• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Hillary finds cure for insomnia

Vader

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
7,497
Reaction score
5,031
Points
113
I don't know that the country would elect another Bush. Although Jeb is arguably more Conservative than W, I think most of the party Conservatives would stay home like they did for McCain and Romney. Of course the MSM would go full-bore about not electing another Boosh while conveniently ignoring that we are going to elect another Clinton.

Exactly. I'm not sure I'd vote for another Bush. He is too liberal. This country has big problems and electing another Dem lite isn't the answer.
 

xjx

Well-known member
Member
Joined
May 9, 2014
Messages
4,814
Reaction score
4,325
Points
113
The only choices will be dem or dem lite. That's the problem the American voters face.
 

Ron Burgundy

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Messages
27,124
Reaction score
25,661
Points
113
Location
Rochester, PA
Exactly. I'm not sure I'd vote for another Bush. He is too liberal. This country has big problems and electing another Dem lite isn't the answer.
Or running another Dem Lite and losing. If Romney had gotten as many votes as McCain he would have won.
The other message the GOP got was that their technology for reaching voters was way behind the Dem's, not surprising since the techie people in Silicon Valley tend to be younger and Democrat. I'm on my county GOP committee and until the end of last year on the PA State GOP committee and have been to the meetings. Basically the State GOP got lit up by the locals for Romney running a lousy campaign and took that message back to D.C. I was on the inside and will tell you that Romney's campaign was run by a number of McCain retreads and didn't know WTF they were doing. We'll see if things get better the next time.
 

xjx

Well-known member
Member
Joined
May 9, 2014
Messages
4,814
Reaction score
4,325
Points
113
With all of the money, power and influence on the line you would think that those running political campaigns would have the best of the best tech **** going on.

On the other hand...since the saudis, the Chinese and the Russians have overwhelming power and money to but the prostitute that we refer to as " president of the United states" , it really doesn't matter who votes or how many times anyone votes. The electorate is bought and/or sold to the highest bidder.
 

xjx

Well-known member
Member
Joined
May 9, 2014
Messages
4,814
Reaction score
4,325
Points
113
With all of the money, power and influence on the line you would think that those running political campaigns would have the best of the best tech **** going on.

On the other hand...since the saudis, the Chinese and the Russians have overwhelming power and money to but the prostitute that we refer to as " president of the United states" , it really doesn't matter who votes or how many times anyone votes. The electorate is bought and/or sold to the highest bidder.
 

SteelChip

Well-known member
Contributor
Joined
Apr 9, 2014
Messages
8,290
Reaction score
9,782
Points
113
Location
Interlachen, Florida
Paul should be the nominee. He's the only one who is going to change anything in D.C.

BTW a good team would be Paul- President, Rubio- VP, Trey Gowdy- Attorney General

This is what I would hope for but it seems that the Republican establishment has their own ideas and listening to us would not be one of them.

View attachment 99
 

Vader

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
7,497
Reaction score
5,031
Points
113
This is what I would hope for but it seems that the Republican establishment has their own ideas and listening to us would not be one of them.

View attachment 99

**** um. I'll put out my Rand Paul sign and vote for him in the primary. I've already been talking him up to my friends (most didn't even vote last time). I'll even help the campaign locally if I can.
 

Vincent

@#$% the 'narrative'
Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2014
Messages
1,336
Reaction score
1,674
Points
113
(most didn't even vote last time).

That's the problem.

Conservatives outnumber the possessed two to one. Linguini spines, er sorry, "moderates" that lean conservative outnumber their possessed counterparts two to one. There is a significant element of conservatives that are so damn self righteous that they sit on their ***** if they aren't absolutely in love with the candidate. THEY elect the criminals that run the gubmint because they don't vote.

You don't vote for the candidate. You vote against theirs. There hasn't been a compelling candidate since Dutch retired. The whole political landscape is a wasteland. Its a sea of bullshit. One side is from the pit of hell. The other side just wants to "get along". The only thing you get by voting for a pubbie is that it cancels a possessed vote. Shame on you if you don't vote because you're giving the country to the possessed.

Look at what not voting has gotten us. We had eight years of coked up sex fiend from Arkansas that couldn't tell you who his father was because Bush wasn't interested in winning. Now we've had six years of a coked up fanook from God knows where that couldn't tell you who his father was because the other candidate was too old, or a Mormon. These lowlifes sullied our White House not because of anything that qualifies them to darken its door but because too many people that should know better were too damn lazy to show up.

We face the very real prospect of handing this Republic to the deeply flawed spouse of that coked up sex fiend from Arkansas that couldn't tell you who his father was purely because the pubbies lack a candidate to draw the terminally lazy. This spouse is nearly as unscathed by accomplishment as the fanook that beat her in 08, but she's the object of the possessed's lust. That it. That's what could hand her the Republic. That and the laziness of people that should know better.

Its pathetic.
 

Yinzerlyn

Moderator
Moderator
Contributor
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
7,884
Reaction score
2,860
Points
113
Location
Oz
She has no chance in a general election. She's the woman version of Bernie Sanders.

Well, yeah. But she's a WOMAN and in the eyes of the libs, she's untouchable and electable. Keep repeating that mantra to the sheep, and she COULD win.
 

Sarge

Well-known member
Contributor
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
11,186
Reaction score
16,718
Points
113
I do not get the appeal of Hillary Clinton. What has she done that qualifies her to be President?

I know for libs, it is probably more about "making history" than having competent leadership in the White House. You would have thought the current president would have taught them better. If you think about it, it is not real difficult to figure out how we ended up where we are after that last few elections.
 

Ron Burgundy

Well-known member
Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Messages
27,124
Reaction score
25,661
Points
113
Location
Rochester, PA

DBS1970

I hate you all and I blame Ark for that.
Contributor
Joined
Apr 12, 2014
Messages
6,893
Reaction score
6,845
Points
113
Sorry Vincent but me taking a stand and refusing to give my vote to a candidate and party platform that doesn't significantly differ from the Neo-Socialists isn't the problem. The problem is the GOP not committing to individual liberty, ending senseless wars, free markets and small government. I refuse to support the GOP anymore as simply the lesser of two evils. Supporting the lesser of two evils is still supporting evil.
 

Yinzerlyn

Moderator
Moderator
Contributor
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
7,884
Reaction score
2,860
Points
113
Location
Oz
Top