• Please be aware we've switched the forums to their own URL. (again) You'll find the new website address to be www.steelernationforum.com Thanks
  • Please clear your private messages. Your inbox is close to being full.

Liberalism is a mental illness thread

806473731_10242526451648165_1889134300182682617_n.jpg
 
IndySteel said:
So? He didn’t kill three little kids.
Click to expand...
You are fine with child abuse and domestic abuse as long as he doesn't kill them? They should definitely dig into the other jurors as well though. The point is this guy might not be the "hero" people are trying to make him out to be. I agree with his decision and glad he held out but seems like there may be alterior motives there
 
jitter77 said:
You are fine with child abuse and domestic abuse as long as he doesn't kill them? They should definitely dig into the other jurors as well though. The point is this guy might not be the "hero" people are trying to make him out to be. I agree with his decision and glad he held out but seems like there may be alterior motives there
Click to expand...
You want only folks with perfect pasts?

Whatever happened previously in this man's life is over. Hopefully, he is a better person.

In this one isolated instance, he did humanity well, and yet you find it ok to cast aspersions on him.

What about the other 11 whackjobs-- that couldn't find a woman guilty who herself admitting to killing her 3 kids, who's lawyer admitted she did the murders-- what work did YOU do to find out their pasts? Why in the heell would you seek to discredit the ONE GUY who actually did his job for the betterment of society?

Or, more likely, did you cut/paste some slop you found, and now you are trying to rationalize your lazy lack of research into the rest of the jurors?
 
Last edited:
Confluence said:
You want only folks with perfect pasts?

Whatever happened previously in this man's life is over. Hopefully, he is a better person.

In this one isolated instance, he did humanity well, and yet you find it ok to cast aspersions on him.

What about the other 11 whackjobs-- that couldn't find a woman who herself admitting to killing her 3 kids, who's lawyer admitted she did the murders-- what work did YOU do to find out their pasts? Why in the heell would you seek to discredit the ONE GUY who actually did his job for the betterment of society?

Or, more likely, did you cut/paste some slop you found, and now you are trying to rationalize your lazy lack of research into the rest of the jurors?
Click to expand...
even more absurd - these women who were intent on finding this nutcase Not Guilty have openly admitted that they could have done exactly what Lindsay Clancy had done.

yet ... crickets about these nut jobs
 
Confluence said:
You want only folks with perfect pasts?

Whatever happened previously in this man's life is over. Hopefully, he is a better person.

In this one isolated instance, he did humanity well, and yet you find it ok to cast aspersions on him.

What about the other 11 whackjobs-- that couldn't find a woman guilty who herself admitting to killing her 3 kids, who's lawyer admitted she did the murders-- what work did YOU do to find out their pasts? Why in the heell would you seek to discredit the ONE GUY who actually did his job for the betterment of society?

Or, more likely, did you cut/paste some slop you found, and now you are trying to rationalize your lazy lack of research into the rest of the jurors?
Click to expand...
I already said the other jurors should be looked into if they are airing dirty laundry. The guy made the right decision I would just caution who we make heros.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top