- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 3,985
- Reaction score
- 5,468
- Points
- 113
So we all know Devin McCourty is retiring. Good for him, he was a decent player. He can join his brother on Good Morning Football. But here is the thing, per Field Yates:
“While he is retiring, the Patriots tacked a year onto Devin McCourty’s contract at a minimum value ($1.165M for 2023), per source.
This is a cap tactic that creates $5.035M in 2023 cap space, while pushing $6.2M in dead money to 2024, presuming the retirement is officially processed after June 1.“
This is the type of bullshit that Belichick pulls. Always pushes the envelope to what is/isn’t legal and skirts the accountability. Can that franchise just follow the freaking rules as the collective ownership agreed to them?
Note, I know Yates also indicated New Orleans did the same thing to Brees when he retired, but didn’t Brees take a reduction the year before his retirement?
“While he is retiring, the Patriots tacked a year onto Devin McCourty’s contract at a minimum value ($1.165M for 2023), per source.
This is a cap tactic that creates $5.035M in 2023 cap space, while pushing $6.2M in dead money to 2024, presuming the retirement is officially processed after June 1.“
This is the type of bullshit that Belichick pulls. Always pushes the envelope to what is/isn’t legal and skirts the accountability. Can that franchise just follow the freaking rules as the collective ownership agreed to them?
Note, I know Yates also indicated New Orleans did the same thing to Brees when he retired, but didn’t Brees take a reduction the year before his retirement?
Last edited: