- Joined
- Apr 8, 2014
- Messages
- 9,631
- Reaction score
- 12,839
- Points
- 113
i am talking about everyone. why not?The people who live under the bridge now who were part of making billions for a company that damaged them permanently couod be compensated yes. The Steelers pissed 2.75 million on an injured player last year. Tuna gave 4 million and took care of 20 people. We are not talking about everyone. Case by case.
.. said about this man.
Pretty much the approach I take on a much smaller scale. When people get deep pockets they tend to get tighter with their funds. So it takes a special man (or woman) who does for others with no expected return.
I know a few from this site who are like this to animals or people.
Kudos to you all keep up the good work, and kudos to you Bill.
The League does have one - it's called a minimum salary which is set at multiples of the average person's annual salary. The league shouldn't be responsible for topping up ex-players finances if they (or their advisers) can't manage the money they have already been paid
Should I post my address?Great read and post slash, thanks for of them along the way
A-N-D
THANK YOU for those you get to help, many people just need a hand up, and at times we can lend that hand.
Salute the nation
I've heard that the only thing wrong with Italy is all the Italians there.
Oh jeeeeez. You had me at “ force a certain percent of pay”. Force.One way they could do it is force a certain percent of pay into a post NFL fund. Once that person stops playing that fund could be used to give out paychecks every 2 weeks or every month for xx years. At least it would give guys some sort of stable income for a little bit.