• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Iran official: We’ll bolster our military until Israel is destroyed

A nonprofit group in Colorado is out with a “shocking new ad” hitting incumbent Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet for his support of the Iran nuclear agreement.

Love it. Back at yaz.

 
So how did Bush letting them develop all those centrifuges help Israel?

Iran got the advanced centrifuges by buying the plans from a Pakistani scientist in the 1990's, while Clinton was President. Bush had NOTHING TO ******* DO WITH IRAN GETTING THE ADVANCED CENTRIFUGES.

The IR-2m and the IR-4 centrifuges have the same length and diameter. They are derived from the Pakistani P2 centrifuge design that A.Q. Khan sold Iran in the 1990s. Iran subsequently modified this design (see figures 1 and 2). The IR-2m rotor is made of two carbon fiber rotor sections or tubes and a maraging steel bellows. The IR-4 has two carbon fiber tubes connected by a carbon fiber bellows, an unusual choice likely reflecting a shortage of maraging steel. Both centrifuge designs use a top and bottom bearing and a motor taken from the P2 design.

http://isis-online.org/isis-reports/detail/irans-advanced-centrifuges/

21STEELERS21 said:
I suppose Bush letting North Korea have nuclear weapons was a positive development as well?

The agreement between the United States and North Korea is a blueprint for why the Iran deal is guaranteed to fail.

The same thinking that existed for the North Korea deal - get them to sign and they will keep their word - is in play with the Iran deal. Exactly the same.

And North Korea is on its way to developing a nuclear weapon. So you think repeating this mistake is the way to go??

21STEELERS21 said:
Invading Iraq was the whole start to the nuclear race. Do you think Iran and North Korea thought if he can evade them, are we
next and what do we need to prevent an invasion?

Goddammit, the reasons for invading Iraq - after the U.N. approved use of force, and after the President sought and obtained Congressional approval for the military action - included their development and use of weapons of mass destruction, including gas, installing a representative government in the Middle East other than Israel, their repeated refusal to allow access to U.N. weapons inspectors, their violation of no-fly zones, their involvement and sponsorship of terrorism, and on and on.

This effort to hide things from the inspectors is not one or two isolated events, quite the contrary. This is part and parcel of a policy of evasion and deception that goes back 12 years, a policy set at the highest levels of the Iraqi regime. We know that Saddam Hussein has what is called quote, "a higher committee for monitoring the inspections teams," unquote. Think about that. Iraq has a high-level committee to monitor the inspectors who were sent in to monitor Iraq's disarmament. Not to cooperate with them, not to assist them, but to spy on them and keep them from doing their jobs.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/feb/05/iraq.usa

Stop blindly repeating what some left-wing web site barfed out. Conduct legitimate analysis. Think, for a change. And for the love of God and all that is holy, stop blaming Bush.
 
Top