surplus has been America’s huge current account deficit. All of the dollars we send abroad that never get used to buy American goods have to go somewhere, and most go through New York’s money center banks on their way to buying financial assets. Since upsetting this imbalance is a threat to profits, Wall Street would prefer to cave on trade and keep Google’s stock price high while they’re at it.

But the banks’ experience of the last few decades of globalization has not been representative. The trade deficits that brought flows of money to Wall Street took jobs and bargaining power away from the median worker.

Wages have been stagnant since the 1970s. The difference between our post-1971 era of globalization and the post-1945 midcentury boom is a breakdown in the relationship between the parts and the whole: An archipelago of inward-looking, parochial places like Wall Street and Silicon Valley have done exceedingly well for themselves while their fellow citizens have been left behind in a stagnant economy.

In the 1950s, the cliché was that “what’s good for General Motors is good for the country.” Google makes no such claim for itself; it would be too obviously false. Instead, Google says it is “committed to significantly improving the lives of as many people as possible”— a standard so vague as to defy any challenge.

By now we should understand that the real point of talking about what’s good for the world is to evade responsibility for the good of the country.

 

[scraps]

#Hero

Google Engineer Leaks Massive Trove of Info on Google’s Information Control Operations — Reveals Google Sent Police and FBI to Intimidate Him

Zachary Vorhies went public today and exposed Google and its operation to control the global information landscape.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">NEW: Google "Machine Learning Fairness" Whistleblower Goes Public, says: "burden lifted off of my soul," Leaks Hundreds of Internal Documents - WATCH --> <a href="https://t.co/58M73VtAlp">https://t.co/58M73VtAlp</a> <a href="https://t.co/SzCJ9Gt3Zt">pic.twitter.com/SzCJ9Gt3Zt</a></p>— Project Veritas (@Project_Veritas) <a href="https://twitter.com/Project_Veritas/status/1161630504132710400?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 14, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...google-sent-police-and-fbi-to-intimidate-him/