You mean they didn't curb stomp those 2-10 teams in back to back weeks at home?
I notice you just make general lame accusations without pointing to specifics. How is "about everything" inaccurate" in my post? It must be so easy to prove since "about everything" is wrong. No, but you never point to specific assertions and how they are specifically wrong, just make general claims and leave it at that. How impressive.
And although this will cause some posters to fall into a coronary event, what does the team's lack of focus vs. crappy teams come down to? Head coach, period. The man is a picture of lack of discipline. Who here remembers how JoePA at PSU used to fret when playing weak teams, going on and on about some minor bright spot on the opponent, and drilling on that highmark: "Oh geez, those Temple Owls have magnificent playmakers on that team, we are really going to have to focus in order to minimize their attack." And then PSU would blow them out by 50. That's what real head coaching does.
And the big question everyone is asking: Do they finally win a playoff game after 7 years of not? That seems to be what has spurned all the change, after all.
well for one Burrow has never been All Pro, while his talent may be on that level, he has not been named All Pro in any season and the Steelers are 2-3 against Burrow so losing both games last year if he had played is not a certainty
Give it a rest . Go take a walk. Over and over and over. Mann oh Mann.
And the saddest part of it all is you don't even realize I am right. So sad.
No one is arguing with you about this.
Good Lord you’re a clueless ****-tard.
Didnt his replacement have like a 98 passer rating?
If you can't/don't recognize Burrow as an "All Pro"- level talent, I don't know what to tell you. Anyone who goes into KC and beats Mahomes to go to the Super Bowl, as Burrow did 3 years ago, is playing at a "Pro Bowl-level" whether or not he officially made All Pro or not. So, semantics is what you're going for? OK. Semantics it is. If you don't want to admit playing Cinci with Burrow behind center is a heck of a lot bigger challenge than without, then, OK there too.
Name calling is not encouraged on this board.
Browning had a 69 rating vs. Pgh and a 25 QBR in 2023. Not quite what Burrow usually does against us.
Facts is what i am going for
And let's just say for the sake of argument you are 100% right. Then what? Because if you are, and since we cannot control any of it, the logical conclusion would be to go root for another team that better satisfies your desires for your football team. Right? It seems that you are very unhappy with the Pittsburgh Steelers and that would be a solution that you can control for your unhappiness.
If I remember correctly, Burrow has an 88 lifetime passer rating vs us... so average... also QBR remains a proprietary garbage stat from ESPN... stats shouldn't be calculated with feels and opinions as the driving force...
A lot of professional talking heads prefer it saying it is the most-accurate measure for QBs out there. Not saying it is or isn't just saying a lot of pros prefer it.
So stats come in several variants that range from purely objective to purely subjective.
A lot of professional talking heads prefer it saying it is the most-accurate measure for QBs out there. Not saying it is or isn't just saying a lot of pros prefer it.
I understand, just saying lots of talking heads stand by it, that's all.
