I do not subscribe to this loser mentality.
Mediocre, your words, IS NOT being a loser. It's simply mediocre.
I do not subscribe to this loser mentality.
If Marsha and Belicheat weren't in NE, we would easily have 1 and maybe 2 more SB's under Tomlin. It's just like Michelson when Tiger was in his prime. He came up against the best and finished 2nd most of the time. That is the same with the Steelers. As much as we know they cheated, etc. etc. etc., Marsha and Belicheat have easily been the best over the past 15 years. Tomlin isn't going anywhere unless he wants to and honestly, deservedly so.
The question is not whether Tomlin gets the extension...
the real question is how LONG Tomlin wants the extension to be for...
Tomlin is now ingrained into the organization and the "Rooney Way"...he is a permanent fixture on the North Side and the face of the Steeler management team.
He can basically determine how long he wants to be the Head Coach of the Pittsburgh Steelers at this point..
If fact...I could see him moving into a higher role within the organization when he decides to retire from Coaching.
I know theres a large segment here that choose not to accept this...but it is reality IMHO..
I am not satisfied with winning seasons, but I grew up with the 70s Steelers. I expect more that being a little sister to the Patriots, and Tomlin is not the guy. I would rather try with a different coach than keep settling.
I honestly don't have a problem with Tomlin, although it does drive me crazy with the annual losses to teams like Jacksonville, Tampa, or a disseminated Ravens team. And the fact that the word adjustment doesn't seem to be in Coach Cool Shades vocabulary.
This is likely Ben's last year.
If Ben retires, we'll see how average Tomlin is a a coach.
I do not subscribe to this mediocre mentality.Mediocre, your words, IS NOT being a loser. It's simply mediocre.
Tomlin has not only been up against who many think is the best coach of all time and the best QB of all time but we all know they also cheated to get where they are. All the more reason to give props to Tomlin.There's not a coach in the league right now that I would take over him.
Lance Armstrong was the greatest of all time and then we found out the truth. We already know the truth about the pats***** just not in detail.
Exactly. Thus, making Tomlin look even better because he was up against a cheating organization that got away with it.
So would Vince Lombardi. What a silly statement. Take your franchise QB away and replace him with Landry Jones, I'll give you any coach in the history of the game.....you won't be over .500 for the season.
Tomlin is pretty bad without Ben, underachieves relative to his talent, and has a bad history of losing to too many .500 and below teams.
Keep Lombardi's name out of this, He took over a bad team and made them winners. Tomlin won with Cowher's players early.
Continuity is a good thing to a point. The question is at what point do you say 10-6 and a playoff loss is not the continuity you want? Tomlin has not progressed in his tenure here, and his most memorable moment on the sidelines may be the bush-league incident of interfering with the kick return in that Ratbirds game.
Ben retires next year and this team instantly becomes the Steelers of the 1980s.
This was a mistake.
If we had drafted Marino they would have renamed the Lombardi trophy to the Noll trophy.More memorable than winning a SB?
That all happens.....if they do not find a suitable replacement for Ben. If they do, Tomlin will keep winning, just like he always has. Coaches almost never win without a good QB. It's happened....but not often. Even Chuck Noll couldn't do it, hence my comment above.
If we had drafted Marino they would have renamed the Lombardi trophy to the Noll trophy.
This old argument never dies. Yep, Tomlin won with Cowher's players early. After Cowher's were gone? Still winning. I'm sorry, it's a dumb argument to say a coach is not good because he gets worse if you take away a franchise QB. No ****! Give Bill Belecheck Landry Jones instead of Brady. Even he couldn't cheat enough to keep winning. Chuck Noll had a lot of lousy seasons at the end of his coaching career. He also had people like Bubby Brister, Todd Blackledge and Mark Malone playing QB. Does his poor record after Bradshaw was gone mean he was a bad coach? Or did he instantly and magically get dumber when his Franchise QB retired and he had to use sub standard players at the position?
Continuity is a good thing to a point. The question is at what point do you say 10-6 and a playoff loss is not the continuity you want? Tomlin has not progressed in his tenure here, and his most memorable moment on the sidelines may be the bush-league incident of interfering with the kick return in that Ratbirds game.
Ben retires next year and this team instantly becomes the Steelers of the 1980s.
This was a mistake.